不同家庭的文化相关父母干预:范围审查。

IF 6.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Isha Dua, Parker Grant, Jazzmin Demy, Heather Prime
{"title":"不同家庭的文化相关父母干预:范围审查。","authors":"Isha Dua, Parker Grant, Jazzmin Demy, Heather Prime","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00536-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study is a scoping review on coparenting interventions with diverse families to assess how the characteristics, needs, and perspectives of participating coparents are addressed. We followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Eligibility criteria: participants belonged to racially minoritized groups (≥ 50% sample); studies reported on an intervention; the intervention targeted the coparental relationship OR assessed coparenting as an outcome. Demographics, study, and intervention characteristics, and the process and content of cultural adaptation were extracted. A systematic search was last executed in April 2025 in PsycINFO and MEDLINE, which yielded 1875 records. Following abstract/title screening, 409 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 35 studies were included in the review. Studies prioritized surface-level (e.g., language) over deep-level dimensions (e.g., goals). Few studies used an adaptation framework. We discuss how researchers and clinicians can consider the unique experiences of coparenting in diverse communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culturally Relevant Coparenting Interventions for Diverse Families: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Isha Dua, Parker Grant, Jazzmin Demy, Heather Prime\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10567-025-00536-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current study is a scoping review on coparenting interventions with diverse families to assess how the characteristics, needs, and perspectives of participating coparents are addressed. We followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Eligibility criteria: participants belonged to racially minoritized groups (≥ 50% sample); studies reported on an intervention; the intervention targeted the coparental relationship OR assessed coparenting as an outcome. Demographics, study, and intervention characteristics, and the process and content of cultural adaptation were extracted. A systematic search was last executed in April 2025 in PsycINFO and MEDLINE, which yielded 1875 records. Following abstract/title screening, 409 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 35 studies were included in the review. Studies prioritized surface-level (e.g., language) over deep-level dimensions (e.g., goals). Few studies used an adaptation framework. We discuss how researchers and clinicians can consider the unique experiences of coparenting in diverse communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00536-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00536-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前的研究是对不同家庭的父母干预进行范围审查,以评估参与父母的特征,需求和观点是如何解决的。我们遵循PRISMA-ScR指南。入选标准:参与者属于少数种族群体(≥50%样本);有关干预措施的研究报告;干预的目标是父母之间的关系或评估作为结果的父母。提取了人口统计学特征、研究和干预特征以及文化适应的过程和内容。最后一次系统搜索是在2025年4月,在PsycINFO和MEDLINE上进行的,得到了1875条记录。摘要/标题筛选后,409篇全文文章被纳入评估,35项研究被纳入综述。研究将表层(如语言)优先于深层(如目标)。很少有研究使用了适应框架。我们讨论了研究人员和临床医生如何考虑不同社区中养育子女的独特经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Culturally Relevant Coparenting Interventions for Diverse Families: A Scoping Review.

The current study is a scoping review on coparenting interventions with diverse families to assess how the characteristics, needs, and perspectives of participating coparents are addressed. We followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Eligibility criteria: participants belonged to racially minoritized groups (≥ 50% sample); studies reported on an intervention; the intervention targeted the coparental relationship OR assessed coparenting as an outcome. Demographics, study, and intervention characteristics, and the process and content of cultural adaptation were extracted. A systematic search was last executed in April 2025 in PsycINFO and MEDLINE, which yielded 1875 records. Following abstract/title screening, 409 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 35 studies were included in the review. Studies prioritized surface-level (e.g., language) over deep-level dimensions (e.g., goals). Few studies used an adaptation framework. We discuss how researchers and clinicians can consider the unique experiences of coparenting in diverse communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信