{"title":"慷慨和公平:印度和加拿大儿童对合作伙伴的偏好。","authors":"John Corbit","doi":"10.1037/dev0001998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treating cooperative partners fairly is hypothesized to be an adaptive strategy to maintain cooperative relationships. Indeed, emerging evidence suggests that adults prefer to cooperate with partners who are likely to treat them fairly, but to date little is known about how children's developing concern for fairness influences cooperative partner choice or how these preferences may vary across societies. This study investigated whether children prefer cooperative partners who are fair (discard a resource to avoid advantageous or disadvantageous distributions) or who efficiently distribute resources but create inequality (give a resource to create either advantageous or disadvantageous distributions). We recruited <i>N</i> = 252 children (4-9 years of age, <i>N</i> = 131 Female) from India and Canada. Children learned about the resource allocation behavior of two potential partners for a cooperative game. Each partner received one candy for themselves, one for a peer, and had an extra candy to either distribute (creating inequality) or discard (creating equality). On advantageous trials, partners could keep or discard the extra candy; on disadvantageous trials, they could give it to a peer or discard it. In both countries, children showed a greater tendency to choose partners who achieve equality by giving up a personal advantage, over those who achieve equality by preventing a partner from gaining an advantage, a tendency that increased with age. These findings reveal that children across diverse societies prefer cooperative partners who behave fairly by giving up a personal advantage and those who behave generously by allowing their partners to gain an advantage. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1875-1887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generous and fair: Children's preferences for cooperative partners in India and Canada.\",\"authors\":\"John Corbit\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/dev0001998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Treating cooperative partners fairly is hypothesized to be an adaptive strategy to maintain cooperative relationships. Indeed, emerging evidence suggests that adults prefer to cooperate with partners who are likely to treat them fairly, but to date little is known about how children's developing concern for fairness influences cooperative partner choice or how these preferences may vary across societies. This study investigated whether children prefer cooperative partners who are fair (discard a resource to avoid advantageous or disadvantageous distributions) or who efficiently distribute resources but create inequality (give a resource to create either advantageous or disadvantageous distributions). We recruited <i>N</i> = 252 children (4-9 years of age, <i>N</i> = 131 Female) from India and Canada. Children learned about the resource allocation behavior of two potential partners for a cooperative game. Each partner received one candy for themselves, one for a peer, and had an extra candy to either distribute (creating inequality) or discard (creating equality). On advantageous trials, partners could keep or discard the extra candy; on disadvantageous trials, they could give it to a peer or discard it. In both countries, children showed a greater tendency to choose partners who achieve equality by giving up a personal advantage, over those who achieve equality by preventing a partner from gaining an advantage, a tendency that increased with age. These findings reveal that children across diverse societies prefer cooperative partners who behave fairly by giving up a personal advantage and those who behave generously by allowing their partners to gain an advantage. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1875-1887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001998\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001998","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
公平对待合作伙伴被认为是维持合作关系的一种适应性策略。的确,新出现的证据表明,成年人更喜欢与可能公平对待他们的伙伴合作,但迄今为止,人们对儿童对公平的关注如何影响合作伙伴的选择,以及这些偏好在不同社会中如何变化知之甚少。本研究调查了儿童是否更喜欢公平的合作伙伴(放弃资源以避免有利或不利的分配)或有效分配资源但造成不平等的合作伙伴(给予资源以造成有利或不利的分配)。我们从印度和加拿大招募了N = 252名儿童(4-9岁,N = 131名女性)。孩子们在合作游戏中学习了两个潜在伙伴的资源分配行为。每个伙伴各自得到一颗糖果,一颗给同伴,另外还有一颗糖果可以分发(造成不平等)或丢弃(造成平等)。在有利的试验中,合作伙伴可以保留或丢弃多余的糖果;在不利的试验中,他们可以把它交给同伴,也可以把它扔掉。在这两个国家,孩子们更倾向于选择那些通过放弃个人优势来实现平等的伴侣,而不是那些通过阻止伴侣获得优势来实现平等的伴侣,这种趋势随着年龄的增长而增加。这些发现表明,在不同的社会中,孩子们更喜欢那些通过放弃个人优势而表现得公平的合作伙伴,以及那些通过允许伴侣获得优势而表现得慷慨的伙伴。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Generous and fair: Children's preferences for cooperative partners in India and Canada.
Treating cooperative partners fairly is hypothesized to be an adaptive strategy to maintain cooperative relationships. Indeed, emerging evidence suggests that adults prefer to cooperate with partners who are likely to treat them fairly, but to date little is known about how children's developing concern for fairness influences cooperative partner choice or how these preferences may vary across societies. This study investigated whether children prefer cooperative partners who are fair (discard a resource to avoid advantageous or disadvantageous distributions) or who efficiently distribute resources but create inequality (give a resource to create either advantageous or disadvantageous distributions). We recruited N = 252 children (4-9 years of age, N = 131 Female) from India and Canada. Children learned about the resource allocation behavior of two potential partners for a cooperative game. Each partner received one candy for themselves, one for a peer, and had an extra candy to either distribute (creating inequality) or discard (creating equality). On advantageous trials, partners could keep or discard the extra candy; on disadvantageous trials, they could give it to a peer or discard it. In both countries, children showed a greater tendency to choose partners who achieve equality by giving up a personal advantage, over those who achieve equality by preventing a partner from gaining an advantage, a tendency that increased with age. These findings reveal that children across diverse societies prefer cooperative partners who behave fairly by giving up a personal advantage and those who behave generously by allowing their partners to gain an advantage. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.