[不同严重程度双侧膝骨关节炎患者代偿机制的差异]。

Q3 Medicine
Bo Hu, Junqing Wang, Hui Zhang, Tao Deng, Yong Nie, Kang Li
{"title":"[不同严重程度双侧膝骨关节炎患者代偿机制的差异]。","authors":"Bo Hu, Junqing Wang, Hui Zhang, Tao Deng, Yong Nie, Kang Li","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202503114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the load distribution on the more painful and less painful limbs in patients with mild-to-moderate and severe bilateral knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and explore the compensatory mechanisms in both limbs among bilateral KOA patients with different severity levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 113 participants were enrolled between July 2022 and September 2023. This cohort comprised 43 patients with mild-to-moderate bilateral KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3), 43 patients with severe bilateral KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4), and 27 healthy volunteers (healthy control group). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, passive knee range of motion (ROM), and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) were used to assess walking pain intensity, joint function, and lower limb alignment in KOA patients, respectively. Motion trajectories of reflective markers and ground reaction force data during walking were captured using a gait analysis system. Musculoskeletal modeling was then employed to calculate biomechanical parameters, including the peak knee adduction moment (KAM), KAM impulse, peak joint contact force (JCF), and peak medial/lateral contact forces (MCF/LCF). Statistical analyses were performed to compare differences in clinical and gait parameters between bilateral limbs. Additionally, one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was utilized to analyze temporal gait data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mild-to-moderate KOA patients showed the significantly higher HSS score (67.7±7.9) than severe KOA patients (51.9±8.9; <i>t</i>=8.747, <i>P</i><0.001). The more painful limb in all KOA patients exhibited significantly greater HKA and higher VAS scores compared to the less painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05). While bilateral knee ROM did not differ significantly in mild-to-moderate KOA patients ( <i>P</i>>0.05), the severe KOA patients had significantly reduced ROM in the more painful limb versus the less painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05). Healthy controls showed no significant bilateral difference in any biomechanical parameters ( <i>P</i>>0.05). All KOA patients demonstrated longer stance time on the less painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05). Critically, severe KOA patients exhibited significantly higher peak KAM, KAM impulse, and peak MCF in the more painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05), while mild-to-moderate KOA patients showed the opposite pattern with lower peak KAM and KAM impulse in the more painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05) and a similar trend for peak MCF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with mild-to-moderate KOA effectively reduce load on the more painful limb through compensatory mechanisms in the less painful limb. Conversely, severe bilateral varus deformities in advanced KOA patients nullify compensatory capacity in the less painful limb, paradoxically increasing load on the more painful limb. This dichotomy necessitates personalized management strategies tailored to disease severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 7","pages":"861-868"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Difference of compensatory mechanisms in bilateral knee osteoarthritis patients of varying severity].\",\"authors\":\"Bo Hu, Junqing Wang, Hui Zhang, Tao Deng, Yong Nie, Kang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.7507/1002-1892.202503114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the load distribution on the more painful and less painful limbs in patients with mild-to-moderate and severe bilateral knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and explore the compensatory mechanisms in both limbs among bilateral KOA patients with different severity levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 113 participants were enrolled between July 2022 and September 2023. This cohort comprised 43 patients with mild-to-moderate bilateral KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3), 43 patients with severe bilateral KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4), and 27 healthy volunteers (healthy control group). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, passive knee range of motion (ROM), and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) were used to assess walking pain intensity, joint function, and lower limb alignment in KOA patients, respectively. Motion trajectories of reflective markers and ground reaction force data during walking were captured using a gait analysis system. Musculoskeletal modeling was then employed to calculate biomechanical parameters, including the peak knee adduction moment (KAM), KAM impulse, peak joint contact force (JCF), and peak medial/lateral contact forces (MCF/LCF). Statistical analyses were performed to compare differences in clinical and gait parameters between bilateral limbs. Additionally, one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was utilized to analyze temporal gait data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mild-to-moderate KOA patients showed the significantly higher HSS score (67.7±7.9) than severe KOA patients (51.9±8.9; <i>t</i>=8.747, <i>P</i><0.001). The more painful limb in all KOA patients exhibited significantly greater HKA and higher VAS scores compared to the less painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05). While bilateral knee ROM did not differ significantly in mild-to-moderate KOA patients ( <i>P</i>>0.05), the severe KOA patients had significantly reduced ROM in the more painful limb versus the less painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05). Healthy controls showed no significant bilateral difference in any biomechanical parameters ( <i>P</i>>0.05). All KOA patients demonstrated longer stance time on the less painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05). Critically, severe KOA patients exhibited significantly higher peak KAM, KAM impulse, and peak MCF in the more painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05), while mild-to-moderate KOA patients showed the opposite pattern with lower peak KAM and KAM impulse in the more painful limb ( <i>P</i><0.05) and a similar trend for peak MCF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with mild-to-moderate KOA effectively reduce load on the more painful limb through compensatory mechanisms in the less painful limb. Conversely, severe bilateral varus deformities in advanced KOA patients nullify compensatory capacity in the less painful limb, paradoxically increasing load on the more painful limb. This dichotomy necessitates personalized management strategies tailored to disease severity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国修复重建外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"39 7\",\"pages\":\"861-868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279917/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国修复重建外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202503114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202503114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究轻、中、重度双侧膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者疼痛加重肢和疼痛减轻肢的负荷分布,探讨不同严重程度双侧膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者两肢的代偿机制。方法:在2022年7月至2023年9月期间,共有113名参与者入组。该队列包括43例轻度至中度双侧KOA患者(Kellgren-Lawrence分级2-3级),43例重度双侧KOA患者(Kellgren-Lawrence分级4级)和27名健康志愿者(健康对照组)。采用视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)、特殊外科医院(HSS)评分、被动膝关节活动度(ROM)和髋关节-膝关节-踝关节角度(HKA)分别评估KOA患者的步行疼痛强度、关节功能和下肢直线。使用步态分析系统捕获了行走过程中反射标记物的运动轨迹和地面反作用力数据。然后利用肌肉骨骼模型计算生物力学参数,包括膝关节内收力矩峰值(KAM)、KAM冲量峰值、关节接触力峰值(JCF)和内侧/外侧接触力峰值(MCF/LCF)。统计分析比较两肢临床和步态参数的差异。此外,一维统计参数映射用于分析时间步态数据。结果:轻中度KOA患者HSS评分(67.7±7.9)明显高于重度KOA患者(51.9±8.9);t=8.747, PPP>0.05),重度KOA患者疼痛较轻肢的ROM明显减少(PP>0 0.05)。结论:轻至中度KOA患者通过轻痛肢体代偿机制有效减轻了重痛肢体的负荷。相反,晚期KOA患者严重的双侧内翻畸形使疼痛程度较轻的肢体代偿能力无效,反而增加了疼痛程度较重的肢体的负荷。这种二分法需要根据疾病严重程度量身定制个性化管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Difference of compensatory mechanisms in bilateral knee osteoarthritis patients of varying severity].

Objective: To investigate the load distribution on the more painful and less painful limbs in patients with mild-to-moderate and severe bilateral knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and explore the compensatory mechanisms in both limbs among bilateral KOA patients with different severity levels.

Methods: A total of 113 participants were enrolled between July 2022 and September 2023. This cohort comprised 43 patients with mild-to-moderate bilateral KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3), 43 patients with severe bilateral KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4), and 27 healthy volunteers (healthy control group). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, passive knee range of motion (ROM), and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) were used to assess walking pain intensity, joint function, and lower limb alignment in KOA patients, respectively. Motion trajectories of reflective markers and ground reaction force data during walking were captured using a gait analysis system. Musculoskeletal modeling was then employed to calculate biomechanical parameters, including the peak knee adduction moment (KAM), KAM impulse, peak joint contact force (JCF), and peak medial/lateral contact forces (MCF/LCF). Statistical analyses were performed to compare differences in clinical and gait parameters between bilateral limbs. Additionally, one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was utilized to analyze temporal gait data.

Results: Mild-to-moderate KOA patients showed the significantly higher HSS score (67.7±7.9) than severe KOA patients (51.9±8.9; t=8.747, P<0.001). The more painful limb in all KOA patients exhibited significantly greater HKA and higher VAS scores compared to the less painful limb ( P<0.05). While bilateral knee ROM did not differ significantly in mild-to-moderate KOA patients ( P>0.05), the severe KOA patients had significantly reduced ROM in the more painful limb versus the less painful limb ( P<0.05). Healthy controls showed no significant bilateral difference in any biomechanical parameters ( P>0.05). All KOA patients demonstrated longer stance time on the less painful limb ( P<0.05). Critically, severe KOA patients exhibited significantly higher peak KAM, KAM impulse, and peak MCF in the more painful limb ( P<0.05), while mild-to-moderate KOA patients showed the opposite pattern with lower peak KAM and KAM impulse in the more painful limb ( P<0.05) and a similar trend for peak MCF.

Conclusion: Patients with mild-to-moderate KOA effectively reduce load on the more painful limb through compensatory mechanisms in the less painful limb. Conversely, severe bilateral varus deformities in advanced KOA patients nullify compensatory capacity in the less painful limb, paradoxically increasing load on the more painful limb. This dichotomy necessitates personalized management strategies tailored to disease severity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信