{"title":"颈部剥离后颈肩功能损害:IIb级保留与常规颈部剥离的随机对照试验中角形测量、肌电图和纸笔工具的比较研究","authors":"Senniappan Karthikeyan, Deepika Joshi, Abhishek Pathak, Manoj Pandey","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03931-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical management of oral cancer poses significant challenges due to the proximity of critical nerves, like spinal accessory, which increases the risk of inadvertent damage or neuropraxia during surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial enrolled 32 patients with histologically confirmed oral cavity carcinoma and clinically and radiologically negative cervical neck nodes. Patients were assigned to either level IIb-preserving or conventional selective neck dissection. Shoulder function was evaluated using goniometry, electromyography (EMG), and the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII). Outcomes from these three assessment methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited impaired spinal accessory nerve function. In the IIb-preserving group, EMG detected impairment in 50% of patients, compared to 95% in the control group. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups across all three assessment methods. However, EMG and goniometry indicated functional recovery at 6 and 12 months, whereas NDII scores remained significantly different at 12 months, despite full nerve recovery observed on EMG and goniometry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrates agreement between shoulder function measurements (goniometry and EMG) but discordance with NDII. This discrepancy may arise from the distinct constructs used by NDII to assess neck dissection impairment, highlighting potential limitations in its sensitivity to functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Senniappan Karthikeyan, Deepika Joshi, Abhishek Pathak, Manoj Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12957-025-03931-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical management of oral cancer poses significant challenges due to the proximity of critical nerves, like spinal accessory, which increases the risk of inadvertent damage or neuropraxia during surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial enrolled 32 patients with histologically confirmed oral cavity carcinoma and clinically and radiologically negative cervical neck nodes. Patients were assigned to either level IIb-preserving or conventional selective neck dissection. Shoulder function was evaluated using goniometry, electromyography (EMG), and the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII). Outcomes from these three assessment methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited impaired spinal accessory nerve function. In the IIb-preserving group, EMG detected impairment in 50% of patients, compared to 95% in the control group. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups across all three assessment methods. However, EMG and goniometry indicated functional recovery at 6 and 12 months, whereas NDII scores remained significantly different at 12 months, despite full nerve recovery observed on EMG and goniometry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrates agreement between shoulder function measurements (goniometry and EMG) but discordance with NDII. This discrepancy may arise from the distinct constructs used by NDII to assess neck dissection impairment, highlighting potential limitations in its sensitivity to functional recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03931-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03931-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection.
Background: Surgical management of oral cancer poses significant challenges due to the proximity of critical nerves, like spinal accessory, which increases the risk of inadvertent damage or neuropraxia during surgery.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial enrolled 32 patients with histologically confirmed oral cavity carcinoma and clinically and radiologically negative cervical neck nodes. Patients were assigned to either level IIb-preserving or conventional selective neck dissection. Shoulder function was evaluated using goniometry, electromyography (EMG), and the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII). Outcomes from these three assessment methods were compared.
Results: Both groups exhibited impaired spinal accessory nerve function. In the IIb-preserving group, EMG detected impairment in 50% of patients, compared to 95% in the control group. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups across all three assessment methods. However, EMG and goniometry indicated functional recovery at 6 and 12 months, whereas NDII scores remained significantly different at 12 months, despite full nerve recovery observed on EMG and goniometry.
Conclusions: The study demonstrates agreement between shoulder function measurements (goniometry and EMG) but discordance with NDII. This discrepancy may arise from the distinct constructs used by NDII to assess neck dissection impairment, highlighting potential limitations in its sensitivity to functional recovery.
期刊介绍:
World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics.
Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.