用内部生产的基于vfa的碳源代替甲醇在Henriksdal污水处理厂进行反硝化。

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Water Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.2166/wst.2025.086
Andrea Carranza Muñoz, Andriy Malovanyy, Abhijeet Singh, Christian Baresel, Jesper Karlsson, Kristina Stark-Fujii, Anna Schnürer
{"title":"用内部生产的基于vfa的碳源代替甲醇在Henriksdal污水处理厂进行反硝化。","authors":"Andrea Carranza Muñoz, Andriy Malovanyy, Abhijeet Singh, Christian Baresel, Jesper Karlsson, Kristina Stark-Fujii, Anna Schnürer","doi":"10.2166/wst.2025.086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To meet future nitrogen removal targets, Henriksdal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) will require external carbon addition, estimated at 8 tons COD/day by 2040, due to low influent BOD/TN ratios, precipitation chemical use, and low temperatures. Methanol, the projected option, is fossil-based and contributes to indirect greenhouse gas emissions. This study evaluated a volatile fatty acid (VFA)-based fermentate produced from primary sludge and food waste in a 2 m<sup>3</sup> mesophilic fermenter as a carbon source for denitrification. The filtrated fermentate was tested as carbon source in both batch denitrification tests and pilot-scale MBR (4.5 m<sup>3</sup>/h), where it was dosed for 70 days, replacing glycerol currently used at Henriksdal and Henriksdals WWTP. In batch tests, the fermentate achieved a 40% higher denitrification rate than glycerol. Pilot trials showed a 30% higher denitrification rate and 50% lower carbon consumption while maintaining effluent concentration below 3 mg NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> -N/L. Microbial analysis revealed no significant community changes with the carbon source transition, indicating effective VFA uptake by existing microorganisms. Full-scale projections suggested that replacing methanol would require 10% of the plant's primary sludge plus food waste. Although this sludge use would reduce biogas production, methane potential tests showed that recycling of the fermentate solid fraction would result in only 2% lower biogas production, representing a minor trade-off.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"92 1","pages":"139-152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Replacing methanol with internally produced VFA-based carbon source for denitrification at the Henriksdal WWTP.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Carranza Muñoz, Andriy Malovanyy, Abhijeet Singh, Christian Baresel, Jesper Karlsson, Kristina Stark-Fujii, Anna Schnürer\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wst.2025.086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To meet future nitrogen removal targets, Henriksdal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) will require external carbon addition, estimated at 8 tons COD/day by 2040, due to low influent BOD/TN ratios, precipitation chemical use, and low temperatures. Methanol, the projected option, is fossil-based and contributes to indirect greenhouse gas emissions. This study evaluated a volatile fatty acid (VFA)-based fermentate produced from primary sludge and food waste in a 2 m<sup>3</sup> mesophilic fermenter as a carbon source for denitrification. The filtrated fermentate was tested as carbon source in both batch denitrification tests and pilot-scale MBR (4.5 m<sup>3</sup>/h), where it was dosed for 70 days, replacing glycerol currently used at Henriksdal and Henriksdals WWTP. In batch tests, the fermentate achieved a 40% higher denitrification rate than glycerol. Pilot trials showed a 30% higher denitrification rate and 50% lower carbon consumption while maintaining effluent concentration below 3 mg NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> -N/L. Microbial analysis revealed no significant community changes with the carbon source transition, indicating effective VFA uptake by existing microorganisms. Full-scale projections suggested that replacing methanol would require 10% of the plant's primary sludge plus food waste. Although this sludge use would reduce biogas production, methane potential tests showed that recycling of the fermentate solid fraction would result in only 2% lower biogas production, representing a minor trade-off.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"139-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2025.086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2025.086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现未来的除氮目标,Henriksdal污水处理厂(WWTP)将需要外部加碳,到2040年,由于进水BOD/TN比低、沉淀化学物质使用和低温,估计需要8 吨COD/天。预计的选择是甲醇,它是一种基于化石的燃料,会间接排放温室气体。本研究评估了一种挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)为基础的发酵液,该发酵液由初级污泥和食物垃圾在一个2立方米的中温发酵罐中产生,作为反硝化的碳源。过滤后的发酵液在间歇反硝化试验和中试MBR (4.5 m3/h)中作为碳源进行了测试,在中试MBR中添加了70天的碳源,取代了Henriksdal和Henriksdals污水处理厂目前使用的甘油。在批量试验中,发酵液的反硝化率比甘油高40%。中试结果表明,在污水浓度低于3 mg NO3- - n /L的情况下,反硝化率提高30%,碳耗降低50%。微生物分析显示,随着碳源的转换,群落结构没有明显变化,表明现有微生物对VFA的吸收是有效的。全面的预测表明,替代甲醇将需要工厂10%的初级污泥和食物垃圾。虽然这种污泥的使用会减少沼气的产量,但甲烷潜力测试表明,循环利用发酵固体部分只会导致沼气产量降低2%,这是一个很小的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Replacing methanol with internally produced VFA-based carbon source for denitrification at the Henriksdal WWTP.

To meet future nitrogen removal targets, Henriksdal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) will require external carbon addition, estimated at 8 tons COD/day by 2040, due to low influent BOD/TN ratios, precipitation chemical use, and low temperatures. Methanol, the projected option, is fossil-based and contributes to indirect greenhouse gas emissions. This study evaluated a volatile fatty acid (VFA)-based fermentate produced from primary sludge and food waste in a 2 m3 mesophilic fermenter as a carbon source for denitrification. The filtrated fermentate was tested as carbon source in both batch denitrification tests and pilot-scale MBR (4.5 m3/h), where it was dosed for 70 days, replacing glycerol currently used at Henriksdal and Henriksdals WWTP. In batch tests, the fermentate achieved a 40% higher denitrification rate than glycerol. Pilot trials showed a 30% higher denitrification rate and 50% lower carbon consumption while maintaining effluent concentration below 3 mg NO3- -N/L. Microbial analysis revealed no significant community changes with the carbon source transition, indicating effective VFA uptake by existing microorganisms. Full-scale projections suggested that replacing methanol would require 10% of the plant's primary sludge plus food waste. Although this sludge use would reduce biogas production, methane potential tests showed that recycling of the fermentate solid fraction would result in only 2% lower biogas production, representing a minor trade-off.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Science and Technology
Water Science and Technology 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
366
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信