低结晶或无结晶二氧化硅工程石粉尘的物理化学特征和膜分解活性及其毒理学评价意义。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Chandnee Ramkissoon, Cristina Pavan, Jasmine Rita Petriglieri, Marianna Fimiani, Dino Pisaniello, Sharyn Gaskin, Francesco Turci
{"title":"低结晶或无结晶二氧化硅工程石粉尘的物理化学特征和膜分解活性及其毒理学评价意义。","authors":"Chandnee Ramkissoon, Cristina Pavan, Jasmine Rita Petriglieri, Marianna Fimiani, Dino Pisaniello, Sharyn Gaskin, Francesco Turci","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-10460-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The re-emergence of silicosis among engineered stone (ES) workers has prompted the development of low- to no-crystalline silica (SiO<sub>2</sub>) ES products, marketed as safer alternatives to traditional high-SiO<sub>2</sub> ES. However, the composition of these new materials-often incorporating recycled minerals, binders, and pigments-remains complex and poorly characterized in terms of potential health risks. This study assessed the physico-chemical properties and membranolytic activity of dusts generated by mechanical processing of five ES samples (ranging from 90 to 0 wt% SiO<sub>2</sub>) and a natural stone as comparison. Dusts were analyzed for particle size distribution, mineralogy, morphology and zeta potential. A standard membranolysis assay was used to assess relative cytotoxicity. Dusts from new ES slabs contained lower quartz and cristobalite levels (23 to 0 wt%) than traditional ES, with crystalline silica replaced predominantly by silicates, aluminosilicates, amorphous phases, or gibbsite. Untreated ES dusts showed little membranolytic activity. However, after heating to remove organic binding resins, a high membranolytic activity was observed for traditional ES, and to a lesser degree for low-SiO<sub>2</sub> ES. No activity was observed in no-SiO<sub>2</sub> ES, composed primarily of gibbsite. Our findings suggest that reducing crystalline silica content may mitigate certain toxicological risks. However, the diverse and evolving composition of alternative ES products warrants ongoing toxicological evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"25451"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physico-chemical features and membranolytic activity of dust from low or no crystalline silica engineered stone with implications for toxicological assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Chandnee Ramkissoon, Cristina Pavan, Jasmine Rita Petriglieri, Marianna Fimiani, Dino Pisaniello, Sharyn Gaskin, Francesco Turci\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-10460-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The re-emergence of silicosis among engineered stone (ES) workers has prompted the development of low- to no-crystalline silica (SiO<sub>2</sub>) ES products, marketed as safer alternatives to traditional high-SiO<sub>2</sub> ES. However, the composition of these new materials-often incorporating recycled minerals, binders, and pigments-remains complex and poorly characterized in terms of potential health risks. This study assessed the physico-chemical properties and membranolytic activity of dusts generated by mechanical processing of five ES samples (ranging from 90 to 0 wt% SiO<sub>2</sub>) and a natural stone as comparison. Dusts were analyzed for particle size distribution, mineralogy, morphology and zeta potential. A standard membranolysis assay was used to assess relative cytotoxicity. Dusts from new ES slabs contained lower quartz and cristobalite levels (23 to 0 wt%) than traditional ES, with crystalline silica replaced predominantly by silicates, aluminosilicates, amorphous phases, or gibbsite. Untreated ES dusts showed little membranolytic activity. However, after heating to remove organic binding resins, a high membranolytic activity was observed for traditional ES, and to a lesser degree for low-SiO<sub>2</sub> ES. No activity was observed in no-SiO<sub>2</sub> ES, composed primarily of gibbsite. Our findings suggest that reducing crystalline silica content may mitigate certain toxicological risks. However, the diverse and evolving composition of alternative ES products warrants ongoing toxicological evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"25451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259935/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10460-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10460-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在工程石材(ES)工人中矽肺病的重新出现促使了低晶至无晶二氧化硅(SiO2) ES产品的发展,作为传统高SiO2 ES的更安全替代品销售。然而,这些新材料的成分——通常含有回收矿物、粘合剂和颜料——仍然很复杂,而且在潜在的健康风险方面特征不明显。本研究评估了5个ES样品(SiO2含量在90 - 0 wt%之间)和一个天然石材的机械加工产生的粉尘的物理化学性质和膜分解活性。分析了粉尘的粒度分布、矿物学、形貌和zeta电位。采用标准的膜溶解法评估相对细胞毒性。与传统ES相比,新ES板的粉尘中石英和方石英含量(23%至0%)较低,晶体二氧化硅主要被硅酸盐、铝硅酸盐、无定形相或三沸石所取代。未经处理的ES粉尘几乎没有膜分解活性。然而,加热去除有机结合树脂后,传统ES的膜分解活性较高,而低sio2 ES的膜分解活性较低。在主要由三水石组成的无sio2 ES中未观察到活性。我们的研究结果表明,减少结晶二氧化硅含量可能会减轻某些毒理学风险。然而,替代ES产品的多样性和不断发展的成分值得进行毒理学评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Physico-chemical features and membranolytic activity of dust from low or no crystalline silica engineered stone with implications for toxicological assessment.

Physico-chemical features and membranolytic activity of dust from low or no crystalline silica engineered stone with implications for toxicological assessment.

Physico-chemical features and membranolytic activity of dust from low or no crystalline silica engineered stone with implications for toxicological assessment.

Physico-chemical features and membranolytic activity of dust from low or no crystalline silica engineered stone with implications for toxicological assessment.

The re-emergence of silicosis among engineered stone (ES) workers has prompted the development of low- to no-crystalline silica (SiO2) ES products, marketed as safer alternatives to traditional high-SiO2 ES. However, the composition of these new materials-often incorporating recycled minerals, binders, and pigments-remains complex and poorly characterized in terms of potential health risks. This study assessed the physico-chemical properties and membranolytic activity of dusts generated by mechanical processing of five ES samples (ranging from 90 to 0 wt% SiO2) and a natural stone as comparison. Dusts were analyzed for particle size distribution, mineralogy, morphology and zeta potential. A standard membranolysis assay was used to assess relative cytotoxicity. Dusts from new ES slabs contained lower quartz and cristobalite levels (23 to 0 wt%) than traditional ES, with crystalline silica replaced predominantly by silicates, aluminosilicates, amorphous phases, or gibbsite. Untreated ES dusts showed little membranolytic activity. However, after heating to remove organic binding resins, a high membranolytic activity was observed for traditional ES, and to a lesser degree for low-SiO2 ES. No activity was observed in no-SiO2 ES, composed primarily of gibbsite. Our findings suggest that reducing crystalline silica content may mitigate certain toxicological risks. However, the diverse and evolving composition of alternative ES products warrants ongoing toxicological evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信