使用机器学习算法预测结直肠癌患者肠系膜完全切除后心力衰竭的危险因素。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yuan Liu, Yuankun Liu, Yu Zhang, Pengpeng Zhang, Jiaheng Xie, Ning Zhao, Yi Xie, Chao Cheng, Songyun Zhao
{"title":"使用机器学习算法预测结直肠癌患者肠系膜完全切除后心力衰竭的危险因素。","authors":"Yuan Liu, Yuankun Liu, Yu Zhang, Pengpeng Zhang, Jiaheng Xie, Ning Zhao, Yi Xie, Chao Cheng, Songyun Zhao","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-11726-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following complete mesocolic excision (CME), heart failure (HF) emerges as a significant complication, exerting substantial impacts on both short-term and long-term patient prognoses. The primary objective of our investigation was to develop a machine learning model capable of discerning preoperative and intraoperative high-risk factors, facilitating the prediction of HF occurrence subsequent to CME. A cohort comprising 1158 patients diagnosed with colon cancer was enrolled in our study, encompassing 172 individuals who developed postoperative HF. We compiled 37 feature variables, spanning patient demographic traits, foundational medical histories, preoperative examination characteristics, surgery types, and intraoperative details. Four distinct machine learning algorithms-extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN)-were employed to construct the model. The k-fold cross-validation method, ROC curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and external validation were employed for comprehensive model evaluation. The XGBoost algorithm exhibited superior performance compared to the other three prediction models. Specifically, within the training set of the internal validation set, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated an AUC value of 0.990 (0.983-0.996), accuracy of 0.929 (0.923-0.935), sensitivity of 0.983 (0.976-0.990), specificity of 0.918 (0.910-0.927), and F1 value of 0.799 (0.784-0.814). In the validation set of the internal validation set, the XGBoost algorithm recorded an AUC value of 0.941 (0.890-0.991), accuracy of 0.897 (0.882-0.911), sensitivity of 0.898 (0.860-0.937), specificity of 0.875 (0.845-0.905), and F1 value of 0.711 (0.656-0.766). The AUC value for the external validation set was 0.93, indicating robust extrapolative capabilities of the XGBoost prediction model. The HF prediction model post-CME, derived from the XGBoost machine learning algorithm in this study, attests to its elevated predictive accuracy and clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"25441"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors of heart failure after complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Liu, Yuankun Liu, Yu Zhang, Pengpeng Zhang, Jiaheng Xie, Ning Zhao, Yi Xie, Chao Cheng, Songyun Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-11726-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Following complete mesocolic excision (CME), heart failure (HF) emerges as a significant complication, exerting substantial impacts on both short-term and long-term patient prognoses. The primary objective of our investigation was to develop a machine learning model capable of discerning preoperative and intraoperative high-risk factors, facilitating the prediction of HF occurrence subsequent to CME. A cohort comprising 1158 patients diagnosed with colon cancer was enrolled in our study, encompassing 172 individuals who developed postoperative HF. We compiled 37 feature variables, spanning patient demographic traits, foundational medical histories, preoperative examination characteristics, surgery types, and intraoperative details. Four distinct machine learning algorithms-extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN)-were employed to construct the model. The k-fold cross-validation method, ROC curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and external validation were employed for comprehensive model evaluation. The XGBoost algorithm exhibited superior performance compared to the other three prediction models. Specifically, within the training set of the internal validation set, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated an AUC value of 0.990 (0.983-0.996), accuracy of 0.929 (0.923-0.935), sensitivity of 0.983 (0.976-0.990), specificity of 0.918 (0.910-0.927), and F1 value of 0.799 (0.784-0.814). In the validation set of the internal validation set, the XGBoost algorithm recorded an AUC value of 0.941 (0.890-0.991), accuracy of 0.897 (0.882-0.911), sensitivity of 0.898 (0.860-0.937), specificity of 0.875 (0.845-0.905), and F1 value of 0.711 (0.656-0.766). The AUC value for the external validation set was 0.93, indicating robust extrapolative capabilities of the XGBoost prediction model. The HF prediction model post-CME, derived from the XGBoost machine learning algorithm in this study, attests to its elevated predictive accuracy and clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"25441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259990/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11726-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11726-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全肠系膜切除(CME)后,心力衰竭(HF)成为一个重要的并发症,对患者的短期和长期预后都有重大影响。我们研究的主要目的是开发一种能够识别术前和术中高危因素的机器学习模型,以促进CME后HF发生的预测。我们的研究纳入了1158名诊断为结肠癌的患者,其中包括172名术后心衰患者。我们编制了37个特征变量,包括患者人口统计学特征、基础病史、术前检查特征、手术类型和术中细节。四种不同的机器学习算法——极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和k-最近邻算法(KNN)——被用来构建模型。采用k-fold交叉验证法、ROC曲线、校准曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)和外部验证法对模型进行综合评价。与其他三种预测模型相比,XGBoost算法表现出更好的性能。其中,在内部验证集的训练集中,XGBoost算法的AUC值为0.990(0.983 ~ 0.996),准确率为0.929(0.923 ~ 0.935),灵敏度为0.983(0.976 ~ 0.990),特异性为0.918 (0.910 ~ 0.927),F1值为0.799(0.784 ~ 0.814)。在内部验证集的验证集中,XGBoost算法的AUC值为0.941(0.890-0.991),准确率为0.897(0.882-0.911),灵敏度为0.898(0.860-0.937),特异性为0.875 (0.845-0.905),F1值为0.711(0.656-0.766)。外部验证集的AUC值为0.93,表明XGBoost预测模型具有强大的外推能力。在本研究中,基于XGBoost机器学习算法的cme后心衰预测模型证明了其较高的预测准确性和临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors of heart failure after complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer patients.

Using machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors of heart failure after complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer patients.

Using machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors of heart failure after complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer patients.

Using machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors of heart failure after complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer patients.

Following complete mesocolic excision (CME), heart failure (HF) emerges as a significant complication, exerting substantial impacts on both short-term and long-term patient prognoses. The primary objective of our investigation was to develop a machine learning model capable of discerning preoperative and intraoperative high-risk factors, facilitating the prediction of HF occurrence subsequent to CME. A cohort comprising 1158 patients diagnosed with colon cancer was enrolled in our study, encompassing 172 individuals who developed postoperative HF. We compiled 37 feature variables, spanning patient demographic traits, foundational medical histories, preoperative examination characteristics, surgery types, and intraoperative details. Four distinct machine learning algorithms-extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN)-were employed to construct the model. The k-fold cross-validation method, ROC curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and external validation were employed for comprehensive model evaluation. The XGBoost algorithm exhibited superior performance compared to the other three prediction models. Specifically, within the training set of the internal validation set, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated an AUC value of 0.990 (0.983-0.996), accuracy of 0.929 (0.923-0.935), sensitivity of 0.983 (0.976-0.990), specificity of 0.918 (0.910-0.927), and F1 value of 0.799 (0.784-0.814). In the validation set of the internal validation set, the XGBoost algorithm recorded an AUC value of 0.941 (0.890-0.991), accuracy of 0.897 (0.882-0.911), sensitivity of 0.898 (0.860-0.937), specificity of 0.875 (0.845-0.905), and F1 value of 0.711 (0.656-0.766). The AUC value for the external validation set was 0.93, indicating robust extrapolative capabilities of the XGBoost prediction model. The HF prediction model post-CME, derived from the XGBoost machine learning algorithm in this study, attests to its elevated predictive accuracy and clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信