综合初级保健统一协议的简短小组改编:通过远程医疗提供的跨诊断干预的公开试验。

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Robyn L Shepardson, Nicola F De Paul, Kelly A Caver, David J Giard, Jennifer S Funderburk
{"title":"综合初级保健统一协议的简短小组改编:通过远程医疗提供的跨诊断干预的公开试验。","authors":"Robyn L Shepardson, Nicola F De Paul, Kelly A Caver, David J Giard, Jennifer S Funderburk","doi":"10.1037/ser0000983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a pressing need to scale up access to evidence-based mental health treatment. Offering transdiagnostic treatments that accommodate a variety of presenting concerns and comorbidities in integrated primary care settings via group format and telehealth modalities can help to efficiently increase access to care. To meet this need, we refined a brief group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders, called managing stress and emotions (MSE), which was modified for feasibility in integrated primary care settings and telehealth delivery. MSE comprises five 60-min classes emphasizing experiential skills-based learning. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of MSE while preliminarily evaluating effectiveness. We conducted an open trial with 18 patients (33% female, 89% White, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 47 years) experiencing anxiety, depression, or adjustment difficulties who were recruited from Veterans Health Administration primary care. Using mixed methods, we assessed mental health symptoms and functioning from pre- to posttreatment and 3-month follow-up as well as treatment feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. MSE was feasible (89% engaged), and patients reported high treatment satisfaction. Pre- to posttreatment changes were promising, with medium-to-large effect sizes, and treatment gains generally remained stable at 3-months. Mixed methods data showed increased awareness of emotions and more use of adaptive coping strategies after MSE. Findings suggest further research evaluating effectiveness and implementation is warranted, as this is the briefest version of group Unified Protocol that has been tested thus far and can help to efficiently increase access to mental health treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for integrated primary care: Open trial of a transdiagnostic intervention delivered via telehealth.\",\"authors\":\"Robyn L Shepardson, Nicola F De Paul, Kelly A Caver, David J Giard, Jennifer S Funderburk\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a pressing need to scale up access to evidence-based mental health treatment. Offering transdiagnostic treatments that accommodate a variety of presenting concerns and comorbidities in integrated primary care settings via group format and telehealth modalities can help to efficiently increase access to care. To meet this need, we refined a brief group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders, called managing stress and emotions (MSE), which was modified for feasibility in integrated primary care settings and telehealth delivery. MSE comprises five 60-min classes emphasizing experiential skills-based learning. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of MSE while preliminarily evaluating effectiveness. We conducted an open trial with 18 patients (33% female, 89% White, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 47 years) experiencing anxiety, depression, or adjustment difficulties who were recruited from Veterans Health Administration primary care. Using mixed methods, we assessed mental health symptoms and functioning from pre- to posttreatment and 3-month follow-up as well as treatment feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. MSE was feasible (89% engaged), and patients reported high treatment satisfaction. Pre- to posttreatment changes were promising, with medium-to-large effect sizes, and treatment gains generally remained stable at 3-months. Mixed methods data showed increased awareness of emotions and more use of adaptive coping strategies after MSE. Findings suggest further research evaluating effectiveness and implementation is warranted, as this is the briefest version of group Unified Protocol that has been tested thus far and can help to efficiently increase access to mental health treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000983\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迫切需要扩大获得循证精神卫生治疗的机会。在综合初级保健机构中,通过小组形式和远程保健方式提供适应各种表现问题和合并症的跨诊断治疗,有助于有效地增加获得护理的机会。为了满足这一需求,我们对情绪障碍的跨诊断治疗统一协议进行了简短的小组调整,称为管理压力和情绪(MSE),并对其进行了修改,以适应综合初级保健环境和远程医疗服务的可行性。MSE包括五个60分钟的课程,强调以体验技能为基础的学习。本试点研究评估了MSE的可行性和可接受性,并初步评估了有效性。我们对从退伍军人健康管理局初级保健中心招募的18名患有焦虑、抑郁或适应困难的患者(33%女性,89%白人,47岁)进行了一项公开试验。采用混合方法,从治疗前后和3个月的随访中评估心理健康症状和功能,以及治疗的可行性、可接受性和满意度。MSE是可行的(89%参与),患者报告了很高的治疗满意度。治疗前到治疗后的变化是有希望的,具有中到大的效应量,治疗收益通常在3个月时保持稳定。混合方法数据显示,MSE后情绪意识增强,更多地使用适应性应对策略。研究结果表明,评估有效性和实施的进一步研究是有必要的,因为这是迄今为止测试过的最简短的群体统一协议版本,可以帮助有效地增加获得精神卫生治疗的机会。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brief group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for integrated primary care: Open trial of a transdiagnostic intervention delivered via telehealth.

There is a pressing need to scale up access to evidence-based mental health treatment. Offering transdiagnostic treatments that accommodate a variety of presenting concerns and comorbidities in integrated primary care settings via group format and telehealth modalities can help to efficiently increase access to care. To meet this need, we refined a brief group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders, called managing stress and emotions (MSE), which was modified for feasibility in integrated primary care settings and telehealth delivery. MSE comprises five 60-min classes emphasizing experiential skills-based learning. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of MSE while preliminarily evaluating effectiveness. We conducted an open trial with 18 patients (33% female, 89% White, Mage = 47 years) experiencing anxiety, depression, or adjustment difficulties who were recruited from Veterans Health Administration primary care. Using mixed methods, we assessed mental health symptoms and functioning from pre- to posttreatment and 3-month follow-up as well as treatment feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. MSE was feasible (89% engaged), and patients reported high treatment satisfaction. Pre- to posttreatment changes were promising, with medium-to-large effect sizes, and treatment gains generally remained stable at 3-months. Mixed methods data showed increased awareness of emotions and more use of adaptive coping strategies after MSE. Findings suggest further research evaluating effectiveness and implementation is warranted, as this is the briefest version of group Unified Protocol that has been tested thus far and can help to efficiently increase access to mental health treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信