Faten Alhomoud, Walaa Alsaeed, Fatimah Alzainaldain, Kawthar Alelq, Farah Kais Alhomoud, Khalid A Alamer, Mohammed M Alsultan, Yousef Saeed Alqarni, Bashayer Alshehail, Abdullah A Alhifany
{"title":"三思而后行:了解沙特阿拉伯成年人的药物素养。","authors":"Faten Alhomoud, Walaa Alsaeed, Fatimah Alzainaldain, Kawthar Alelq, Farah Kais Alhomoud, Khalid A Alamer, Mohammed M Alsultan, Yousef Saeed Alqarni, Bashayer Alshehail, Abdullah A Alhifany","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S536578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor medication literacy may lead to serious health risks. Nevertheless, very little research has examined medication literacy in Saudi Arabia. Thus, this study assessed medication literacy and factors associated with poor medication literacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted, with eligibility criteria including individuals aged ≥ 18 years, speaking Arabic or English, and residing in Saudi Arabia. Eligible participants completed an online, self-administered survey disseminated through social media platforms over a two-month period. Horvat's Medication Literacy Assessment Questionnaire was employed. The analysis used regression in SPSS version 29 to identify predictors of medication literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 815 participants were included. Most were female (75.7%), aged 18-24 years (50.1%), and held undergraduate degree (47%). The median (IQR) medication literacy score, assessed using Horvat's Medication Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (score range: 0-29), was 22.0 (18-24). Results showed a relatively poor level of medication literacy, with 50% of participants scoring below the average of correct answers. Most problems were found in items related to dosing, requiring understanding information from longer texts and numerical skills. Other issues included refills, drug use in pregnancy, storage and disposal, expiration date, adverse effects, drug interactions, missed doses, label understanding, tablet splitting, and duration of therapy. Multiple linear regression revealed significant predictors. Lower educational levels were associated with reduced scores (β = -1.765, p = 0.009 for high school or below; β = -5.872, p = 0.016 for diploma). Smaller households were associated with higher scores (β = 1.252, p = 0.031 for 1-4 members; β = 1.255, p = 0.021 for 5-8 members). Prescription medications use (β = 2.375, p < 0.001) and less frequent pharmacists consultation (β = 3.602, p = 0.001) were positively associated with higher scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medication literacy among study participants requires improvement, especially in areas involving dosing instructions and numerical understanding. Targeted interventions are necessary for those with inadequate literacy levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"1973-1990"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Think Before You Take: Understanding Adult Medication Literacy in Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Faten Alhomoud, Walaa Alsaeed, Fatimah Alzainaldain, Kawthar Alelq, Farah Kais Alhomoud, Khalid A Alamer, Mohammed M Alsultan, Yousef Saeed Alqarni, Bashayer Alshehail, Abdullah A Alhifany\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S536578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor medication literacy may lead to serious health risks. Nevertheless, very little research has examined medication literacy in Saudi Arabia. Thus, this study assessed medication literacy and factors associated with poor medication literacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted, with eligibility criteria including individuals aged ≥ 18 years, speaking Arabic or English, and residing in Saudi Arabia. Eligible participants completed an online, self-administered survey disseminated through social media platforms over a two-month period. Horvat's Medication Literacy Assessment Questionnaire was employed. The analysis used regression in SPSS version 29 to identify predictors of medication literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 815 participants were included. Most were female (75.7%), aged 18-24 years (50.1%), and held undergraduate degree (47%). The median (IQR) medication literacy score, assessed using Horvat's Medication Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (score range: 0-29), was 22.0 (18-24). Results showed a relatively poor level of medication literacy, with 50% of participants scoring below the average of correct answers. Most problems were found in items related to dosing, requiring understanding information from longer texts and numerical skills. Other issues included refills, drug use in pregnancy, storage and disposal, expiration date, adverse effects, drug interactions, missed doses, label understanding, tablet splitting, and duration of therapy. Multiple linear regression revealed significant predictors. Lower educational levels were associated with reduced scores (β = -1.765, p = 0.009 for high school or below; β = -5.872, p = 0.016 for diploma). Smaller households were associated with higher scores (β = 1.252, p = 0.031 for 1-4 members; β = 1.255, p = 0.021 for 5-8 members). Prescription medications use (β = 2.375, p < 0.001) and less frequent pharmacists consultation (β = 3.602, p = 0.001) were positively associated with higher scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medication literacy among study participants requires improvement, especially in areas involving dosing instructions and numerical understanding. Targeted interventions are necessary for those with inadequate literacy levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"1973-1990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S536578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S536578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:不良的用药知识可能导致严重的健康风险。然而,很少有研究调查了沙特阿拉伯的药物素养。因此,本研究评估了药物素养和与不良药物素养相关的因素。方法:进行了一项描述性横断面研究,入选标准包括年龄≥18岁、讲阿拉伯语或英语、居住在沙特阿拉伯的个体。符合条件的参与者在两个月的时间里通过社交媒体平台完成了一项在线、自我管理的调查。采用Horvat药物素养评估问卷。分析使用SPSS版本29的回归来确定药物素养的预测因子。结果:共纳入815名受试者。多数为女性(75.7%),年龄18-24岁(50.1%),本科学历(47%)。使用Horvat药物素养评估问卷(评分范围:0-29)评估的中位数(IQR)药物素养得分为22.0(18-24)。结果显示,药物知识水平相对较低,50%的参与者的正确答案得分低于平均水平。大多数问题是在与剂量有关的项目中发现的,需要从较长的文本中理解信息和数字技能。其他问题包括重新配药、孕期用药、储存和处置、有效期、不良反应、药物相互作用、漏服剂量、标签理解、片剂分裂和治疗持续时间。多元线性回归显示显著的预测因子。较低的教育水平与较低的分数相关(β = -1.765, p = 0.009);β = -5.872, p = 0.016)。家庭规模越小得分越高(β = 1.252, p = 0.031);β = 1.255, p = 0.021(5-8个成员)。处方药物使用(β = 2.375, p < 0.001)和较少的药师咨询(β = 3.602, p = 0.001)与较高的得分呈正相关。结论:研究参与者的药物素养需要提高,特别是在剂量说明和数字理解方面。有针对性的干预措施对于识字水平不足的人是必要的。
Think Before You Take: Understanding Adult Medication Literacy in Saudi Arabia.
Background: Poor medication literacy may lead to serious health risks. Nevertheless, very little research has examined medication literacy in Saudi Arabia. Thus, this study assessed medication literacy and factors associated with poor medication literacy.
Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted, with eligibility criteria including individuals aged ≥ 18 years, speaking Arabic or English, and residing in Saudi Arabia. Eligible participants completed an online, self-administered survey disseminated through social media platforms over a two-month period. Horvat's Medication Literacy Assessment Questionnaire was employed. The analysis used regression in SPSS version 29 to identify predictors of medication literacy.
Results: A total of 815 participants were included. Most were female (75.7%), aged 18-24 years (50.1%), and held undergraduate degree (47%). The median (IQR) medication literacy score, assessed using Horvat's Medication Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (score range: 0-29), was 22.0 (18-24). Results showed a relatively poor level of medication literacy, with 50% of participants scoring below the average of correct answers. Most problems were found in items related to dosing, requiring understanding information from longer texts and numerical skills. Other issues included refills, drug use in pregnancy, storage and disposal, expiration date, adverse effects, drug interactions, missed doses, label understanding, tablet splitting, and duration of therapy. Multiple linear regression revealed significant predictors. Lower educational levels were associated with reduced scores (β = -1.765, p = 0.009 for high school or below; β = -5.872, p = 0.016 for diploma). Smaller households were associated with higher scores (β = 1.252, p = 0.031 for 1-4 members; β = 1.255, p = 0.021 for 5-8 members). Prescription medications use (β = 2.375, p < 0.001) and less frequent pharmacists consultation (β = 3.602, p = 0.001) were positively associated with higher scores.
Conclusion: Medication literacy among study participants requires improvement, especially in areas involving dosing instructions and numerical understanding. Targeted interventions are necessary for those with inadequate literacy levels.
期刊介绍:
Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.