2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状、社会支持和糖尿病困扰的网络分析:一项横断面研究

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-07-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S521735
Huan Chen, Xiaohui Dong, Shi Chen, Xinyu Chen, Xianying Lu, Jiali He, Wenting Ji, Chaoming Hou, Dingxi Bai, Jing Gao
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状、社会支持和糖尿病困扰的网络分析:一项横断面研究","authors":"Huan Chen, Xiaohui Dong, Shi Chen, Xinyu Chen, Xianying Lu, Jiali He, Wenting Ji, Chaoming Hou, Dingxi Bai, Jing Gao","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S521735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes distress (DD) is common in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Little is known about the complex intercorrelations between different components of depressive symptoms (DS), social support (SS), and DD. This study aimed to identify the central components of DD and to examine the interconnectedness between DS, SS, and DD components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey design was employed in this study. We investigated 886 patients with T2D from two diabetes centers. The Chinese versions of the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) were used. GGM was employed to estimate the network model. We identified central and bridge symptoms based on betweenness, closeness, and node strength centrality. The stability and accuracy of the network were examined using the case-dropping and bootstrapped procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three items (\"Do not have doctor I can see regularly\", \"Doctor does not give clear directions\", and \"Doctor does not know about diabetes\") in the network of DD exhibited the highest strength centrality. The DD-DS-SS network exhibited four strong positive bridges and two strong negative bridges. The stability and accuracy tests demonstrated that the two networks were robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physician-related distress may contribute to the development and maintenance of DD. Fatigue, diet, and social interaction summarize the complex link between DD and DS. Furthermore, subjective support and support utilization of patients with T2D were closely related to the DD. These provided more targeted theoretical guidance and a scientific basis for psychological counseling and intervention in patients with T2D.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"1951-1964"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network Analysis of Depressive Symptoms, Social Support, and Diabetes Distress Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Huan Chen, Xiaohui Dong, Shi Chen, Xinyu Chen, Xianying Lu, Jiali He, Wenting Ji, Chaoming Hou, Dingxi Bai, Jing Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S521735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes distress (DD) is common in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Little is known about the complex intercorrelations between different components of depressive symptoms (DS), social support (SS), and DD. This study aimed to identify the central components of DD and to examine the interconnectedness between DS, SS, and DD components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey design was employed in this study. We investigated 886 patients with T2D from two diabetes centers. The Chinese versions of the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) were used. GGM was employed to estimate the network model. We identified central and bridge symptoms based on betweenness, closeness, and node strength centrality. The stability and accuracy of the network were examined using the case-dropping and bootstrapped procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three items (\\\"Do not have doctor I can see regularly\\\", \\\"Doctor does not give clear directions\\\", and \\\"Doctor does not know about diabetes\\\") in the network of DD exhibited the highest strength centrality. The DD-DS-SS network exhibited four strong positive bridges and two strong negative bridges. The stability and accuracy tests demonstrated that the two networks were robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physician-related distress may contribute to the development and maintenance of DD. Fatigue, diet, and social interaction summarize the complex link between DD and DS. Furthermore, subjective support and support utilization of patients with T2D were closely related to the DD. These provided more targeted theoretical guidance and a scientific basis for psychological counseling and intervention in patients with T2D.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"1951-1964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S521735\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S521735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病窘迫(DD)在2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中很常见。关于抑郁症状(DS)、社会支持(SS)和DD的不同组成部分之间复杂的相互关系,我们所知甚少。本研究旨在确定DD的核心组成部分,并检验DS、SS和DD组成部分之间的相互联系。方法:采用横断面调查设计。我们调查了来自两个糖尿病中心的886例T2D患者。采用中文版糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)、患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)和社会支持评定量表(SSRS)。采用GGM对网络模型进行估计。我们根据中间性、紧密性和节点强度中心性来确定中枢和桥状症状。采用弃案和自举两种方法对网络的稳定性和准确性进行了检验。结果:DD网络中“没有医生我能定期看”、“医生没有给出明确的指示”和“医生不了解糖尿病”三项表现出最高的强度中心性。DD-DS-SS网络表现出4个强正桥和2个强负桥。稳定性和准确性测试表明,这两种网络具有良好的鲁棒性。结论:医生相关的焦虑可能与DD的发生和维持有关,疲劳、饮食和社会交往是DD与DS之间复杂的联系。此外,T2D患者的主观支持和支持利用与DD密切相关,为T2D患者的心理咨询和干预提供了更有针对性的理论指导和科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Network Analysis of Depressive Symptoms, Social Support, and Diabetes Distress Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Network Analysis of Depressive Symptoms, Social Support, and Diabetes Distress Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Network Analysis of Depressive Symptoms, Social Support, and Diabetes Distress Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Network Analysis of Depressive Symptoms, Social Support, and Diabetes Distress Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Diabetes distress (DD) is common in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Little is known about the complex intercorrelations between different components of depressive symptoms (DS), social support (SS), and DD. This study aimed to identify the central components of DD and to examine the interconnectedness between DS, SS, and DD components.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was employed in this study. We investigated 886 patients with T2D from two diabetes centers. The Chinese versions of the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) were used. GGM was employed to estimate the network model. We identified central and bridge symptoms based on betweenness, closeness, and node strength centrality. The stability and accuracy of the network were examined using the case-dropping and bootstrapped procedures.

Results: Three items ("Do not have doctor I can see regularly", "Doctor does not give clear directions", and "Doctor does not know about diabetes") in the network of DD exhibited the highest strength centrality. The DD-DS-SS network exhibited four strong positive bridges and two strong negative bridges. The stability and accuracy tests demonstrated that the two networks were robust.

Conclusion: Physician-related distress may contribute to the development and maintenance of DD. Fatigue, diet, and social interaction summarize the complex link between DD and DS. Furthermore, subjective support and support utilization of patients with T2D were closely related to the DD. These provided more targeted theoretical guidance and a scientific basis for psychological counseling and intervention in patients with T2D.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信