2022年莫桑比克青蒿醚-氟苯曲明、青蒿琥酯-阿莫地喹、双氢青蒿素-哌喹和青蒿琥酯-吡啶治疗无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾的疗效

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Abel Nhama, Arlindo Chidimatembue, Lídia Nhamussua, Quique Bassat, Clemente da Silva, Arsénio Nhacolo, Paulo Arnaldo, Crizolgo Salvador, Annette Cassy, Baltazar Candrinho, Mércia Dimene, Eva Carvalho, Abuchahama Saifodine, Flavio Wate, Hélio Mucavele, Yaritbel Torres-Mendoza, Breanna Horton, Mateusz Plucinski, Pau Cistero, Alfredo Mayor, Pedro Aide
{"title":"2022年莫桑比克青蒿醚-氟苯曲明、青蒿琥酯-阿莫地喹、双氢青蒿素-哌喹和青蒿琥酯-吡啶治疗无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾的疗效","authors":"Abel Nhama, Arlindo Chidimatembue, Lídia Nhamussua, Quique Bassat, Clemente da Silva, Arsénio Nhacolo, Paulo Arnaldo, Crizolgo Salvador, Annette Cassy, Baltazar Candrinho, Mércia Dimene, Eva Carvalho, Abuchahama Saifodine, Flavio Wate, Hélio Mucavele, Yaritbel Torres-Mendoza, Breanna Horton, Mateusz Plucinski, Pau Cistero, Alfredo Mayor, Pedro Aide","doi":"10.1186/s12936-025-05473-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) are the first-line treatments against malaria in Mozambique. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) has been used in-country for mass drug administration campaigns, and artesunate-pyronaridine (AS-PY) is considered an alternative drug to delay AL resistance in the country. To assess whether AL and AS-AQ remain efficacious and to confirm that DP and AS-PY are potential alternatives for uncomplicated malaria treatment, an in vivo therapeutic efficacy study was conducted in Mozambique at five sentinel sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in the districts of Montepuez (AL), Dondo (AL and AS-AQ), Mopeia (AL and AS-PY), Moatize (AL and AS-AQ), and Massinga (AL and DP) following the 2009 World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended protocol. Patients aged 6 months to 11 years with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria (1000-200,000 parasites/µl) were enrolled, followed, and assessed for 28 days (AL and AS-AQ) or 42 days (DP and AS-PY). Genotyping for msp1/msp2/poly-α markers and match counting via the WHO/Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) 3/3 algorithm were used to differentiate recrudescences from new infections. The primary outcome was polymerase chain reaction corrected efficacy for each drug.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 828 participants were enrolled in the four study arms: AL (462), AS-AQ (183), DP (91), and AS-PY (92). Among the recruited participants, 10.2% (85/828) were lost to follow-up or withdrew, and 60 had recurrent malaria infections, 55 of which were considered new infections and five recrudescences. Day 28 corrected AL efficacy was 100% (95% CI 94.3-100) in Massinga, 100% in Dondo, 100% (95% CI 95.5-100) in Moatize, 97.63% (95% CI 94.4-100) in Mopeia, and 98.68% (95% CI 96.2-100) in Montepuez. Day 28 corrected AS-AQ efficacy was 100% in Dondo and 100% (95% CI 95.4-100) in Moatize. For DP, the corrected efficacy on day 42 was 100% (95% CI 94.1-100) in Massinga, and that on day 42 was 97.75% (95% CI 94.7-100) in Mopeia. All drugs were well tolerated, with adverse events reported in less than 2% of the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AL and AS-AQ remain effective, as their efficacy remained above the 90% WHO-recommended cut-off. DP and AS-PY also showed therapeutic efficacy above the WHO-acceptable cut-off and could be used as first-line treatments when needed. All four artemisinin-based combinations were well tolerated, with minimal safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05343312.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate-amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artesunate-pyronaridine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mozambique, 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Abel Nhama, Arlindo Chidimatembue, Lídia Nhamussua, Quique Bassat, Clemente da Silva, Arsénio Nhacolo, Paulo Arnaldo, Crizolgo Salvador, Annette Cassy, Baltazar Candrinho, Mércia Dimene, Eva Carvalho, Abuchahama Saifodine, Flavio Wate, Hélio Mucavele, Yaritbel Torres-Mendoza, Breanna Horton, Mateusz Plucinski, Pau Cistero, Alfredo Mayor, Pedro Aide\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12936-025-05473-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) are the first-line treatments against malaria in Mozambique. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) has been used in-country for mass drug administration campaigns, and artesunate-pyronaridine (AS-PY) is considered an alternative drug to delay AL resistance in the country. To assess whether AL and AS-AQ remain efficacious and to confirm that DP and AS-PY are potential alternatives for uncomplicated malaria treatment, an in vivo therapeutic efficacy study was conducted in Mozambique at five sentinel sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in the districts of Montepuez (AL), Dondo (AL and AS-AQ), Mopeia (AL and AS-PY), Moatize (AL and AS-AQ), and Massinga (AL and DP) following the 2009 World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended protocol. Patients aged 6 months to 11 years with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria (1000-200,000 parasites/µl) were enrolled, followed, and assessed for 28 days (AL and AS-AQ) or 42 days (DP and AS-PY). Genotyping for msp1/msp2/poly-α markers and match counting via the WHO/Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) 3/3 algorithm were used to differentiate recrudescences from new infections. The primary outcome was polymerase chain reaction corrected efficacy for each drug.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 828 participants were enrolled in the four study arms: AL (462), AS-AQ (183), DP (91), and AS-PY (92). Among the recruited participants, 10.2% (85/828) were lost to follow-up or withdrew, and 60 had recurrent malaria infections, 55 of which were considered new infections and five recrudescences. Day 28 corrected AL efficacy was 100% (95% CI 94.3-100) in Massinga, 100% in Dondo, 100% (95% CI 95.5-100) in Moatize, 97.63% (95% CI 94.4-100) in Mopeia, and 98.68% (95% CI 96.2-100) in Montepuez. Day 28 corrected AS-AQ efficacy was 100% in Dondo and 100% (95% CI 95.4-100) in Moatize. For DP, the corrected efficacy on day 42 was 100% (95% CI 94.1-100) in Massinga, and that on day 42 was 97.75% (95% CI 94.7-100) in Mopeia. All drugs were well tolerated, with adverse events reported in less than 2% of the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AL and AS-AQ remain effective, as their efficacy remained above the 90% WHO-recommended cut-off. DP and AS-PY also showed therapeutic efficacy above the WHO-acceptable cut-off and could be used as first-line treatments when needed. All four artemisinin-based combinations were well tolerated, with minimal safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05343312.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257838/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05473-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05473-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:蒿甲醚-芴嗪(AL)和青蒿琥酯-阿莫地喹(AS-AQ)是莫桑比克治疗疟疾的一线药物。双氢青蒿素-哌喹(DP)已在国内用于大规模给药运动,青蒿琥酯-吡啶(AS-PY)被认为是该国延缓AL耐药的替代药物。为了评估AL和AS-AQ是否仍然有效,并确认DP和AS-PY是简单疟疾治疗的潜在替代方案,在莫桑比克的五个哨点进行了体内治疗疗效研究。方法:本研究遵循2009年世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的方案,在Montepuez (AL)、Dondo (AL和AS-AQ)、Mopeia (AL和AS-PY)、Moatize (AL和AS-AQ)和Massinga (AL和DP)地区进行。年龄为6个月至11岁的无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾患者(1000-200,000寄生虫/µl)被纳入研究,随访并评估28天(AL和AS-AQ)或42天(DP和AS-PY)。采用msp1/msp2/poly-α标记基因分型和WHO/Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) 3/3算法进行匹配计数来区分复发与新发感染。主要终点是聚合酶链反应校正后每种药物的疗效。结果:共有828名参与者被纳入四个研究组:AL (462), AS-AQ (183), DP(91)和AS-PY(92)。在招募的参与者中,10.2%(85/828)失去随访或退出,60人有复发性疟疾感染,其中55人被认为是新感染,5人复发。第28天校正后的AL疗效在Massinga为100% (95% CI 94.3-100), Dondo为100%,Moatize为100% (95% CI 95.5-100), Mopeia为97.63% (95% CI 94.4-100), Montepuez为98.68% (95% CI 96.2-100)。第28天校正后的AS-AQ疗效Dondo为100%,Moatize为100% (95% CI 95.4-100)。对于DP, Massinga第42天的矫正疗效为100% (95% CI 94.1-100), Mopeia第42天的矫正疗效为97.75% (95% CI 94.7-100)。所有药物均具有良好的耐受性,不良事件发生率低于2%。结论:AL和as - aq仍然有效,因为它们的疗效仍然高于世卫组织推荐的90%临界值。DP和as - py的治疗效果也高于世卫组织可接受的临界值,必要时可作为一线治疗。所有四种以青蒿素为基础的联合用药耐受性良好,安全性问题最小。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05343312。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate-amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artesunate-pyronaridine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mozambique, 2022.

Background: Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) are the first-line treatments against malaria in Mozambique. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) has been used in-country for mass drug administration campaigns, and artesunate-pyronaridine (AS-PY) is considered an alternative drug to delay AL resistance in the country. To assess whether AL and AS-AQ remain efficacious and to confirm that DP and AS-PY are potential alternatives for uncomplicated malaria treatment, an in vivo therapeutic efficacy study was conducted in Mozambique at five sentinel sites.

Methods: This study was conducted in the districts of Montepuez (AL), Dondo (AL and AS-AQ), Mopeia (AL and AS-PY), Moatize (AL and AS-AQ), and Massinga (AL and DP) following the 2009 World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended protocol. Patients aged 6 months to 11 years with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria (1000-200,000 parasites/µl) were enrolled, followed, and assessed for 28 days (AL and AS-AQ) or 42 days (DP and AS-PY). Genotyping for msp1/msp2/poly-α markers and match counting via the WHO/Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) 3/3 algorithm were used to differentiate recrudescences from new infections. The primary outcome was polymerase chain reaction corrected efficacy for each drug.

Results: In total, 828 participants were enrolled in the four study arms: AL (462), AS-AQ (183), DP (91), and AS-PY (92). Among the recruited participants, 10.2% (85/828) were lost to follow-up or withdrew, and 60 had recurrent malaria infections, 55 of which were considered new infections and five recrudescences. Day 28 corrected AL efficacy was 100% (95% CI 94.3-100) in Massinga, 100% in Dondo, 100% (95% CI 95.5-100) in Moatize, 97.63% (95% CI 94.4-100) in Mopeia, and 98.68% (95% CI 96.2-100) in Montepuez. Day 28 corrected AS-AQ efficacy was 100% in Dondo and 100% (95% CI 95.4-100) in Moatize. For DP, the corrected efficacy on day 42 was 100% (95% CI 94.1-100) in Massinga, and that on day 42 was 97.75% (95% CI 94.7-100) in Mopeia. All drugs were well tolerated, with adverse events reported in less than 2% of the participants.

Conclusion: AL and AS-AQ remain effective, as their efficacy remained above the 90% WHO-recommended cut-off. DP and AS-PY also showed therapeutic efficacy above the WHO-acceptable cut-off and could be used as first-line treatments when needed. All four artemisinin-based combinations were well tolerated, with minimal safety concerns.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05343312.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信