Ewout C van der Wal, Johannes J Duvekot, Ilse J J Dons-Sinke, Robert J Stolker, Sanne E Hoeks, Caroline D van der Marel
{"title":"硬膜外镇痛对肥胖产妇和围产儿的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Ewout C van der Wal, Johannes J Duvekot, Ilse J J Dons-Sinke, Robert J Stolker, Sanne E Hoeks, Caroline D van der Marel","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Obesity in pregnancy is associated with several risks during vaginal delivery. Several guidelines advise early epidural placement. This systematic review summarizes evidence on the maternal and perinatal outcome of epidural analgesia (EA) for vaginal delivery in obese women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting EA during vaginal delivery in obese women. Study information, baseline characteristics, and outcomes were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies (31,325 patients total) were included. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality scores ranged from 2/8 to 7/8. Studies varied in study group choice, baseline characteristics, and outcome measures. Five studies reported patient-oriented outcomes, nine reported technical outcomes regarding catheter placement. One study compared obese women with early vs. late vs. no EA and reported similar incidence of instrumental deliveries (5.3 vs. 1.8 % vs. 0 %, p=0.315) and similar Apgar scores (8.37 ± 1.17 vs. 8.43 ± 1.28 vs. 8.08 ± 2.02, p=0.519). Other studies used a comparison of obese with non-obese women, both receiving EA. Incidence of instrumental deliveries was similar, but the incidence of cesarean delivery and several other outcomes was increased in obese women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The selected literature predominantly reports on technical difficulties regarding EA. In many studies but one, we found a sub-optimal comparison of obese and non-obese women with EA. Side effects of EA in obese women are suggested in some studies, but we believe that the true influence of EA in obese parturients is insufficiently reported. To fully understand associated risks and benefits for these women, this population should be studied separately, and more evidence is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and perinatal outcomes in obese parturients with epidural analgesia: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ewout C van der Wal, Johannes J Duvekot, Ilse J J Dons-Sinke, Robert J Stolker, Sanne E Hoeks, Caroline D van der Marel\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jpm-2024-0541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Obesity in pregnancy is associated with several risks during vaginal delivery. Several guidelines advise early epidural placement. This systematic review summarizes evidence on the maternal and perinatal outcome of epidural analgesia (EA) for vaginal delivery in obese women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting EA during vaginal delivery in obese women. Study information, baseline characteristics, and outcomes were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies (31,325 patients total) were included. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality scores ranged from 2/8 to 7/8. Studies varied in study group choice, baseline characteristics, and outcome measures. Five studies reported patient-oriented outcomes, nine reported technical outcomes regarding catheter placement. One study compared obese women with early vs. late vs. no EA and reported similar incidence of instrumental deliveries (5.3 vs. 1.8 % vs. 0 %, p=0.315) and similar Apgar scores (8.37 ± 1.17 vs. 8.43 ± 1.28 vs. 8.08 ± 2.02, p=0.519). Other studies used a comparison of obese with non-obese women, both receiving EA. Incidence of instrumental deliveries was similar, but the incidence of cesarean delivery and several other outcomes was increased in obese women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The selected literature predominantly reports on technical difficulties regarding EA. In many studies but one, we found a sub-optimal comparison of obese and non-obese women with EA. Side effects of EA in obese women are suggested in some studies, but we believe that the true influence of EA in obese parturients is insufficiently reported. To fully understand associated risks and benefits for these women, this population should be studied separately, and more evidence is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:妊娠期肥胖与阴道分娩的几种风险相关。一些指南建议早期硬膜外放置。本系统综述总结了硬膜外镇痛(EA)用于肥胖妇女阴道分娩的孕产妇和围产儿结局的证据。方法:进行系统的文献检索,以确定报告肥胖妇女阴道分娩时EA的研究。提取研究信息、基线特征和结果。结果:纳入11项研究(共31325例患者)。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表的质量评分范围从2/8到7/8。研究在研究组选择、基线特征和结果测量方面有所不同。5项研究报告了以患者为导向的结果,9项研究报告了导管放置的技术结果。一项研究比较了早期、晚期和无EA的肥胖妇女,报告了相似的器械分娩发生率(5.3 vs. 1.8 % vs. 0 %,p=0.315)和相似的Apgar评分(8.37±1.17 vs. 8.43±1.28 vs. 8.08±2.02,p=0.519)。其他研究对肥胖和非肥胖妇女进行了比较,两者都接受了EA。器械分娩的发生率相似,但肥胖妇女剖宫产和其他一些结局的发生率增加。结论:所选文献主要报道了EA的技术难点。在除一项研究外的许多研究中,我们发现肥胖和非肥胖妇女EA的比较不理想。一些研究表明肥胖妇女EA的副作用,但我们认为EA对肥胖产妇的真正影响报道不足。为了充分了解这些妇女的相关风险和益处,应该对这一人群进行单独研究,并需要更多的证据。
Maternal and perinatal outcomes in obese parturients with epidural analgesia: a systematic review.
Objectives: Obesity in pregnancy is associated with several risks during vaginal delivery. Several guidelines advise early epidural placement. This systematic review summarizes evidence on the maternal and perinatal outcome of epidural analgesia (EA) for vaginal delivery in obese women.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting EA during vaginal delivery in obese women. Study information, baseline characteristics, and outcomes were extracted.
Results: Eleven studies (31,325 patients total) were included. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality scores ranged from 2/8 to 7/8. Studies varied in study group choice, baseline characteristics, and outcome measures. Five studies reported patient-oriented outcomes, nine reported technical outcomes regarding catheter placement. One study compared obese women with early vs. late vs. no EA and reported similar incidence of instrumental deliveries (5.3 vs. 1.8 % vs. 0 %, p=0.315) and similar Apgar scores (8.37 ± 1.17 vs. 8.43 ± 1.28 vs. 8.08 ± 2.02, p=0.519). Other studies used a comparison of obese with non-obese women, both receiving EA. Incidence of instrumental deliveries was similar, but the incidence of cesarean delivery and several other outcomes was increased in obese women.
Conclusions: The selected literature predominantly reports on technical difficulties regarding EA. In many studies but one, we found a sub-optimal comparison of obese and non-obese women with EA. Side effects of EA in obese women are suggested in some studies, but we believe that the true influence of EA in obese parturients is insufficiently reported. To fully understand associated risks and benefits for these women, this population should be studied separately, and more evidence is needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.