{"title":"电子烟对嗅觉的影响:与传统香烟的比较分析。","authors":"Ahmet Koder, Safiye Özdil","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use on olfactory function and compare the outcomes with traditional cigarette smokers and nonsmokers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were equally divided into 3 main groups (n=40 each): electronic cigarette users, traditional cigarette smokers, and nonsmokers. Among the e-cigarette users, 33 used liquid-based products and 7 used heated tobacco products. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks Extended Test, which measures odor threshold, discrimination, and identification scores. The combined threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) score was used to quantify overall olfactory performance. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditional smokers exhibited the lowest olfactory performance, with significantly reduced TDI, threshold, and identification scores compared with both e-cigarette users and nonsmokers (P<0.05). E-cigarette users demonstrated significantly better olfactory scores than traditional smokers but poorer performance than nonsmokers, although the difference between e-cigarette users and nonsmokers was not statistically significant (P=0.100). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of odor discrimination scores. E-cigarette use was associated with less severe olfactory impairment than traditional smoking, but still showed a trend toward reduced function compared with nonsmokers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while e-cigarettes may be less detrimental to olfaction than traditional cigarettes, they are not without risk. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on the olfactory system.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Sense of Smell: A Comparative Analysis With Traditional Cigarettes.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Koder, Safiye Özdil\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use on olfactory function and compare the outcomes with traditional cigarette smokers and nonsmokers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were equally divided into 3 main groups (n=40 each): electronic cigarette users, traditional cigarette smokers, and nonsmokers. Among the e-cigarette users, 33 used liquid-based products and 7 used heated tobacco products. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks Extended Test, which measures odor threshold, discrimination, and identification scores. The combined threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) score was used to quantify overall olfactory performance. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditional smokers exhibited the lowest olfactory performance, with significantly reduced TDI, threshold, and identification scores compared with both e-cigarette users and nonsmokers (P<0.05). E-cigarette users demonstrated significantly better olfactory scores than traditional smokers but poorer performance than nonsmokers, although the difference between e-cigarette users and nonsmokers was not statistically significant (P=0.100). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of odor discrimination scores. E-cigarette use was associated with less severe olfactory impairment than traditional smoking, but still showed a trend toward reduced function compared with nonsmokers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while e-cigarettes may be less detrimental to olfaction than traditional cigarettes, they are not without risk. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on the olfactory system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011665\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Sense of Smell: A Comparative Analysis With Traditional Cigarettes.
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use on olfactory function and compare the outcomes with traditional cigarette smokers and nonsmokers.
Methods: Participants were equally divided into 3 main groups (n=40 each): electronic cigarette users, traditional cigarette smokers, and nonsmokers. Among the e-cigarette users, 33 used liquid-based products and 7 used heated tobacco products. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks Extended Test, which measures odor threshold, discrimination, and identification scores. The combined threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) score was used to quantify overall olfactory performance. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests.
Results: Traditional smokers exhibited the lowest olfactory performance, with significantly reduced TDI, threshold, and identification scores compared with both e-cigarette users and nonsmokers (P<0.05). E-cigarette users demonstrated significantly better olfactory scores than traditional smokers but poorer performance than nonsmokers, although the difference between e-cigarette users and nonsmokers was not statistically significant (P=0.100). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of odor discrimination scores. E-cigarette use was associated with less severe olfactory impairment than traditional smoking, but still showed a trend toward reduced function compared with nonsmokers.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that while e-cigarettes may be less detrimental to olfaction than traditional cigarettes, they are not without risk. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on the olfactory system.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.