23号玻璃体切除术后段iofb的角膜缘与平面部摘除:解剖和视力结果,以及术后视网膜脱离和视力预后不良的预测因素。

IF 2.4 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Abbas A A Hashem, Ahmad S Khalil, Sherif A Dabour, Wael M El-Haig
{"title":"23号玻璃体切除术后段iofb的角膜缘与平面部摘除:解剖和视力结果,以及术后视网膜脱离和视力预后不良的预测因素。","authors":"Abbas A A Hashem, Ahmad S Khalil, Sherif A Dabour, Wael M El-Haig","doi":"10.1186/s40942-025-00701-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retained posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) present a surgical challenge with potential for serious complications, including retinal detachment (RD) and vision loss. While pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is the standard technique, there is no consensus regarding the optimal route for IOFB extraction, whether through a limbal incision or via the pars plana. This study aims to compare anatomical and visual outcomes between the two surgical approaches and to identify risk factors for postoperative RD and poor visual outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective comparative study included 51 eyes with retained posterior segment IOFBs and an attached retina at presentation. Patients were randomly assigned to IOFB extraction via either a limbal incision (n = 26) or a pars plana incision (n = 25), following 23-gauge PPV. All patients were followed for a median of 12 months. Primary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative RD recorded over the entire first postoperative year and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at one year. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of RD and poor visual outcome, defined as BCVA worse than 0.8 logMAR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative RD developed in 8 eyes (15.7%): 2 eyes (7.7%) in the limbal group and 6 eyes (24%) in the pars plana group (P = 0.14). Impacted IOFB (P = 0.042) and longer foreign body diameter (P = 0.032) were independent predictors of RD. Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA from baseline (P < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups at any follow-up point. Poor visual outcome was independently associated with longer wound length (P = 0.011) and preoperative VA ≤ 1.6 logMAR (P = 0.005). The route of extraction was not a significant predictor of anatomical or functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IOFB extraction via the limbus or pars plana using 23-gauge PPV provides comparable anatomical and visual outcomes. Impacted IOFBs and larger foreign bodies increase the risk of postoperative RD, while wound length and poor baseline visual acuity are strong predictors of poor final visual outcome. Early recognition of these predictors is important for optimizing surgical planning and patient counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":"11 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limbal versus Pars plana extraction of posterior segment IOFBs using 23-gauge vitrectomy: anatomical and visual outcomes, and predictive factors for postoperative retinal detachment and poor visual prognosis.\",\"authors\":\"Abbas A A Hashem, Ahmad S Khalil, Sherif A Dabour, Wael M El-Haig\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40942-025-00701-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retained posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) present a surgical challenge with potential for serious complications, including retinal detachment (RD) and vision loss. While pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is the standard technique, there is no consensus regarding the optimal route for IOFB extraction, whether through a limbal incision or via the pars plana. This study aims to compare anatomical and visual outcomes between the two surgical approaches and to identify risk factors for postoperative RD and poor visual outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective comparative study included 51 eyes with retained posterior segment IOFBs and an attached retina at presentation. Patients were randomly assigned to IOFB extraction via either a limbal incision (n = 26) or a pars plana incision (n = 25), following 23-gauge PPV. All patients were followed for a median of 12 months. Primary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative RD recorded over the entire first postoperative year and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at one year. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of RD and poor visual outcome, defined as BCVA worse than 0.8 logMAR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative RD developed in 8 eyes (15.7%): 2 eyes (7.7%) in the limbal group and 6 eyes (24%) in the pars plana group (P = 0.14). Impacted IOFB (P = 0.042) and longer foreign body diameter (P = 0.032) were independent predictors of RD. Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA from baseline (P < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups at any follow-up point. Poor visual outcome was independently associated with longer wound length (P = 0.011) and preoperative VA ≤ 1.6 logMAR (P = 0.005). The route of extraction was not a significant predictor of anatomical or functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IOFB extraction via the limbus or pars plana using 23-gauge PPV provides comparable anatomical and visual outcomes. Impacted IOFBs and larger foreign bodies increase the risk of postoperative RD, while wound length and poor baseline visual acuity are strong predictors of poor final visual outcome. Early recognition of these predictors is important for optimizing surgical planning and patient counseling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-025-00701-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-025-00701-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:后段眼内异物(IOFBs)是一种具有潜在严重并发症的手术挑战,包括视网膜脱离(RD)和视力丧失。虽然玻璃体切割(PPV)是标准技术,但对于IOFB的最佳提取途径,是通过角膜缘切口还是通过玻璃体切割,目前还没有达成共识。本研究旨在比较两种手术方式的解剖和视力结果,并确定术后RD和视力不良的危险因素。方法:这项前瞻性比较研究包括51只眼的后段iofb保留和视网膜附着。患者被随机分配通过缘切口(n = 26)或平面部切口(n = 25),在23号PPV后进行IOFB取出。所有患者的随访时间中位数为12个月。主要结果包括术后第一年记录的术后RD发生率和一年内的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,以确定RD和视力不良的预测因素,定义为BCVA小于0.8 logMAR。结果:术后发生RD 8眼(15.7%):角膜缘组2眼(7.7%),翼状部组6眼(24%)(P = 0.14)。影响IOFB (P = 0.042)和较长的异物直径(P = 0.032)是RD的独立预测因素。两组均显示BCVA较基线有显著改善(P结论:使用23号PPV通过边缘或平面部提取IOFB提供了相当的解剖和视觉结果。受影响的iofb和较大的异物增加了术后RD的风险,而伤口长度和基线视力差是最终视力差的有力预测因素。早期识别这些预测因素对于优化手术计划和患者咨询非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Limbal versus Pars plana extraction of posterior segment IOFBs using 23-gauge vitrectomy: anatomical and visual outcomes, and predictive factors for postoperative retinal detachment and poor visual prognosis.

Limbal versus Pars plana extraction of posterior segment IOFBs using 23-gauge vitrectomy: anatomical and visual outcomes, and predictive factors for postoperative retinal detachment and poor visual prognosis.

Background: Retained posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) present a surgical challenge with potential for serious complications, including retinal detachment (RD) and vision loss. While pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is the standard technique, there is no consensus regarding the optimal route for IOFB extraction, whether through a limbal incision or via the pars plana. This study aims to compare anatomical and visual outcomes between the two surgical approaches and to identify risk factors for postoperative RD and poor visual outcome.

Methods: This prospective comparative study included 51 eyes with retained posterior segment IOFBs and an attached retina at presentation. Patients were randomly assigned to IOFB extraction via either a limbal incision (n = 26) or a pars plana incision (n = 25), following 23-gauge PPV. All patients were followed for a median of 12 months. Primary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative RD recorded over the entire first postoperative year and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at one year. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of RD and poor visual outcome, defined as BCVA worse than 0.8 logMAR.

Results: Postoperative RD developed in 8 eyes (15.7%): 2 eyes (7.7%) in the limbal group and 6 eyes (24%) in the pars plana group (P = 0.14). Impacted IOFB (P = 0.042) and longer foreign body diameter (P = 0.032) were independent predictors of RD. Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA from baseline (P < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups at any follow-up point. Poor visual outcome was independently associated with longer wound length (P = 0.011) and preoperative VA ≤ 1.6 logMAR (P = 0.005). The route of extraction was not a significant predictor of anatomical or functional outcome.

Conclusions: IOFB extraction via the limbus or pars plana using 23-gauge PPV provides comparable anatomical and visual outcomes. Impacted IOFBs and larger foreign bodies increase the risk of postoperative RD, while wound length and poor baseline visual acuity are strong predictors of poor final visual outcome. Early recognition of these predictors is important for optimizing surgical planning and patient counseling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信