用一种新的选择装置获得的精子功能参数。

IF 2.8 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Julio C Chávez, Paulina Torres, Gabriela Carrasquel-Martínez, María G Figueroa-Méndez, Diana Flores, Lina Villar, Israel Maldonado, Marcela B Trevino, Claudia Treviño
{"title":"用一种新的选择装置获得的精子功能参数。","authors":"Julio C Chávez, Paulina Torres, Gabriela Carrasquel-Martínez, María G Figueroa-Méndez, Diana Flores, Lina Villar, Israel Maldonado, Marcela B Trevino, Claudia Treviño","doi":"10.1002/2211-5463.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The success of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) is based on the selection of gametes with optimal characteristics. This is critical for male gametes, since among the large number of cells present in semen, many may have unnoticeable DNA damage and compromised membrane integrity, among other alterations. In this work, we examined the use of the LensHooke CA0™ device (CA0 chamber) as a promising sperm separation method for ARTs, analyzing both normozoospermic and teratozoospermic samples. Additionally, we compared fertilization rates with IVF and ICSI procedures using Teratozoospermic samples. As reference for comparison, we used the current standard for sperm selection, density gradient centrifugation. Using CA0 chambers and DGC, we obtained comparable sperm recovery numbers, membrane potential (in Normozoospermic samples) and motility parameters. The progesterone-induced intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> increase was only slightly greater in sperm selected with DGC compared to CA0 chambers. Finally, no differences were observed in IVF and ICSI fertilization rates between Tz sperm separated with DGC and CA0 chambers. Overall, we conclude that the quantity and quality of sperm selected with CA0 chambers is comparable to that obtained with DGC, without compromising reproducibility. Importantly, CA0 chambers offer key practical and methodological advantages, resulting in a faster, simpler and more affordable sperm selection method.</p>","PeriodicalId":12187,"journal":{"name":"FEBS Open Bio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional parameters of spermatozoa obtained by a new selection device.\",\"authors\":\"Julio C Chávez, Paulina Torres, Gabriela Carrasquel-Martínez, María G Figueroa-Méndez, Diana Flores, Lina Villar, Israel Maldonado, Marcela B Trevino, Claudia Treviño\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2211-5463.70073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The success of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) is based on the selection of gametes with optimal characteristics. This is critical for male gametes, since among the large number of cells present in semen, many may have unnoticeable DNA damage and compromised membrane integrity, among other alterations. In this work, we examined the use of the LensHooke CA0™ device (CA0 chamber) as a promising sperm separation method for ARTs, analyzing both normozoospermic and teratozoospermic samples. Additionally, we compared fertilization rates with IVF and ICSI procedures using Teratozoospermic samples. As reference for comparison, we used the current standard for sperm selection, density gradient centrifugation. Using CA0 chambers and DGC, we obtained comparable sperm recovery numbers, membrane potential (in Normozoospermic samples) and motility parameters. The progesterone-induced intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> increase was only slightly greater in sperm selected with DGC compared to CA0 chambers. Finally, no differences were observed in IVF and ICSI fertilization rates between Tz sperm separated with DGC and CA0 chambers. Overall, we conclude that the quantity and quality of sperm selected with CA0 chambers is comparable to that obtained with DGC, without compromising reproducibility. Importantly, CA0 chambers offer key practical and methodological advantages, resulting in a faster, simpler and more affordable sperm selection method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEBS Open Bio\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEBS Open Bio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.70073\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEBS Open Bio","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.70073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辅助生殖技术(ARTs)的成功是基于选择具有最佳特征的配子。这对雄性配子至关重要,因为在精液中存在的大量细胞中,许多细胞可能有不明显的DNA损伤和膜完整性受损,以及其他变化。在这项工作中,我们研究了LensHooke CA0™装置(CA0室)作为一种有前途的精子分离方法用于art,分析了正常精子和畸形精子样本。此外,我们比较了使用畸形精子样本的IVF和ICSI程序的受精率。作为对照,我们采用现行精子选择标准,密度梯度离心。使用CA0腔室和DGC,我们获得了可比较的精子恢复数、膜电位(在normmozoo精子样品中)和运动参数。孕酮诱导的细胞内Ca2+增加在选择DGC的精子中仅略大于CA0腔。最后,DGC和CA0腔室分离的Tz精子的IVF和ICSI受精率没有差异。总的来说,我们得出的结论是,用CA0腔室选择的精子的数量和质量与用DGC获得的精子相当,而不影响再现性。重要的是,CA0室提供了关键的实用和方法优势,从而产生了更快、更简单和更实惠的精子选择方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional parameters of spermatozoa obtained by a new selection device.

The success of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) is based on the selection of gametes with optimal characteristics. This is critical for male gametes, since among the large number of cells present in semen, many may have unnoticeable DNA damage and compromised membrane integrity, among other alterations. In this work, we examined the use of the LensHooke CA0™ device (CA0 chamber) as a promising sperm separation method for ARTs, analyzing both normozoospermic and teratozoospermic samples. Additionally, we compared fertilization rates with IVF and ICSI procedures using Teratozoospermic samples. As reference for comparison, we used the current standard for sperm selection, density gradient centrifugation. Using CA0 chambers and DGC, we obtained comparable sperm recovery numbers, membrane potential (in Normozoospermic samples) and motility parameters. The progesterone-induced intracellular Ca2+ increase was only slightly greater in sperm selected with DGC compared to CA0 chambers. Finally, no differences were observed in IVF and ICSI fertilization rates between Tz sperm separated with DGC and CA0 chambers. Overall, we conclude that the quantity and quality of sperm selected with CA0 chambers is comparable to that obtained with DGC, without compromising reproducibility. Importantly, CA0 chambers offer key practical and methodological advantages, resulting in a faster, simpler and more affordable sperm selection method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FEBS Open Bio
FEBS Open Bio BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
173
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: FEBS Open Bio is an online-only open access journal for the rapid publication of research articles in molecular and cellular life sciences in both health and disease. The journal''s peer review process focuses on the technical soundness of papers, leaving the assessment of their impact and importance to the scientific community. FEBS Open Bio is owned by the Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS), a not-for-profit organization, and is published on behalf of FEBS by FEBS Press and Wiley. Any income from the journal will be used to support scientists through fellowships, courses, travel grants, prizes and other FEBS initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信