化疗过敏反应后的治疗选择:皮肤试验的价值。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Auriane Blanchet, Julien Robert, Catherine Devys, Morgane Collet, Jeremy Sorrieul
{"title":"化疗过敏反应后的治疗选择:皮肤试验的价值。","authors":"Auriane Blanchet, Julien Robert, Catherine Devys, Morgane Collet, Jeremy Sorrieul","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to chemotherapy agents constitute a real challenge for cancer treatment. Skin tests (STs) can help risk-stratify patients after initial HSRs and identify cross-reactions between chemotherapeutic agents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the value of STs in an integrative cancer centre to address the treatment of patients with suspicion of HSRs to platinum salts (carboplatin, oxaliplatin, cisplatin), and taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study was conducted on data collected from hospital medical records between August 2018 and December 2023. STs (prick tests and intradermal tests) were performed according to the recommendations of the European Network for Drug Allergy and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. The concordance between the allergist's recommendations and the therapeutic strategies implemented in clinical practice following ST results was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 105 patients included (76 females, 29 males), the positive ST rate was 61%. In total, 71% of the reactions to platinum salts (n=82) were identified as allergies versus 26% for taxane reactions (n=23). We found a cross-reactivity of 34.5% for platinum salts and 66.7% for taxanes. The allergist's recommendations were carried out in practice for a total of 56 patients (53%). For 47 patients (45%), a clinical reason justified not following the allergist's recommendations and discontinuing treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms the relevance of STs to help oncologists guide treatment strategies after a presumed allergy. As part of the allergological work-up, STs help prevent unnecessary changes to chemotherapy lines in patients with unproven allergies and facilitate the identification of alternative treatments following HSRs. In practice in our centre, allergists' propositions are carried out as much as possible to guide the re-exposure strategy in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic options carried out after hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: the value of skin tests.\",\"authors\":\"Auriane Blanchet, Julien Robert, Catherine Devys, Morgane Collet, Jeremy Sorrieul\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to chemotherapy agents constitute a real challenge for cancer treatment. Skin tests (STs) can help risk-stratify patients after initial HSRs and identify cross-reactions between chemotherapeutic agents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the value of STs in an integrative cancer centre to address the treatment of patients with suspicion of HSRs to platinum salts (carboplatin, oxaliplatin, cisplatin), and taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study was conducted on data collected from hospital medical records between August 2018 and December 2023. STs (prick tests and intradermal tests) were performed according to the recommendations of the European Network for Drug Allergy and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. The concordance between the allergist's recommendations and the therapeutic strategies implemented in clinical practice following ST results was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 105 patients included (76 females, 29 males), the positive ST rate was 61%. In total, 71% of the reactions to platinum salts (n=82) were identified as allergies versus 26% for taxane reactions (n=23). We found a cross-reactivity of 34.5% for platinum salts and 66.7% for taxanes. The allergist's recommendations were carried out in practice for a total of 56 patients (53%). For 47 patients (45%), a clinical reason justified not following the allergist's recommendations and discontinuing treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms the relevance of STs to help oncologists guide treatment strategies after a presumed allergy. As part of the allergological work-up, STs help prevent unnecessary changes to chemotherapy lines in patients with unproven allergies and facilitate the identification of alternative treatments following HSRs. In practice in our centre, allergists' propositions are carried out as much as possible to guide the re-exposure strategy in patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004387\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对化疗药物的超敏反应(HSRs)构成了癌症治疗的真正挑战。皮肤试验(STs)可以帮助患者在初次HSRs后进行风险分层,并确定化疗药物之间的交叉反应。目的:本研究旨在评估STs在综合癌症中心的价值,以解决铂盐(卡铂、奥沙利铂、顺铂)和紫杉醇(紫杉醇、多西紫杉醇)引起的hsr疑似患者的治疗。方法:对2018年8月至2023年12月期间收集的医院病历数据进行单中心回顾性研究。STs(点刺试验和皮内试验)是根据欧洲药物过敏网络和欧洲过敏和临床免疫学学会的建议进行的。评估过敏专科医生的建议与ST结果后临床实践中实施的治疗策略之间的一致性。结果:本组105例患者(女76例,男29例),ST阳性率为61%。总的来说,71%的铂盐反应(n=82)被确定为过敏,而26%的紫杉烷反应(n=23)被确定为过敏。铂盐的交叉反应活性为34.5%,紫杉烷的交叉反应活性为66.7%。过敏症专科医生的建议在实践中被执行了56例患者(53%)。对于47名患者(45%),临床原因证明不遵循过敏专科医生的建议并停止治疗是合理的。结论:本研究证实了STs的相关性,可以帮助肿瘤学家在推定过敏后指导治疗策略。作为过敏检查的一部分,STs有助于防止未经证实的过敏患者对化疗方案进行不必要的改变,并有助于确定HSRs后的替代治疗方法。在我们中心的实践中,尽可能多地执行过敏症专家的建议,以指导患者护理中的再暴露策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic options carried out after hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: the value of skin tests.

Introduction: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to chemotherapy agents constitute a real challenge for cancer treatment. Skin tests (STs) can help risk-stratify patients after initial HSRs and identify cross-reactions between chemotherapeutic agents.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the value of STs in an integrative cancer centre to address the treatment of patients with suspicion of HSRs to platinum salts (carboplatin, oxaliplatin, cisplatin), and taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel).

Methods: This single-centre, retrospective study was conducted on data collected from hospital medical records between August 2018 and December 2023. STs (prick tests and intradermal tests) were performed according to the recommendations of the European Network for Drug Allergy and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. The concordance between the allergist's recommendations and the therapeutic strategies implemented in clinical practice following ST results was evaluated.

Results: Among the 105 patients included (76 females, 29 males), the positive ST rate was 61%. In total, 71% of the reactions to platinum salts (n=82) were identified as allergies versus 26% for taxane reactions (n=23). We found a cross-reactivity of 34.5% for platinum salts and 66.7% for taxanes. The allergist's recommendations were carried out in practice for a total of 56 patients (53%). For 47 patients (45%), a clinical reason justified not following the allergist's recommendations and discontinuing treatment.

Conclusion: This study confirms the relevance of STs to help oncologists guide treatment strategies after a presumed allergy. As part of the allergological work-up, STs help prevent unnecessary changes to chemotherapy lines in patients with unproven allergies and facilitate the identification of alternative treatments following HSRs. In practice in our centre, allergists' propositions are carried out as much as possible to guide the re-exposure strategy in patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信