共同发生的压力损伤模式:使用真实世界临床记录的数据驱动研究。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Veysel Karani Baris, Wenyu Song, Min-Jeoung Kang, Luwei Liu, Graham Lowenthal, Luciana Schleder Goncalves, Tanya Martel, Sandy Cho, Diane L Carroll, Debra Furlong, Wadia Gilles-Fowler, Lisa Herlihy, Beth Melanson, Jacqueline Massaro, Lori D Morrow, Paula Wolski, Patricia C Dykes
{"title":"共同发生的压力损伤模式:使用真实世界临床记录的数据驱动研究。","authors":"Veysel Karani Baris, Wenyu Song, Min-Jeoung Kang, Luwei Liu, Graham Lowenthal, Luciana Schleder Goncalves, Tanya Martel, Sandy Cho, Diane L Carroll, Debra Furlong, Wadia Gilles-Fowler, Lisa Herlihy, Beth Melanson, Jacqueline Massaro, Lori D Morrow, Paula Wolski, Patricia C Dykes","doi":"10.1089/wound.2025.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to investigate patterns and risk factors associated with co-occurring pressure injuries (PrIs) using real-world clinical data. <b>Approach:</b> This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records (EHRs) of adult patients with PrIs from 2015 to 2023 across five hospitals within a large U.S. health care system. An EHR-based phenotype-a set of algorithmic rules using structured clinical data-was developed and validated to identify patients with co-occurring PrIs, enabling classification of all patients in the study cohort into either single-occurring or co-occurring PrI groups. The accuracy of the co-occurring PrI phenotype was assessed through chart review. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression were employed to identify risk factors associated with co-occurring PrIs. All findings are reported in accordance with the STROBE checklist. <b>Results:</b> Among 18,195 patients with at least one PrI record, 4,415 (24.3%) had co-occurring PrIs. The phenotype demonstrated high accuracy (accuracy = 0.96). Pattern analysis showed a direct association between the number of PrIs and severe-stage injuries. Logistic regression revealed that severe PrIs (odds ratio [OR] 3.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.23-3.74) were most strongly associated with co-occurring PrIs, followed by Black or African American race (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.14-1.84) and spinal cord injury (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.14-1.52). <b>Innovation:</b> This study introduces a validated EHR-based phenotype for identifying co-occurring PrIs. It reveals a direct link between co-occurring PrIs and injury severity, as well as unique risk factors associated with co-occurring PrIs. <b>Conclusions:</b> Co-occurring PrIs are prevalent and strongly associated with severe PrIs. This study also revealed distinct occurrence patterns, with injury severity increasing as the number of co-occurring PrIs rises. The findings from this study emphasize the need for targeted risk assessment and prevention efforts for co-occurring PrIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Co-Occurring Pressure Injuries: A Data-Driven Study Using Real-World Clinical Records.\",\"authors\":\"Veysel Karani Baris, Wenyu Song, Min-Jeoung Kang, Luwei Liu, Graham Lowenthal, Luciana Schleder Goncalves, Tanya Martel, Sandy Cho, Diane L Carroll, Debra Furlong, Wadia Gilles-Fowler, Lisa Herlihy, Beth Melanson, Jacqueline Massaro, Lori D Morrow, Paula Wolski, Patricia C Dykes\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/wound.2025.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to investigate patterns and risk factors associated with co-occurring pressure injuries (PrIs) using real-world clinical data. <b>Approach:</b> This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records (EHRs) of adult patients with PrIs from 2015 to 2023 across five hospitals within a large U.S. health care system. An EHR-based phenotype-a set of algorithmic rules using structured clinical data-was developed and validated to identify patients with co-occurring PrIs, enabling classification of all patients in the study cohort into either single-occurring or co-occurring PrI groups. The accuracy of the co-occurring PrI phenotype was assessed through chart review. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression were employed to identify risk factors associated with co-occurring PrIs. All findings are reported in accordance with the STROBE checklist. <b>Results:</b> Among 18,195 patients with at least one PrI record, 4,415 (24.3%) had co-occurring PrIs. The phenotype demonstrated high accuracy (accuracy = 0.96). Pattern analysis showed a direct association between the number of PrIs and severe-stage injuries. Logistic regression revealed that severe PrIs (odds ratio [OR] 3.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.23-3.74) were most strongly associated with co-occurring PrIs, followed by Black or African American race (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.14-1.84) and spinal cord injury (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.14-1.52). <b>Innovation:</b> This study introduces a validated EHR-based phenotype for identifying co-occurring PrIs. It reveals a direct link between co-occurring PrIs and injury severity, as well as unique risk factors associated with co-occurring PrIs. <b>Conclusions:</b> Co-occurring PrIs are prevalent and strongly associated with severe PrIs. This study also revealed distinct occurrence patterns, with injury severity increasing as the number of co-occurring PrIs rises. The findings from this study emphasize the need for targeted risk assessment and prevention efforts for co-occurring PrIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2025.0019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2025.0019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在利用真实世界的临床数据,探讨与并发压力损伤(PrIs)相关的模式和危险因素。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了美国大型医疗保健系统内五家医院2015年至2023年PrIs成年患者的电子健康记录(EHRs)。基于ehr的表型-一套使用结构化临床数据的算法规则-被开发并验证,以识别并发PrI的患者,从而将研究队列中的所有患者分类为单发或并发PrI组。通过图表复习评估共发生PrI表型的准确性。采用单因素分析和二元逻辑回归来确定与合并PrIs相关的危险因素。所有的发现都要按照STROBE检查表进行报告。结果:在18195例至少有一次PrI记录的患者中,4415例(24.3%)同时发生PrI。表型具有较高的准确度(准确度= 0.96)。模式分析显示PrIs数量与严重阶段损伤之间存在直接关联。Logistic回归结果显示,重度PrIs(比值比[OR] 3.47;95%可信区间[CI]: 3.23-3.74)与同时发生的PrIs相关性最强,其次是黑人或非裔美国人种族(or: 1.45;95% CI: 1.14-1.84)和脊髓损伤(OR: 1.32;95% ci: 1.14-1.52)。创新:本研究引入了一种有效的基于ehr的表型,用于识别共同发生的pri。它揭示了共同发生的PrIs与损伤严重程度之间的直接联系,以及与共同发生的PrIs相关的独特风险因素。结论:合并PrIs普遍存在,且与严重PrIs密切相关。该研究还揭示了不同的发生模式,损伤严重程度随着同时发生的PrIs数量的增加而增加。这项研究的结果强调了有针对性的风险评估和预防措施的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of Co-Occurring Pressure Injuries: A Data-Driven Study Using Real-World Clinical Records.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate patterns and risk factors associated with co-occurring pressure injuries (PrIs) using real-world clinical data. Approach: This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records (EHRs) of adult patients with PrIs from 2015 to 2023 across five hospitals within a large U.S. health care system. An EHR-based phenotype-a set of algorithmic rules using structured clinical data-was developed and validated to identify patients with co-occurring PrIs, enabling classification of all patients in the study cohort into either single-occurring or co-occurring PrI groups. The accuracy of the co-occurring PrI phenotype was assessed through chart review. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression were employed to identify risk factors associated with co-occurring PrIs. All findings are reported in accordance with the STROBE checklist. Results: Among 18,195 patients with at least one PrI record, 4,415 (24.3%) had co-occurring PrIs. The phenotype demonstrated high accuracy (accuracy = 0.96). Pattern analysis showed a direct association between the number of PrIs and severe-stage injuries. Logistic regression revealed that severe PrIs (odds ratio [OR] 3.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.23-3.74) were most strongly associated with co-occurring PrIs, followed by Black or African American race (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.14-1.84) and spinal cord injury (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.14-1.52). Innovation: This study introduces a validated EHR-based phenotype for identifying co-occurring PrIs. It reveals a direct link between co-occurring PrIs and injury severity, as well as unique risk factors associated with co-occurring PrIs. Conclusions: Co-occurring PrIs are prevalent and strongly associated with severe PrIs. This study also revealed distinct occurrence patterns, with injury severity increasing as the number of co-occurring PrIs rises. The findings from this study emphasize the need for targeted risk assessment and prevention efforts for co-occurring PrIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信