直肠癌肠系膜淋巴结MRI和CT淋巴结报告和数据系统1.0 (Node- rads)的读间可靠性

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1177/02841851251322887
Marco Parillo, Federica Vaccarino, Daniele Vertulli, Laura Cea, Carlo Augusto Mallio, Bruno Beomonte Zobel, Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi
{"title":"直肠癌肠系膜淋巴结MRI和CT淋巴结报告和数据系统1.0 (Node- rads)的读间可靠性","authors":"Marco Parillo, Federica Vaccarino, Daniele Vertulli, Laura Cea, Carlo Augusto Mallio, Bruno Beomonte Zobel, Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi","doi":"10.1177/02841851251322887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNode Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) classifies the risk of cancer metastases in lymph nodes at any anatomical site, using computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This new RADS needs clinical validation through agreement studies.PurposeTo evaluate the inter-reader reliability of Node-RADS between radiologists with different levels of experience, focusing on rectal cancer CT and MRI.Material and MethodsWe designed a single-center observational retrospective study to identify staging CT or MRI of newly diagnosed individuals with rectal cancer. Four readers (two residents in radiology and two radiologists) scored each mesorectal node with Node-RADS on a per-lymph node basis. Fleiss' κ was calculated to assess the level of agreement both for the score and for each individual category of the Node-RADS. A subgroup analysis was performed on a per-patient basis to evaluate the correlation between the Node-RADS assigned by the most experienced reader and the histopathological diagnosis of node involvement.ResultsA total of 20 patients were included in the study<i>.</i> The number of Node-RADS scored per reader was 242, corresponding to 968 values to be compared for agreement assessment. Fleiss' κ for Node-RADS score among all readers was 0.65 (substantial agreement). Analysis of the individual categories of the Node-RADS demonstrated a good agreement between all readers (κ > 0.61). A moderate positive correlation was documented between the Node-RADS and the likelihood of nodes being metastatic on histology.ConclusionThe Node-RADS score exhibited good inter-reader reliability between experienced radiologists and those still in training.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":"66 7","pages":"687-694"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-reader reliability of MRI and CT Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) for mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Parillo, Federica Vaccarino, Daniele Vertulli, Laura Cea, Carlo Augusto Mallio, Bruno Beomonte Zobel, Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851251322887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundNode Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) classifies the risk of cancer metastases in lymph nodes at any anatomical site, using computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This new RADS needs clinical validation through agreement studies.PurposeTo evaluate the inter-reader reliability of Node-RADS between radiologists with different levels of experience, focusing on rectal cancer CT and MRI.Material and MethodsWe designed a single-center observational retrospective study to identify staging CT or MRI of newly diagnosed individuals with rectal cancer. Four readers (two residents in radiology and two radiologists) scored each mesorectal node with Node-RADS on a per-lymph node basis. Fleiss' κ was calculated to assess the level of agreement both for the score and for each individual category of the Node-RADS. A subgroup analysis was performed on a per-patient basis to evaluate the correlation between the Node-RADS assigned by the most experienced reader and the histopathological diagnosis of node involvement.ResultsA total of 20 patients were included in the study<i>.</i> The number of Node-RADS scored per reader was 242, corresponding to 968 values to be compared for agreement assessment. Fleiss' κ for Node-RADS score among all readers was 0.65 (substantial agreement). Analysis of the individual categories of the Node-RADS demonstrated a good agreement between all readers (κ > 0.61). A moderate positive correlation was documented between the Node-RADS and the likelihood of nodes being metastatic on histology.ConclusionThe Node-RADS score exhibited good inter-reader reliability between experienced radiologists and those still in training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\"66 7\",\"pages\":\"687-694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251322887\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251322887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

节点报告和数据系统1.0 (Node-RADS)使用计算机断层扫描(CT)和/或磁共振成像(MRI)对任何解剖部位淋巴结的癌症转移风险进行分类。这种新的RADS需要通过协议研究进行临床验证。目的以直肠癌CT和MRI为研究对象,评价不同经验水平放射科医师之间Node-RADS的读者间可靠性。材料和方法我们设计了一项单中心观察性回顾性研究,以确定新诊断的直肠癌患者的CT或MRI分期。四名读者(两名放射科住院医师和两名放射科医师)以每个淋巴结为基础,用node - rads对每个肠系膜淋巴结进行评分。计算Fleiss' k来评估Node-RADS评分和每个单独类别的一致性水平。对每位患者进行亚组分析,以评估最有经验的读者分配的淋巴结rads与淋巴结受累的组织病理学诊断之间的相关性。结果共纳入20例患者。每个读者的Node-RADS得分为242,对应于968个用于一致性评估的比较值。所有读者的Node-RADS评分的Fleiss' κ为0.65(基本一致)。对Node-RADS的个体分类分析表明,所有读者之间的一致性很好(κ > 0.61)。在淋巴结- rads和淋巴结在组织学上转移的可能性之间存在中度正相关。结论Node-RADS评分在经验丰富的放射科医师和仍在培训中的放射科医师之间具有良好的读者间信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inter-reader reliability of MRI and CT Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) for mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer.

BackgroundNode Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) classifies the risk of cancer metastases in lymph nodes at any anatomical site, using computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This new RADS needs clinical validation through agreement studies.PurposeTo evaluate the inter-reader reliability of Node-RADS between radiologists with different levels of experience, focusing on rectal cancer CT and MRI.Material and MethodsWe designed a single-center observational retrospective study to identify staging CT or MRI of newly diagnosed individuals with rectal cancer. Four readers (two residents in radiology and two radiologists) scored each mesorectal node with Node-RADS on a per-lymph node basis. Fleiss' κ was calculated to assess the level of agreement both for the score and for each individual category of the Node-RADS. A subgroup analysis was performed on a per-patient basis to evaluate the correlation between the Node-RADS assigned by the most experienced reader and the histopathological diagnosis of node involvement.ResultsA total of 20 patients were included in the study. The number of Node-RADS scored per reader was 242, corresponding to 968 values to be compared for agreement assessment. Fleiss' κ for Node-RADS score among all readers was 0.65 (substantial agreement). Analysis of the individual categories of the Node-RADS demonstrated a good agreement between all readers (κ > 0.61). A moderate positive correlation was documented between the Node-RADS and the likelihood of nodes being metastatic on histology.ConclusionThe Node-RADS score exhibited good inter-reader reliability between experienced radiologists and those still in training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信