具有人体工程学和临床应用的人体躯干综合有限元肌肉骨骼模型的开发和验证。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Farshid Ghezelbash, Amir Hossein Eskandari, Amir Jafari Bidhendi, Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl, Christian Larivière
{"title":"具有人体工程学和临床应用的人体躯干综合有限元肌肉骨骼模型的开发和验证。","authors":"Farshid Ghezelbash, Amir Hossein Eskandari, Amir Jafari Bidhendi, Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl, Christian Larivière","doi":"10.1007/s10237-025-01983-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biomechanical modeling of the human trunk is crucial for understanding spinal mechanics and its role in ergonomics and clinical interventions. Traditional models have been limited by only considering the passive structures of the spine in finite element (FE) models or incorporating active muscular components in multi-body musculoskeletal (MS) models with an oversimplified spine. To address those limitations, we developed a subject-specific coupled FE-MS model of the trunk and explored its applications in ergonomics and surgical interventions. A parametric detailed FE model was constructed, integrated with a muscle architecture, and individualized based on existing datasets. Our comprehensive validation encompassed tissue-level responses, segment-level mechanics, and whole-spine behavior across multiple subjects and loading conditions, demonstrating satisfactory performance in ergonomics (i.e., wearing exoskeleton) and clinical interventions (nucleotomy and spinal fusion). The model accurately predicted tissue-level stresses (in uni- and biaxial loading), whole-spine motion (i.e., moment rotation response was in agreement with in vitro measurements), intradiscal pressures (RMSE = 0.12 MPa; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72), and muscle activities (matching EMG trends across 19 subjects during forward flexion). Wearing an exoskeleton reduced intradiscal pressures (1.9 vs. 2.2 MPa at L4-L5) and peak von Mises stresses in the annulus fibrosus (2.2 vs. 2.9 MPa) during forward flexion. Spinal fusion (at L4-L5) increased the intradiscal pressure in the upper adjacent disc (1.72 MPa vs. 1.58 MPa), but nucleotomy had a minimal effect on the intact intradiscal pressures. Nucleotomy substantially affected the load transfer at the same level by increasing facet contact loads and annulus radial strains. Unlike conventional MS models with simplified spine, and in contrast to passive models (without active components), this model provides crucial outputs such as strain/stress fields in discs/facets (essential for a comprehensive risk analysis). This integrated approach enables more accurate surgical planning, workplace safety design, and personalized rehabilitation strategies, helping reduce spine-related injuries by identifying risk factors and optimizing interventions for individual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a subject-specific integrated finite element musculoskeletal model of human trunk with ergonomic and clinical applications.\",\"authors\":\"Farshid Ghezelbash, Amir Hossein Eskandari, Amir Jafari Bidhendi, Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl, Christian Larivière\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10237-025-01983-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biomechanical modeling of the human trunk is crucial for understanding spinal mechanics and its role in ergonomics and clinical interventions. Traditional models have been limited by only considering the passive structures of the spine in finite element (FE) models or incorporating active muscular components in multi-body musculoskeletal (MS) models with an oversimplified spine. To address those limitations, we developed a subject-specific coupled FE-MS model of the trunk and explored its applications in ergonomics and surgical interventions. A parametric detailed FE model was constructed, integrated with a muscle architecture, and individualized based on existing datasets. Our comprehensive validation encompassed tissue-level responses, segment-level mechanics, and whole-spine behavior across multiple subjects and loading conditions, demonstrating satisfactory performance in ergonomics (i.e., wearing exoskeleton) and clinical interventions (nucleotomy and spinal fusion). The model accurately predicted tissue-level stresses (in uni- and biaxial loading), whole-spine motion (i.e., moment rotation response was in agreement with in vitro measurements), intradiscal pressures (RMSE = 0.12 MPa; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72), and muscle activities (matching EMG trends across 19 subjects during forward flexion). Wearing an exoskeleton reduced intradiscal pressures (1.9 vs. 2.2 MPa at L4-L5) and peak von Mises stresses in the annulus fibrosus (2.2 vs. 2.9 MPa) during forward flexion. Spinal fusion (at L4-L5) increased the intradiscal pressure in the upper adjacent disc (1.72 MPa vs. 1.58 MPa), but nucleotomy had a minimal effect on the intact intradiscal pressures. Nucleotomy substantially affected the load transfer at the same level by increasing facet contact loads and annulus radial strains. Unlike conventional MS models with simplified spine, and in contrast to passive models (without active components), this model provides crucial outputs such as strain/stress fields in discs/facets (essential for a comprehensive risk analysis). This integrated approach enables more accurate surgical planning, workplace safety design, and personalized rehabilitation strategies, helping reduce spine-related injuries by identifying risk factors and optimizing interventions for individual patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-025-01983-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-025-01983-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人体躯干的生物力学建模对于理解脊柱力学及其在人体工程学和临床干预中的作用至关重要。传统的模型在有限元(FE)模型中只考虑脊柱的被动结构,或在脊柱过于简化的多体肌肉骨骼(MS)模型中考虑主动肌肉成分。为了解决这些限制,我们开发了一个受试者特定的耦合FE-MS躯干模型,并探索其在人体工程学和外科干预中的应用。构建参数化详细有限元模型,结合肌肉结构,并基于现有数据集进行个性化。我们的综合验证包括组织水平的反应,节段水平的力学,以及跨多个受试者和负载条件的整个脊柱行为,在人体工程学(即佩戴外骨骼)和临床干预(核切开术和脊柱融合)方面表现出令人满意的表现。该模型准确预测了组织水平的应力(在单轴和双轴载荷下),整个脊柱运动(即力矩旋转响应与体外测量一致),椎间盘内压力(RMSE = 0.12 MPa;R2 = 0.72)和肌肉活动(与19名受试者在前屈时的肌电图趋势相符)。佩戴外骨骼可降低前屈时腰椎间盘内压力(L4-L5处1.9 vs 2.2 MPa)和纤维环峰值von Mises应力(2.2 vs 2.9 MPa)。脊柱融合术(L4-L5)增加了相邻上盘的椎间盘内压力(1.72 MPa vs 1.58 MPa),但核切开术对完整的椎间盘内压力影响很小。核切开术通过增加关节面接触载荷和环空径向应变,在相同水平上显著影响载荷传递。与具有简化脊柱的传统MS模型不同,与被动模型(没有主动组件)相比,该模型提供了关键的输出,例如椎间盘/面中的应变/应力场(对于全面的风险分析至关重要)。这种综合方法可以实现更精确的手术计划、工作场所安全设计和个性化康复策略,通过识别风险因素和优化个体患者的干预措施,帮助减少脊柱相关损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a subject-specific integrated finite element musculoskeletal model of human trunk with ergonomic and clinical applications.

Biomechanical modeling of the human trunk is crucial for understanding spinal mechanics and its role in ergonomics and clinical interventions. Traditional models have been limited by only considering the passive structures of the spine in finite element (FE) models or incorporating active muscular components in multi-body musculoskeletal (MS) models with an oversimplified spine. To address those limitations, we developed a subject-specific coupled FE-MS model of the trunk and explored its applications in ergonomics and surgical interventions. A parametric detailed FE model was constructed, integrated with a muscle architecture, and individualized based on existing datasets. Our comprehensive validation encompassed tissue-level responses, segment-level mechanics, and whole-spine behavior across multiple subjects and loading conditions, demonstrating satisfactory performance in ergonomics (i.e., wearing exoskeleton) and clinical interventions (nucleotomy and spinal fusion). The model accurately predicted tissue-level stresses (in uni- and biaxial loading), whole-spine motion (i.e., moment rotation response was in agreement with in vitro measurements), intradiscal pressures (RMSE = 0.12 MPa; R2 = 0.72), and muscle activities (matching EMG trends across 19 subjects during forward flexion). Wearing an exoskeleton reduced intradiscal pressures (1.9 vs. 2.2 MPa at L4-L5) and peak von Mises stresses in the annulus fibrosus (2.2 vs. 2.9 MPa) during forward flexion. Spinal fusion (at L4-L5) increased the intradiscal pressure in the upper adjacent disc (1.72 MPa vs. 1.58 MPa), but nucleotomy had a minimal effect on the intact intradiscal pressures. Nucleotomy substantially affected the load transfer at the same level by increasing facet contact loads and annulus radial strains. Unlike conventional MS models with simplified spine, and in contrast to passive models (without active components), this model provides crucial outputs such as strain/stress fields in discs/facets (essential for a comprehensive risk analysis). This integrated approach enables more accurate surgical planning, workplace safety design, and personalized rehabilitation strategies, helping reduce spine-related injuries by identifying risk factors and optimizing interventions for individual patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信