使用引导法评估考试问题:在R和SPSS中的实际应用与案例研究。

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Changiz Mohiyeddini
{"title":"使用引导法评估考试问题:在R和SPSS中的实际应用与案例研究。","authors":"Changiz Mohiyeddini","doi":"10.1002/ase.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents a step-by-step guide to using R and SPSS to bootstrap exam questions. Bootstrapping, a versatile nonparametric analytical technique, can help to improve the psychometric qualities of exam questions in the process of quality assurance. Bootstrapping is particularly useful in disciplines such as medical education, where student cohorts are normally too small to reliably use parametric analysis to evaluate the quality of exam questions. Traditional parametric approaches need large samples; otherwise, they can yield unreliable estimates of metrics such as item difficulty and point-biserial correlations with small cohorts, potentially misleading the evaluation of exam questions and consequently leading to flawed assessments. By employing bootstrapping, educators can resample data to obtain robust confidence intervals for key metrics. This allows for a more accurate evaluation of question quality. This guide provides a step-by-step approach using R and SPSS, along with explaining the necessary code to bootstrap exam question means, standard deviations, item difficulty, and point-biserial correlations. In addition, the code includes automated visualizations and the capability to export results in reader-friendly tables, enhancing time efficiency and streamlining both data analysis and presentation processes. Furthermore, this article includes a case study in which the code is applied and the results are discussed to showcase how bootstrapping can inform decisions regarding exam question revisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of exam questions using bootstrapping: Practical applications in R and SPSS with a case study.\",\"authors\":\"Changiz Mohiyeddini\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ase.70082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article presents a step-by-step guide to using R and SPSS to bootstrap exam questions. Bootstrapping, a versatile nonparametric analytical technique, can help to improve the psychometric qualities of exam questions in the process of quality assurance. Bootstrapping is particularly useful in disciplines such as medical education, where student cohorts are normally too small to reliably use parametric analysis to evaluate the quality of exam questions. Traditional parametric approaches need large samples; otherwise, they can yield unreliable estimates of metrics such as item difficulty and point-biserial correlations with small cohorts, potentially misleading the evaluation of exam questions and consequently leading to flawed assessments. By employing bootstrapping, educators can resample data to obtain robust confidence intervals for key metrics. This allows for a more accurate evaluation of question quality. This guide provides a step-by-step approach using R and SPSS, along with explaining the necessary code to bootstrap exam question means, standard deviations, item difficulty, and point-biserial correlations. In addition, the code includes automated visualizations and the capability to export results in reader-friendly tables, enhancing time efficiency and streamlining both data analysis and presentation processes. Furthermore, this article includes a case study in which the code is applied and the results are discussed to showcase how bootstrapping can inform decisions regarding exam question revisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将逐步介绍如何使用R和SPSS引导考试问题。Bootstrapping是一种通用的非参数分析技术,在质量保证的过程中有助于提高试题的心理测量质量。自举法在医学教育等学科中特别有用,因为这些学科的学生群体通常太小,无法可靠地使用参数分析来评估试题的质量。传统的参数化方法需要大样本;否则,它们可能会产生不可靠的指标估计,如项目难度和与小队列的点双序列相关性,可能会误导对考试问题的评估,从而导致有缺陷的评估。通过采用引导,教育工作者可以重新采样数据,以获得关键指标的稳健置信区间。这样可以更准确地评估问题的质量。本指南提供了一个循序渐进的方法,使用R和SPSS,以及解释必要的代码来引导考试问题的均值,标准差,项目难度,和点双列相关性。此外,该代码还包括自动可视化和以对读者友好的表格形式导出结果的功能,从而提高了时间效率并简化了数据分析和表示过程。此外,本文还包括一个案例研究,其中应用了代码并讨论了结果,以展示引导如何为有关考试问题修订的决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of exam questions using bootstrapping: Practical applications in R and SPSS with a case study.

This article presents a step-by-step guide to using R and SPSS to bootstrap exam questions. Bootstrapping, a versatile nonparametric analytical technique, can help to improve the psychometric qualities of exam questions in the process of quality assurance. Bootstrapping is particularly useful in disciplines such as medical education, where student cohorts are normally too small to reliably use parametric analysis to evaluate the quality of exam questions. Traditional parametric approaches need large samples; otherwise, they can yield unreliable estimates of metrics such as item difficulty and point-biserial correlations with small cohorts, potentially misleading the evaluation of exam questions and consequently leading to flawed assessments. By employing bootstrapping, educators can resample data to obtain robust confidence intervals for key metrics. This allows for a more accurate evaluation of question quality. This guide provides a step-by-step approach using R and SPSS, along with explaining the necessary code to bootstrap exam question means, standard deviations, item difficulty, and point-biserial correlations. In addition, the code includes automated visualizations and the capability to export results in reader-friendly tables, enhancing time efficiency and streamlining both data analysis and presentation processes. Furthermore, this article includes a case study in which the code is applied and the results are discussed to showcase how bootstrapping can inform decisions regarding exam question revisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信