河口系统浊度估算用透明管的校正

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 LIMNOLOGY
Makenna Thompson, Erik Smith, James L. Pinckney
{"title":"河口系统浊度估算用透明管的校正","authors":"Makenna Thompson,&nbsp;Erik Smith,&nbsp;James L. Pinckney","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Turbidity, quantified in turbidity units (nephelometric or formazin), is a common and valid measure of water quality related to transparency. A transparency tube (TT) is an economical tool developed to estimate water clarity as an alternative to the Secchi disk, but it is also frequently used to estimate turbidity. Although the relationship between TT measures and turbidity is well characterized for freshwater river and lake systems, this relationship has not been tested for estuarine waters. The objective of the current study was to empirically determine the TT–turbidity relationship for estuarine waters in coastal South Carolina (SC) and compare these results with the traditional freshwater system conversions. We obtained 107 measurements of TT depth, turbidity, total suspended solids, colored dissolved organic matter absorbance, Secchi depth, and chlorophyll <i>a</i> at 22 estuarine locations in SC over a 1-year period. Linear regressions provide conversion equations that can be applied to SC estuarine waters. The TT–turbidity relationship for estuaries was compared with freshwater systems. Our results suggest that the slope of the relationship differs between systems (−1.11 vs. −1.41), resulting in different turbidity estimates for TT measurements for estuarine vs. inland waters. We propose a combined conversion table incorporating estuarine and freshwater (riverine and lacustrine) systems. A TT–turbidity conversion for coastal SC and similar estuarine waters significantly benefits current water quality programs and citizen science groups by producing more accurate turbidity estimates for screening and routine monitoring efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":"23 7","pages":"500-508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10695","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibration of the transparency tube for estimating turbidity in estuarine systems\",\"authors\":\"Makenna Thompson,&nbsp;Erik Smith,&nbsp;James L. Pinckney\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lom3.10695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Turbidity, quantified in turbidity units (nephelometric or formazin), is a common and valid measure of water quality related to transparency. A transparency tube (TT) is an economical tool developed to estimate water clarity as an alternative to the Secchi disk, but it is also frequently used to estimate turbidity. Although the relationship between TT measures and turbidity is well characterized for freshwater river and lake systems, this relationship has not been tested for estuarine waters. The objective of the current study was to empirically determine the TT–turbidity relationship for estuarine waters in coastal South Carolina (SC) and compare these results with the traditional freshwater system conversions. We obtained 107 measurements of TT depth, turbidity, total suspended solids, colored dissolved organic matter absorbance, Secchi depth, and chlorophyll <i>a</i> at 22 estuarine locations in SC over a 1-year period. Linear regressions provide conversion equations that can be applied to SC estuarine waters. The TT–turbidity relationship for estuaries was compared with freshwater systems. Our results suggest that the slope of the relationship differs between systems (−1.11 vs. −1.41), resulting in different turbidity estimates for TT measurements for estuarine vs. inland waters. We propose a combined conversion table incorporating estuarine and freshwater (riverine and lacustrine) systems. A TT–turbidity conversion for coastal SC and similar estuarine waters significantly benefits current water quality programs and citizen science groups by producing more accurate turbidity estimates for screening and routine monitoring efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods\",\"volume\":\"23 7\",\"pages\":\"500-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10695\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10695\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

浊度,以浊度单位(浊度计或甲肼)量化,是与透明度相关的水质的常见和有效的测量。透明管(TT)是一种经济的工具,用于估计水的清晰度,作为塞奇盘的替代品,但它也经常用于估计浊度。虽然TT测量和浑浊度之间的关系在淡水河流和湖泊系统中得到了很好的表征,但这种关系尚未在河口水域中得到检验。当前研究的目的是通过经验确定南卡罗来纳州沿海河口水域的tt -浊度关系,并将这些结果与传统的淡水系统转换进行比较。在1年的时间里,我们在SC的22个河口位置获得了107个TT深度、浊度、总悬浮物、有色溶解有机质吸光度、Secchi深度和叶绿素a的测量结果。线性回归提供了可应用于SC河口水域的转换方程。将河口的tt -浊度关系与淡水系统进行了比较。我们的结果表明,系统之间关系的斜率不同(- 1.11 vs. - 1.41),导致河口和内陆水域TT测量的浊度估计值不同。我们提出了一个结合河口和淡水(河流和湖泊)系统的组合转换表。沿海SC和类似河口水域的tt浊度转换通过为筛选和常规监测工作提供更准确的浊度估算,大大有利于当前的水质计划和公民科学团体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Calibration of the transparency tube for estimating turbidity in estuarine systems

Calibration of the transparency tube for estimating turbidity in estuarine systems

Turbidity, quantified in turbidity units (nephelometric or formazin), is a common and valid measure of water quality related to transparency. A transparency tube (TT) is an economical tool developed to estimate water clarity as an alternative to the Secchi disk, but it is also frequently used to estimate turbidity. Although the relationship between TT measures and turbidity is well characterized for freshwater river and lake systems, this relationship has not been tested for estuarine waters. The objective of the current study was to empirically determine the TT–turbidity relationship for estuarine waters in coastal South Carolina (SC) and compare these results with the traditional freshwater system conversions. We obtained 107 measurements of TT depth, turbidity, total suspended solids, colored dissolved organic matter absorbance, Secchi depth, and chlorophyll a at 22 estuarine locations in SC over a 1-year period. Linear regressions provide conversion equations that can be applied to SC estuarine waters. The TT–turbidity relationship for estuaries was compared with freshwater systems. Our results suggest that the slope of the relationship differs between systems (−1.11 vs. −1.41), resulting in different turbidity estimates for TT measurements for estuarine vs. inland waters. We propose a combined conversion table incorporating estuarine and freshwater (riverine and lacustrine) systems. A TT–turbidity conversion for coastal SC and similar estuarine waters significantly benefits current water quality programs and citizen science groups by producing more accurate turbidity estimates for screening and routine monitoring efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信