采取行动避免灭绝:成功的区域范围内对横斑猫头鹰的致命控制支持了联邦拯救斑点猫头鹰的战略

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Brendan K. Hobart, Daniel F. Hofstadter, J. Mark Higley, Keith A. Hamm, Brian P. Dotters, Kevin N. Roberts, Renée L. Cormier, Alan B. Franklin, William J. Berigan, John J. Keane, William W. Merkle, David T. Press, M. Zachariah Peery
{"title":"采取行动避免灭绝:成功的区域范围内对横斑猫头鹰的致命控制支持了联邦拯救斑点猫头鹰的战略","authors":"Brendan K. Hobart,&nbsp;Daniel F. Hofstadter,&nbsp;J. Mark Higley,&nbsp;Keith A. Hamm,&nbsp;Brian P. Dotters,&nbsp;Kevin N. Roberts,&nbsp;Renée L. Cormier,&nbsp;Alan B. Franklin,&nbsp;William J. Berigan,&nbsp;John J. Keane,&nbsp;William W. Merkle,&nbsp;David T. Press,&nbsp;M. Zachariah Peery","doi":"10.1111/conl.13121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Invasive species disrupt biological communities, but lethal control of invaders often meets staunch resistance, posing a conundrum for policymakers. For instance, the human-mediated spread of barred owls from eastern to western North America threatens numerous native species—including the iconic and listed spotted owl—spurring intense debate about whether to lethally control this charismatic but invasive species. A recent US Fish and Wildlife Service strategy, in particular, has drawn strong criticism based on untested claims that barred owl control is unscalable and doomed to failure. Contrary to such claims, we conducted successful lethal controls across &gt;50,000 km<sup>2</sup> in California, removing 3373 barred owls—around one third of the state's current population. Critically, monitoring revealed that removals stabilized spotted owl populations and halted the establishment of barred owls. Our work provides direct support for the federal strategy to address this pressing issue and highlights general strategies to maximize conservation while minimizing invader killing.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking Action to Avoid Extinction: Successful Regional-Scale Lethal Control of Barred Owls Supports a Federal Strategy to Save Spotted Owls\",\"authors\":\"Brendan K. Hobart,&nbsp;Daniel F. Hofstadter,&nbsp;J. Mark Higley,&nbsp;Keith A. Hamm,&nbsp;Brian P. Dotters,&nbsp;Kevin N. Roberts,&nbsp;Renée L. Cormier,&nbsp;Alan B. Franklin,&nbsp;William J. Berigan,&nbsp;John J. Keane,&nbsp;William W. Merkle,&nbsp;David T. Press,&nbsp;M. Zachariah Peery\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/conl.13121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Invasive species disrupt biological communities, but lethal control of invaders often meets staunch resistance, posing a conundrum for policymakers. For instance, the human-mediated spread of barred owls from eastern to western North America threatens numerous native species—including the iconic and listed spotted owl—spurring intense debate about whether to lethally control this charismatic but invasive species. A recent US Fish and Wildlife Service strategy, in particular, has drawn strong criticism based on untested claims that barred owl control is unscalable and doomed to failure. Contrary to such claims, we conducted successful lethal controls across &gt;50,000 km<sup>2</sup> in California, removing 3373 barred owls—around one third of the state's current population. Critically, monitoring revealed that removals stabilized spotted owl populations and halted the establishment of barred owls. Our work provides direct support for the federal strategy to address this pressing issue and highlights general strategies to maximize conservation while minimizing invader killing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13121\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13121\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13121","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

入侵物种破坏了生物群落,但对入侵者的致命控制往往会遇到顽强的抵抗,这给政策制定者带来了难题。例如,横斑猫头鹰从北美东部到西部的人为传播威胁着许多本地物种——包括标志性的和已列入名单的斑点猫头鹰——引发了关于是否要致命控制这种有魅力但入侵物种的激烈辩论。美国鱼类和野生动物管理局最近的一项战略尤其受到了强烈的批评,该战略基于未经检验的说法,即禁止猫头鹰的控制是不可扩展的,注定要失败。与这种说法相反,我们在加州5万平方公里的范围内成功地实施了致命控制,消灭了3373只横斑猫头鹰——大约是该州目前人口的三分之一。至关重要的是,监测显示,清除活动稳定了斑点猫头鹰的数量,并阻止了横斑猫头鹰的建立。我们的工作为解决这一紧迫问题的联邦战略提供了直接支持,并强调了在最大限度地减少入侵者杀戮的同时最大限度地保护动物的一般策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Taking Action to Avoid Extinction: Successful Regional-Scale Lethal Control of Barred Owls Supports a Federal Strategy to Save Spotted Owls

Taking Action to Avoid Extinction: Successful Regional-Scale Lethal Control of Barred Owls Supports a Federal Strategy to Save Spotted Owls

Invasive species disrupt biological communities, but lethal control of invaders often meets staunch resistance, posing a conundrum for policymakers. For instance, the human-mediated spread of barred owls from eastern to western North America threatens numerous native species—including the iconic and listed spotted owl—spurring intense debate about whether to lethally control this charismatic but invasive species. A recent US Fish and Wildlife Service strategy, in particular, has drawn strong criticism based on untested claims that barred owl control is unscalable and doomed to failure. Contrary to such claims, we conducted successful lethal controls across >50,000 km2 in California, removing 3373 barred owls—around one third of the state's current population. Critically, monitoring revealed that removals stabilized spotted owl populations and halted the establishment of barred owls. Our work provides direct support for the federal strategy to address this pressing issue and highlights general strategies to maximize conservation while minimizing invader killing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信