Md. Rasel Parvej, Shaun Casteel, Mark Zarnstorff, James H. Houx, Mark A. Licht
{"title":"大豆落叶对冠层恢复、产量和种子品质的影响","authors":"Md. Rasel Parvej, Shaun Casteel, Mark Zarnstorff, James H. Houx, Mark A. Licht","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] yield loss from hailstorms depends on the growth stage when hail occurs and the magnitude of plant damage. We evaluated how soybean canopy recovery, yield, and seed quality were affected by simulated hail damage in Iowa and Indiana from 2016 to 2018. Five levels of hail damage were simulated by defoliating 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% leaves at the full-pod (R4) and beginning of seed-fill (R5) stages. Canopy closure was similar for plants with 0%–50% defoliation but significantly reduced for plants with 75% and 100% defoliation. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and normalized difference red edge index (NDRE) predicted defoliation levels better than canopy closure, with NDRE being more sensitive for detecting canopy variation among defoliation rates. Soybean yield and yield components decreased quadratically with increasing defoliation severity. Yield loss was minimal with 25% defoliation, regardless of growth stage or location. Soybean yield declined more with 100% defoliation at the R5 stage (80%–83%) compared to the R4 stage (67%–79%). The yield loss when plants were defoliated greater than 25% was due to a reduction in seed numbers (up to 54–88 seeds plant<sup>−1</sup>) and seed weight (up to 0.022–0.052 g seed<sup>−1</sup>). Defoliation at both stages minimally affected seed protein but decreased oil concentrations when defoliation reached 75%–100%. Soybean yield and seed quality loss should not be an issue of concern for fields with up to 25% hail defoliation damage at the R4–R5 stages. Results will help refine crop insurance guidelines, improving damage assessment for farmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of soybean defoliation on canopy recovery, yield, and seed quality\",\"authors\":\"Md. Rasel Parvej, Shaun Casteel, Mark Zarnstorff, James H. Houx, Mark A. Licht\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] yield loss from hailstorms depends on the growth stage when hail occurs and the magnitude of plant damage. We evaluated how soybean canopy recovery, yield, and seed quality were affected by simulated hail damage in Iowa and Indiana from 2016 to 2018. Five levels of hail damage were simulated by defoliating 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% leaves at the full-pod (R4) and beginning of seed-fill (R5) stages. Canopy closure was similar for plants with 0%–50% defoliation but significantly reduced for plants with 75% and 100% defoliation. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and normalized difference red edge index (NDRE) predicted defoliation levels better than canopy closure, with NDRE being more sensitive for detecting canopy variation among defoliation rates. Soybean yield and yield components decreased quadratically with increasing defoliation severity. Yield loss was minimal with 25% defoliation, regardless of growth stage or location. Soybean yield declined more with 100% defoliation at the R5 stage (80%–83%) compared to the R4 stage (67%–79%). The yield loss when plants were defoliated greater than 25% was due to a reduction in seed numbers (up to 54–88 seeds plant<sup>−1</sup>) and seed weight (up to 0.022–0.052 g seed<sup>−1</sup>). Defoliation at both stages minimally affected seed protein but decreased oil concentrations when defoliation reached 75%–100%. Soybean yield and seed quality loss should not be an issue of concern for fields with up to 25% hail defoliation damage at the R4–R5 stages. Results will help refine crop insurance guidelines, improving damage assessment for farmers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70105\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70105\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]稳定。冰雹造成的产量损失取决于冰雹发生时的生长阶段和对植物的损害程度。我们评估了2016年至2018年爱荷华州和印第安纳州模拟冰雹灾害对大豆冠层恢复、产量和种子质量的影响。在全荚期(R4)和灌种期(R5)分别取0%、25%、50%、75%和100%叶片,模拟5个等级的冰雹危害。凋落率为0% ~ 50%的植物的冠层闭合与凋落率相似,而凋落率为75%和100%的植物的冠层闭合显著降低。归一化植被指数(NDVI)和归一化红边指数(NDRE)对落叶水平的预测效果优于冠层闭合度,且NDRE对冠层落叶率变化的检测更为敏感。大豆产量和产量成分随落叶严重程度的增加呈二次递减。无论生长阶段或生长地点,25%的落叶产量损失最小。与R4期(67%-79%)相比,R5期100%落叶的大豆产量下降幅度更大(80%-83%)。当植物落叶量大于25%时,产量损失是由于种子数量减少(最多54-88粒/株)和种子重量减少(最多0.022-0.052 g /株)。两个阶段的脱叶对种子蛋白质的影响最小,但当脱叶达到75%-100%时,籽油浓度降低。在R4-R5阶段,大豆产量和种子质量损失不应成为冰雹落叶损失率高达25%的田地的问题。研究结果将有助于完善农作物保险指南,改善农民的损失评估。
Impact of soybean defoliation on canopy recovery, yield, and seed quality
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield loss from hailstorms depends on the growth stage when hail occurs and the magnitude of plant damage. We evaluated how soybean canopy recovery, yield, and seed quality were affected by simulated hail damage in Iowa and Indiana from 2016 to 2018. Five levels of hail damage were simulated by defoliating 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% leaves at the full-pod (R4) and beginning of seed-fill (R5) stages. Canopy closure was similar for plants with 0%–50% defoliation but significantly reduced for plants with 75% and 100% defoliation. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and normalized difference red edge index (NDRE) predicted defoliation levels better than canopy closure, with NDRE being more sensitive for detecting canopy variation among defoliation rates. Soybean yield and yield components decreased quadratically with increasing defoliation severity. Yield loss was minimal with 25% defoliation, regardless of growth stage or location. Soybean yield declined more with 100% defoliation at the R5 stage (80%–83%) compared to the R4 stage (67%–79%). The yield loss when plants were defoliated greater than 25% was due to a reduction in seed numbers (up to 54–88 seeds plant−1) and seed weight (up to 0.022–0.052 g seed−1). Defoliation at both stages minimally affected seed protein but decreased oil concentrations when defoliation reached 75%–100%. Soybean yield and seed quality loss should not be an issue of concern for fields with up to 25% hail defoliation damage at the R4–R5 stages. Results will help refine crop insurance guidelines, improving damage assessment for farmers.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.