与老年人共同设计健康创新的方法:快速回顾

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Léa Blouin Gagnon, Samuel Turcotte, Roxane DeBroux-Leduc, Philippe Gauthier, Nathalie Bier
{"title":"与老年人共同设计健康创新的方法:快速回顾","authors":"Léa Blouin Gagnon,&nbsp;Samuel Turcotte,&nbsp;Roxane DeBroux-Leduc,&nbsp;Philippe Gauthier,&nbsp;Nathalie Bier","doi":"10.1111/ajag.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This paper reviews the methods used in research for co-designing health innovations with and for older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A rapid review was performed following the Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group recommendations and reported using the PRISMA statement. A keyword search was conducted in CINAHL, PsychINFO and Medline databases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Selection criteria yielded 13 peer-reviewed articles that reported on a total of 33 different co-design activities. Discussions and individual interviews were the most frequently reported activities in the selected articles and were used at each stage of the co-design process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>To avoid the appearance of tokenism and to promote transparency, researchers need to provide more details about the involvement of older adults in the co-design process and the co-design activities performed. Health and design scientists should strive towards a meaningful involvement of older adults throughout the co-designing process and need to develop knowledge about the added value of co-design to support the use of such methods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for co-designing health innovations with older adults: A rapid review\",\"authors\":\"Léa Blouin Gagnon,&nbsp;Samuel Turcotte,&nbsp;Roxane DeBroux-Leduc,&nbsp;Philippe Gauthier,&nbsp;Nathalie Bier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajag.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper reviews the methods used in research for co-designing health innovations with and for older adults.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A rapid review was performed following the Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group recommendations and reported using the PRISMA statement. A keyword search was conducted in CINAHL, PsychINFO and Medline databases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Selection criteria yielded 13 peer-reviewed articles that reported on a total of 33 different co-design activities. Discussions and individual interviews were the most frequently reported activities in the selected articles and were used at each stage of the co-design process.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>To avoid the appearance of tokenism and to promote transparency, researchers need to provide more details about the involvement of older adults in the co-design process and the co-design activities performed. Health and design scientists should strive towards a meaningful involvement of older adults throughout the co-designing process and need to develop knowledge about the added value of co-design to support the use of such methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal on Ageing\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal on Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.70065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的综述了与老年人共同设计健康创新的研究方法。方法按照Cochrane快速回顾方法组的建议进行快速回顾,并使用PRISMA声明进行报告。在CINAHL、PsychINFO和Medline数据库中进行关键词检索。选择标准产生了13篇同行评议的文章,共报道了33种不同的共同设计活动。讨论和个人访谈是所选文章中最常报道的活动,并用于共同设计过程的每个阶段。为了避免表面上的象征主义,提高透明度,研究人员需要提供更多关于老年人参与共同设计过程和共同设计活动的细节。健康和设计科学家应努力使老年人有意义地参与整个共同设计过程,并需要发展有关共同设计的附加价值的知识,以支持这些方法的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Methods for co-designing health innovations with older adults: A rapid review

Methods for co-designing health innovations with older adults: A rapid review

Objective

This paper reviews the methods used in research for co-designing health innovations with and for older adults.

Methods

A rapid review was performed following the Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group recommendations and reported using the PRISMA statement. A keyword search was conducted in CINAHL, PsychINFO and Medline databases.

Results

Selection criteria yielded 13 peer-reviewed articles that reported on a total of 33 different co-design activities. Discussions and individual interviews were the most frequently reported activities in the selected articles and were used at each stage of the co-design process.

Conclusion

To avoid the appearance of tokenism and to promote transparency, researchers need to provide more details about the involvement of older adults in the co-design process and the co-design activities performed. Health and design scientists should strive towards a meaningful involvement of older adults throughout the co-designing process and need to develop knowledge about the added value of co-design to support the use of such methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信