从降低风险到绿色开采:里奥尼河谷运动和后苏联格鲁吉亚可再生基础设施的殖民化

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Lela Rekhviashvili, Aleksandra Aroshvili
{"title":"从降低风险到绿色开采:里奥尼河谷运动和后苏联格鲁吉亚可再生基础设施的殖民化","authors":"Lela Rekhviashvili,&nbsp;Aleksandra Aroshvili","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on an analysis of the Rioni Valley Movement and the historical transformation of energy politics in Georgia, we challenge prevailing explanations of the promotion and contestation of hydropower infrastructure as driven by homegrown authoritarianism or Russia's (neo)imperial politics. Instead, we propose a framework of coloniality of infrastructure and green extractivism to study Georgia and other parts of the postsocialist East alongside the postcolonial contexts of the global South. The East increasingly resembles these contexts, exhibiting new iterations of coloniality in relation to the West/North, and serves as one of the frontiers of green extractivism. We argue that derisking has become integral to the mode of regulation that underpins green extractivism – a mode of capital accumulation by dispossession and appropriation in peripheries. Derisking creates an unequal distribution of risks and returns by requiring states to commit their fiscal capacities to future-proof investor returns at all costs. It assures that renewables are not just <em>extractive</em>, or harvesting energy, but <em>extractivist</em>, or serving distant people and geographies while aligning with the profitability needs of financial capital and the consumption needs of decarbonizing classes. Derisked renewables inflict harm locally and deepen the subaltern integration of (sub)national and world-regional peripheries within the capitalist world-ecology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103381"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From derisking to green extractivism: The Rioni Valley Movement and the coloniality of renewable infrastructure in Post-Soviet Georgia\",\"authors\":\"Lela Rekhviashvili,&nbsp;Aleksandra Aroshvili\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Based on an analysis of the Rioni Valley Movement and the historical transformation of energy politics in Georgia, we challenge prevailing explanations of the promotion and contestation of hydropower infrastructure as driven by homegrown authoritarianism or Russia's (neo)imperial politics. Instead, we propose a framework of coloniality of infrastructure and green extractivism to study Georgia and other parts of the postsocialist East alongside the postcolonial contexts of the global South. The East increasingly resembles these contexts, exhibiting new iterations of coloniality in relation to the West/North, and serves as one of the frontiers of green extractivism. We argue that derisking has become integral to the mode of regulation that underpins green extractivism – a mode of capital accumulation by dispossession and appropriation in peripheries. Derisking creates an unequal distribution of risks and returns by requiring states to commit their fiscal capacities to future-proof investor returns at all costs. It assures that renewables are not just <em>extractive</em>, or harvesting energy, but <em>extractivist</em>, or serving distant people and geographies while aligning with the profitability needs of financial capital and the consumption needs of decarbonizing classes. Derisked renewables inflict harm locally and deepen the subaltern integration of (sub)national and world-regional peripheries within the capitalist world-ecology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Geography\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825001131\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825001131","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于对里奥尼河谷运动和格鲁吉亚能源政治历史转型的分析,我们挑战了对水电基础设施的推广和争论的普遍解释,认为这是由本土威权主义或俄罗斯(新)帝国政治驱动的。相反,我们提出了一个基础设施和绿色开采主义的殖民主义框架,以研究格鲁吉亚和后社会主义东方的其他地区,以及全球南方的后殖民背景。东方越来越像这些背景,表现出与西方/北方相关的殖民主义的新迭代,并成为绿色采掘主义的前沿之一。我们认为,降低风险已经成为支持绿色采掘主义的监管模式的组成部分——绿色采掘主义是一种在边缘地区通过剥夺和占有来积累资本的模式。去风险化要求各国不惜一切代价,将自己的财政能力用于保障投资者未来的回报,从而造成了风险和回报的不平等分配。它确保了可再生能源不仅仅是采掘性的,或者是收获能源,而是采掘性的,或者是服务于遥远的人们和地域,同时与金融资本的盈利需求和脱碳阶层的消费需求保持一致。无风险的可再生能源对地方造成伤害,并加深了资本主义世界生态中(次)国家和世界区域边缘的底层整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From derisking to green extractivism: The Rioni Valley Movement and the coloniality of renewable infrastructure in Post-Soviet Georgia
Based on an analysis of the Rioni Valley Movement and the historical transformation of energy politics in Georgia, we challenge prevailing explanations of the promotion and contestation of hydropower infrastructure as driven by homegrown authoritarianism or Russia's (neo)imperial politics. Instead, we propose a framework of coloniality of infrastructure and green extractivism to study Georgia and other parts of the postsocialist East alongside the postcolonial contexts of the global South. The East increasingly resembles these contexts, exhibiting new iterations of coloniality in relation to the West/North, and serves as one of the frontiers of green extractivism. We argue that derisking has become integral to the mode of regulation that underpins green extractivism – a mode of capital accumulation by dispossession and appropriation in peripheries. Derisking creates an unequal distribution of risks and returns by requiring states to commit their fiscal capacities to future-proof investor returns at all costs. It assures that renewables are not just extractive, or harvesting energy, but extractivist, or serving distant people and geographies while aligning with the profitability needs of financial capital and the consumption needs of decarbonizing classes. Derisked renewables inflict harm locally and deepen the subaltern integration of (sub)national and world-regional peripheries within the capitalist world-ecology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信