不同干燥方式对山茶品质的影响:利用人工神经网络研究山茶品质参数和干燥动力学

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Muhammed Emin Topal, Birol Şahi̇n
{"title":"不同干燥方式对山茶品质的影响:利用人工神经网络研究山茶品质参数和干燥动力学","authors":"Muhammed Emin Topal,&nbsp;Birol Şahi̇n","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to compare the drying kinetics and quality outcomes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods—freeze drying (FD), hot air drying (HAD), infrared drying (ID), and microwave drying (MWD). Six thin-layer drying models (Alibas, Demir et al. Henderson &amp; Pabis, Improved Midilli-Kucuk, Logarithmic, and Weibull) were fitted to the experimental data. Artificial neural network (ANN) models were also developed to predict the dimensionless moisture ratio (MR) using drying time and process parameters as inputs. The ANN model showed high prediction performance, with R<sup>2</sup> values reaching up to 0.9999. In addition, the ANN model achieved strong generalization performance, with Rc<sup>2</sup> = 0.9967, Rp<sup>2</sup> = 0.9132, and RPD = 3.3936, confirming its excellent predictive ability. Quality assessments revealed that FD preserved the highest antioxidant capacity (up to 94.7 ± 0.1 %), followed by MWD, HAD, and ID. The lowest water activity, enhancing shelf life, was observed in FD (0.29 ± 0.01 to 0.34 ± 0.01), while MWD showed the highest (0.41 ± 0.04 to 0.64 ± 0.01). Color analysis indicated the least change in FD and the most in ID. Overall, FD produced the highest quality tea, while MWD offered faster drying. ANN models effectively captured nonlinear drying behaviors. This integrated modeling and evaluation approach can support future optimization and quality control strategies in tea drying processes. Although the unified ANN yielded high accuracy (ALL R = 0.9999), model generalization is presently limited to laboratory-scale trials on a single tea cultivar. Further validation on industrial dryers and diverse leaf grades is required, and the ‘black-box’ nature of ANNs complicates direct physico-chemical interpretation. This is the first known study to integrate both artificial neural network (ANN) and mathematical modeling approaches to comprehensively assess the drying kinetics and quality attributes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 118172"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different drying methods on Camellia sinensis: Investigation of quality parameters and drying kinetics using artificial neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Emin Topal,&nbsp;Birol Şahi̇n\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to compare the drying kinetics and quality outcomes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods—freeze drying (FD), hot air drying (HAD), infrared drying (ID), and microwave drying (MWD). Six thin-layer drying models (Alibas, Demir et al. Henderson &amp; Pabis, Improved Midilli-Kucuk, Logarithmic, and Weibull) were fitted to the experimental data. Artificial neural network (ANN) models were also developed to predict the dimensionless moisture ratio (MR) using drying time and process parameters as inputs. The ANN model showed high prediction performance, with R<sup>2</sup> values reaching up to 0.9999. In addition, the ANN model achieved strong generalization performance, with Rc<sup>2</sup> = 0.9967, Rp<sup>2</sup> = 0.9132, and RPD = 3.3936, confirming its excellent predictive ability. Quality assessments revealed that FD preserved the highest antioxidant capacity (up to 94.7 ± 0.1 %), followed by MWD, HAD, and ID. The lowest water activity, enhancing shelf life, was observed in FD (0.29 ± 0.01 to 0.34 ± 0.01), while MWD showed the highest (0.41 ± 0.04 to 0.64 ± 0.01). Color analysis indicated the least change in FD and the most in ID. Overall, FD produced the highest quality tea, while MWD offered faster drying. ANN models effectively captured nonlinear drying behaviors. This integrated modeling and evaluation approach can support future optimization and quality control strategies in tea drying processes. Although the unified ANN yielded high accuracy (ALL R = 0.9999), model generalization is presently limited to laboratory-scale trials on a single tea cultivar. Further validation on industrial dryers and diverse leaf grades is required, and the ‘black-box’ nature of ANNs complicates direct physico-chemical interpretation. This is the first known study to integrate both artificial neural network (ANN) and mathematical modeling approaches to comprehensively assess the drying kinetics and quality attributes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LWT - Food Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LWT - Food Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643825008564\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643825008564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较冷冻干燥(FD)、热风干燥(HAD)、红外干燥(ID)和微波干燥(MWD)四种不同干燥方法对茶叶的干燥动力学和品质结果的影响。六种薄层干燥模型(Alibas, Demir等)。亨德森,采用Pabis、Improved midli - kucuk、Logarithmic、Weibull等方法拟合实验数据。以干燥时间和工艺参数为输入,建立了人工神经网络(ANN)模型来预测无量纲水分比(MR)。人工神经网络模型具有较高的预测性能,其R2值可达0.9999。此外,ANN模型具有较强的泛化性能,Rc2 = 0.9967, Rp2 = 0.9132, RPD = 3.3936,证实了其良好的预测能力。质量评估显示,FD保留了最高的抗氧化能力(高达94.7±0.1%),其次是MWD、HAD和ID。FD组水分活度最低(0.29±0.01 ~ 0.34±0.01),MWD组水分活度最高(0.41±0.04 ~ 0.64±0.01)。颜色分析显示FD变化最小,ID变化最大。总的来说,FD生产的茶叶质量最高,而MWD提供更快的干燥。人工神经网络模型有效地捕获了非线性干燥行为。这种综合建模和评价方法可以支持未来茶叶干燥过程的优化和质量控制策略。虽然统一的人工神经网络准确度很高(ALL R = 0.9999),但模型泛化目前仅限于单个茶叶品种的实验室规模试验。需要在工业干燥机和不同叶片等级上进行进一步验证,并且人工神经网络的“黑箱”性质使直接的物理化学解释复杂化。这是已知的第一个将人工神经网络(ANN)和数学建模方法结合起来,综合评估四种不同干燥方法下茶叶的干燥动力学和品质属性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of different drying methods on Camellia sinensis: Investigation of quality parameters and drying kinetics using artificial neural networks
This study aimed to compare the drying kinetics and quality outcomes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods—freeze drying (FD), hot air drying (HAD), infrared drying (ID), and microwave drying (MWD). Six thin-layer drying models (Alibas, Demir et al. Henderson & Pabis, Improved Midilli-Kucuk, Logarithmic, and Weibull) were fitted to the experimental data. Artificial neural network (ANN) models were also developed to predict the dimensionless moisture ratio (MR) using drying time and process parameters as inputs. The ANN model showed high prediction performance, with R2 values reaching up to 0.9999. In addition, the ANN model achieved strong generalization performance, with Rc2 = 0.9967, Rp2 = 0.9132, and RPD = 3.3936, confirming its excellent predictive ability. Quality assessments revealed that FD preserved the highest antioxidant capacity (up to 94.7 ± 0.1 %), followed by MWD, HAD, and ID. The lowest water activity, enhancing shelf life, was observed in FD (0.29 ± 0.01 to 0.34 ± 0.01), while MWD showed the highest (0.41 ± 0.04 to 0.64 ± 0.01). Color analysis indicated the least change in FD and the most in ID. Overall, FD produced the highest quality tea, while MWD offered faster drying. ANN models effectively captured nonlinear drying behaviors. This integrated modeling and evaluation approach can support future optimization and quality control strategies in tea drying processes. Although the unified ANN yielded high accuracy (ALL R = 0.9999), model generalization is presently limited to laboratory-scale trials on a single tea cultivar. Further validation on industrial dryers and diverse leaf grades is required, and the ‘black-box’ nature of ANNs complicates direct physico-chemical interpretation. This is the first known study to integrate both artificial neural network (ANN) and mathematical modeling approaches to comprehensively assess the drying kinetics and quality attributes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LWT - Food Science and Technology
LWT - Food Science and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1724
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信