{"title":"不同干燥方式对山茶品质的影响:利用人工神经网络研究山茶品质参数和干燥动力学","authors":"Muhammed Emin Topal, Birol Şahi̇n","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to compare the drying kinetics and quality outcomes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods—freeze drying (FD), hot air drying (HAD), infrared drying (ID), and microwave drying (MWD). Six thin-layer drying models (Alibas, Demir et al. Henderson & Pabis, Improved Midilli-Kucuk, Logarithmic, and Weibull) were fitted to the experimental data. Artificial neural network (ANN) models were also developed to predict the dimensionless moisture ratio (MR) using drying time and process parameters as inputs. The ANN model showed high prediction performance, with R<sup>2</sup> values reaching up to 0.9999. In addition, the ANN model achieved strong generalization performance, with Rc<sup>2</sup> = 0.9967, Rp<sup>2</sup> = 0.9132, and RPD = 3.3936, confirming its excellent predictive ability. Quality assessments revealed that FD preserved the highest antioxidant capacity (up to 94.7 ± 0.1 %), followed by MWD, HAD, and ID. The lowest water activity, enhancing shelf life, was observed in FD (0.29 ± 0.01 to 0.34 ± 0.01), while MWD showed the highest (0.41 ± 0.04 to 0.64 ± 0.01). Color analysis indicated the least change in FD and the most in ID. Overall, FD produced the highest quality tea, while MWD offered faster drying. ANN models effectively captured nonlinear drying behaviors. This integrated modeling and evaluation approach can support future optimization and quality control strategies in tea drying processes. Although the unified ANN yielded high accuracy (ALL R = 0.9999), model generalization is presently limited to laboratory-scale trials on a single tea cultivar. Further validation on industrial dryers and diverse leaf grades is required, and the ‘black-box’ nature of ANNs complicates direct physico-chemical interpretation. This is the first known study to integrate both artificial neural network (ANN) and mathematical modeling approaches to comprehensively assess the drying kinetics and quality attributes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 118172"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different drying methods on Camellia sinensis: Investigation of quality parameters and drying kinetics using artificial neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Emin Topal, Birol Şahi̇n\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to compare the drying kinetics and quality outcomes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods—freeze drying (FD), hot air drying (HAD), infrared drying (ID), and microwave drying (MWD). Six thin-layer drying models (Alibas, Demir et al. Henderson & Pabis, Improved Midilli-Kucuk, Logarithmic, and Weibull) were fitted to the experimental data. Artificial neural network (ANN) models were also developed to predict the dimensionless moisture ratio (MR) using drying time and process parameters as inputs. The ANN model showed high prediction performance, with R<sup>2</sup> values reaching up to 0.9999. In addition, the ANN model achieved strong generalization performance, with Rc<sup>2</sup> = 0.9967, Rp<sup>2</sup> = 0.9132, and RPD = 3.3936, confirming its excellent predictive ability. Quality assessments revealed that FD preserved the highest antioxidant capacity (up to 94.7 ± 0.1 %), followed by MWD, HAD, and ID. The lowest water activity, enhancing shelf life, was observed in FD (0.29 ± 0.01 to 0.34 ± 0.01), while MWD showed the highest (0.41 ± 0.04 to 0.64 ± 0.01). Color analysis indicated the least change in FD and the most in ID. Overall, FD produced the highest quality tea, while MWD offered faster drying. ANN models effectively captured nonlinear drying behaviors. This integrated modeling and evaluation approach can support future optimization and quality control strategies in tea drying processes. Although the unified ANN yielded high accuracy (ALL R = 0.9999), model generalization is presently limited to laboratory-scale trials on a single tea cultivar. Further validation on industrial dryers and diverse leaf grades is required, and the ‘black-box’ nature of ANNs complicates direct physico-chemical interpretation. This is the first known study to integrate both artificial neural network (ANN) and mathematical modeling approaches to comprehensively assess the drying kinetics and quality attributes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LWT - Food Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LWT - Food Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643825008564\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643825008564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of different drying methods on Camellia sinensis: Investigation of quality parameters and drying kinetics using artificial neural networks
This study aimed to compare the drying kinetics and quality outcomes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods—freeze drying (FD), hot air drying (HAD), infrared drying (ID), and microwave drying (MWD). Six thin-layer drying models (Alibas, Demir et al. Henderson & Pabis, Improved Midilli-Kucuk, Logarithmic, and Weibull) were fitted to the experimental data. Artificial neural network (ANN) models were also developed to predict the dimensionless moisture ratio (MR) using drying time and process parameters as inputs. The ANN model showed high prediction performance, with R2 values reaching up to 0.9999. In addition, the ANN model achieved strong generalization performance, with Rc2 = 0.9967, Rp2 = 0.9132, and RPD = 3.3936, confirming its excellent predictive ability. Quality assessments revealed that FD preserved the highest antioxidant capacity (up to 94.7 ± 0.1 %), followed by MWD, HAD, and ID. The lowest water activity, enhancing shelf life, was observed in FD (0.29 ± 0.01 to 0.34 ± 0.01), while MWD showed the highest (0.41 ± 0.04 to 0.64 ± 0.01). Color analysis indicated the least change in FD and the most in ID. Overall, FD produced the highest quality tea, while MWD offered faster drying. ANN models effectively captured nonlinear drying behaviors. This integrated modeling and evaluation approach can support future optimization and quality control strategies in tea drying processes. Although the unified ANN yielded high accuracy (ALL R = 0.9999), model generalization is presently limited to laboratory-scale trials on a single tea cultivar. Further validation on industrial dryers and diverse leaf grades is required, and the ‘black-box’ nature of ANNs complicates direct physico-chemical interpretation. This is the first known study to integrate both artificial neural network (ANN) and mathematical modeling approaches to comprehensively assess the drying kinetics and quality attributes of tea leaves subjected to four different drying methods.
期刊介绍:
LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.