评估医院急诊部门保密和妥善管理病史的重要性

Q4 Medicine
Amparo Ruiz Carbonell , Florencia Laffont Oscoz , Begoña Navarro Lluesma , Alexander Sammel , Ginés Gómez Úbeda , Miguel Ángel García García
{"title":"评估医院急诊部门保密和妥善管理病史的重要性","authors":"Amparo Ruiz Carbonell ,&nbsp;Florencia Laffont Oscoz ,&nbsp;Begoña Navarro Lluesma ,&nbsp;Alexander Sammel ,&nbsp;Ginés Gómez Úbeda ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel García García","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpsp.2025.100510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Healthcare professionals sometimes forget their obligations regarding professional secrecy and confidentiality. Violating them is punishable by law. We carried out a study to evaluate the degree of knowledge about the use of secrecy and confidentiality of patients' medical information in the care practice of the professionals of the Hospital Emergency Service of a second level hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous survey was designed with questions about daily activity in the Emergency Department related to confidentiality. They tried to evaluate, by all the professional groups involved in the care of patients in the Emergency Department, 4 aspects: the degree of workers' perception of confidentiality; knowledge in confidentiality and the desire to obtain that knowledge; the perception of unauthorized exchange or search for information; and the perception of physical means to safeguard privacy. The statistical tests chi-square, t-Student and ANOVA were used, with a level of statistical significance of <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>100 workers from all professional groups responded to the survey. Knowledge of confidentiality was adequate (69.25% of positive responses), and the perception of unauthorized information exchange and physical means to safeguard privacy were less good (55 and 55.9% of positive responses).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The management of confidentiality in the emergency department of our hospital has a large room for improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36921,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Clinica Practica","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100510"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valoración de la importancia de la confidencialidad y del manejo adecuado de la historia clínica en el servicio de urgencias hospitalarias\",\"authors\":\"Amparo Ruiz Carbonell ,&nbsp;Florencia Laffont Oscoz ,&nbsp;Begoña Navarro Lluesma ,&nbsp;Alexander Sammel ,&nbsp;Ginés Gómez Úbeda ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel García García\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mcpsp.2025.100510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Healthcare professionals sometimes forget their obligations regarding professional secrecy and confidentiality. Violating them is punishable by law. We carried out a study to evaluate the degree of knowledge about the use of secrecy and confidentiality of patients' medical information in the care practice of the professionals of the Hospital Emergency Service of a second level hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous survey was designed with questions about daily activity in the Emergency Department related to confidentiality. They tried to evaluate, by all the professional groups involved in the care of patients in the Emergency Department, 4 aspects: the degree of workers' perception of confidentiality; knowledge in confidentiality and the desire to obtain that knowledge; the perception of unauthorized exchange or search for information; and the perception of physical means to safeguard privacy. The statistical tests chi-square, t-Student and ANOVA were used, with a level of statistical significance of <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>100 workers from all professional groups responded to the survey. Knowledge of confidentiality was adequate (69.25% of positive responses), and the perception of unauthorized information exchange and physical means to safeguard privacy were less good (55 and 55.9% of positive responses).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The management of confidentiality in the emergency department of our hospital has a large room for improvement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Clinica Practica\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Clinica Practica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924925000205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Clinica Practica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924925000205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健专业人员有时会忘记他们对职业保密和保密的义务。违反这些规定将受到法律的惩罚。我们开展了一项研究,以评估在护理实践中使用保密和病人的医疗信息保密专业人员的知识程度。方法设计了一项匿名调查,问卷内容涉及急诊科与保密相关的日常活动。他们试图评估,由所有专业团体参与护理的病人在急诊科,4个方面:工作人员的保密程度的感知;保密知识和获取该知识的愿望;未经授权交换或搜索信息的行为;而感知物理意味着保护隐私。统计学检验采用卡方检验、t-Student检验和方差分析,p <; 0.05。结果来自各行各业的100名员工参与了调查。对保密的了解是足够的(69.25%的积极回应),对未经授权的信息交换和保护隐私的物理手段的感知不太好(55%和55.9%的积极回应)。结论我院急诊科的保密管理工作有很大的改进空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Valoración de la importancia de la confidencialidad y del manejo adecuado de la historia clínica en el servicio de urgencias hospitalarias

Objective

Healthcare professionals sometimes forget their obligations regarding professional secrecy and confidentiality. Violating them is punishable by law. We carried out a study to evaluate the degree of knowledge about the use of secrecy and confidentiality of patients' medical information in the care practice of the professionals of the Hospital Emergency Service of a second level hospital.

Methods

An anonymous survey was designed with questions about daily activity in the Emergency Department related to confidentiality. They tried to evaluate, by all the professional groups involved in the care of patients in the Emergency Department, 4 aspects: the degree of workers' perception of confidentiality; knowledge in confidentiality and the desire to obtain that knowledge; the perception of unauthorized exchange or search for information; and the perception of physical means to safeguard privacy. The statistical tests chi-square, t-Student and ANOVA were used, with a level of statistical significance of p < 0.05.

Results

100 workers from all professional groups responded to the survey. Knowledge of confidentiality was adequate (69.25% of positive responses), and the perception of unauthorized information exchange and physical means to safeguard privacy were less good (55 and 55.9% of positive responses).

Conclusions

The management of confidentiality in the emergency department of our hospital has a large room for improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Clinica Practica
Medicina Clinica Practica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
43 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信