{"title":"知识扩散:为增长和不平等重新优化再分配","authors":"Debasis Bandyopadhyay , Yan Liang , Xueli Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the effects of income redistribution on output and welfare by generalizing Bénabou’s (2022) economy to incorporate two new elements: physical capital and social knowledge externalities. Income inequality, sustained by unequal privileges to private education and parental networking in the absence of a credit market, interacts with these added features. These interactions theoretically link four seemingly unrelated global trends: increased capital share in production due to automation, rising income inequality, slower knowledge diffusion, and declining productivity growth, offering new insights into growth- and welfare-enhancing redistributive policies. Automation, reflected in the growing importance of physical capital in production, and capital-ownership concentration worsen unequal educational opportunities and, in turn, income inequality, which slows productivity growth through two underexplored channels. First, we provide empirical support for the idea that higher inequality hampers knowledge diffusion to lower the economy’s social knowledge stock, thereby hindering children’s learning from the existing know-how through the knowledge externality channel. Second, greater heterogeneity in knowledge absorption due to more unequal access to education reduces average human capital accumulation because of diminishing returns to investment. Progressive redistribution helps counteract these adverse effects, pushing the economy’s productivity frontier outward, especially for countries with lower social cohesion, going beyond Bénabou’s (2022) finding of reduced resource misallocation. Optimal redistribution balances these benefits against potential distortions to labor supply and savings. Simulations using OECD data show sizable gains in output, aggregate efficiency (as defined in Bénabou, 2022), and welfare from moving towards optimal redistributive rates, though with varying effects across countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusing knowledge: Reoptimizing redistribution for growth and inequality\",\"authors\":\"Debasis Bandyopadhyay , Yan Liang , Xueli Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We examine the effects of income redistribution on output and welfare by generalizing Bénabou’s (2022) economy to incorporate two new elements: physical capital and social knowledge externalities. Income inequality, sustained by unequal privileges to private education and parental networking in the absence of a credit market, interacts with these added features. These interactions theoretically link four seemingly unrelated global trends: increased capital share in production due to automation, rising income inequality, slower knowledge diffusion, and declining productivity growth, offering new insights into growth- and welfare-enhancing redistributive policies. Automation, reflected in the growing importance of physical capital in production, and capital-ownership concentration worsen unequal educational opportunities and, in turn, income inequality, which slows productivity growth through two underexplored channels. First, we provide empirical support for the idea that higher inequality hampers knowledge diffusion to lower the economy’s social knowledge stock, thereby hindering children’s learning from the existing know-how through the knowledge externality channel. Second, greater heterogeneity in knowledge absorption due to more unequal access to education reduces average human capital accumulation because of diminishing returns to investment. Progressive redistribution helps counteract these adverse effects, pushing the economy’s productivity frontier outward, especially for countries with lower social cohesion, going beyond Bénabou’s (2022) finding of reduced resource misallocation. Optimal redistribution balances these benefits against potential distortions to labor supply and savings. Simulations using OECD data show sizable gains in output, aggregate efficiency (as defined in Bénabou, 2022), and welfare from moving towards optimal redistributive rates, though with varying effects across countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292125001461\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292125001461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diffusing knowledge: Reoptimizing redistribution for growth and inequality
We examine the effects of income redistribution on output and welfare by generalizing Bénabou’s (2022) economy to incorporate two new elements: physical capital and social knowledge externalities. Income inequality, sustained by unequal privileges to private education and parental networking in the absence of a credit market, interacts with these added features. These interactions theoretically link four seemingly unrelated global trends: increased capital share in production due to automation, rising income inequality, slower knowledge diffusion, and declining productivity growth, offering new insights into growth- and welfare-enhancing redistributive policies. Automation, reflected in the growing importance of physical capital in production, and capital-ownership concentration worsen unequal educational opportunities and, in turn, income inequality, which slows productivity growth through two underexplored channels. First, we provide empirical support for the idea that higher inequality hampers knowledge diffusion to lower the economy’s social knowledge stock, thereby hindering children’s learning from the existing know-how through the knowledge externality channel. Second, greater heterogeneity in knowledge absorption due to more unequal access to education reduces average human capital accumulation because of diminishing returns to investment. Progressive redistribution helps counteract these adverse effects, pushing the economy’s productivity frontier outward, especially for countries with lower social cohesion, going beyond Bénabou’s (2022) finding of reduced resource misallocation. Optimal redistribution balances these benefits against potential distortions to labor supply and savings. Simulations using OECD data show sizable gains in output, aggregate efficiency (as defined in Bénabou, 2022), and welfare from moving towards optimal redistributive rates, though with varying effects across countries.
期刊介绍:
The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.