知识扩散:为增长和不平等重新优化再分配

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Debasis Bandyopadhyay , Yan Liang , Xueli Tang
{"title":"知识扩散:为增长和不平等重新优化再分配","authors":"Debasis Bandyopadhyay ,&nbsp;Yan Liang ,&nbsp;Xueli Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the effects of income redistribution on output and welfare by generalizing Bénabou’s (2022) economy to incorporate two new elements: physical capital and social knowledge externalities. Income inequality, sustained by unequal privileges to private education and parental networking in the absence of a credit market, interacts with these added features. These interactions theoretically link four seemingly unrelated global trends: increased capital share in production due to automation, rising income inequality, slower knowledge diffusion, and declining productivity growth, offering new insights into growth- and welfare-enhancing redistributive policies. Automation, reflected in the growing importance of physical capital in production, and capital-ownership concentration worsen unequal educational opportunities and, in turn, income inequality, which slows productivity growth through two underexplored channels. First, we provide empirical support for the idea that higher inequality hampers knowledge diffusion to lower the economy’s social knowledge stock, thereby hindering children’s learning from the existing know-how through the knowledge externality channel. Second, greater heterogeneity in knowledge absorption due to more unequal access to education reduces average human capital accumulation because of diminishing returns to investment. Progressive redistribution helps counteract these adverse effects, pushing the economy’s productivity frontier outward, especially for countries with lower social cohesion, going beyond Bénabou’s (2022) finding of reduced resource misallocation. Optimal redistribution balances these benefits against potential distortions to labor supply and savings. Simulations using OECD data show sizable gains in output, aggregate efficiency (as defined in Bénabou, 2022), and welfare from moving towards optimal redistributive rates, though with varying effects across countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusing knowledge: Reoptimizing redistribution for growth and inequality\",\"authors\":\"Debasis Bandyopadhyay ,&nbsp;Yan Liang ,&nbsp;Xueli Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We examine the effects of income redistribution on output and welfare by generalizing Bénabou’s (2022) economy to incorporate two new elements: physical capital and social knowledge externalities. Income inequality, sustained by unequal privileges to private education and parental networking in the absence of a credit market, interacts with these added features. These interactions theoretically link four seemingly unrelated global trends: increased capital share in production due to automation, rising income inequality, slower knowledge diffusion, and declining productivity growth, offering new insights into growth- and welfare-enhancing redistributive policies. Automation, reflected in the growing importance of physical capital in production, and capital-ownership concentration worsen unequal educational opportunities and, in turn, income inequality, which slows productivity growth through two underexplored channels. First, we provide empirical support for the idea that higher inequality hampers knowledge diffusion to lower the economy’s social knowledge stock, thereby hindering children’s learning from the existing know-how through the knowledge externality channel. Second, greater heterogeneity in knowledge absorption due to more unequal access to education reduces average human capital accumulation because of diminishing returns to investment. Progressive redistribution helps counteract these adverse effects, pushing the economy’s productivity frontier outward, especially for countries with lower social cohesion, going beyond Bénabou’s (2022) finding of reduced resource misallocation. Optimal redistribution balances these benefits against potential distortions to labor supply and savings. Simulations using OECD data show sizable gains in output, aggregate efficiency (as defined in Bénabou, 2022), and welfare from moving towards optimal redistributive rates, though with varying effects across countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292125001461\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292125001461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过推广b纳布(2022)经济,纳入两个新的要素:物质资本和社会知识外部性,来检验收入再分配对产出和福利的影响。在没有信贷市场的情况下,私人教育和父母网络的不平等特权维持了收入不平等,这与这些附加特征相互作用。从理论上讲,这些相互作用将四种看似无关的全球趋势联系在一起:自动化导致生产中的资本份额增加、收入不平等加剧、知识扩散放缓以及生产率增长下降,为促进增长和福利的再分配政策提供了新的见解。自动化反映在物质资本在生产中日益重要的地位上,资本所有权集中加剧了教育机会的不平等,进而加剧了收入不平等,从而通过两个未充分开发的渠道减缓了生产率的增长。首先,我们为更高的不平等阻碍知识扩散从而降低经济体的社会知识存量,从而阻碍儿童通过知识外部性渠道从现有知识中学习的观点提供了实证支持。其次,由于受教育机会的不平等,知识吸收的异质性更大,这降低了平均人力资本积累,因为投资回报递减。渐进式再分配有助于抵消这些不利影响,将经济的生产力边界向外推,特别是对于社会凝聚力较低的国家,这超出了b纳布(2022)关于减少资源错配的发现。最优再分配平衡了这些利益与劳动力供给和储蓄的潜在扭曲。利用经合组织数据进行的模拟显示,通过向最优再分配率发展,在产出、总效率(如bassanabou, 2022年所定义)和福利方面都有可观的收益,尽管各国的影响各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diffusing knowledge: Reoptimizing redistribution for growth and inequality
We examine the effects of income redistribution on output and welfare by generalizing Bénabou’s (2022) economy to incorporate two new elements: physical capital and social knowledge externalities. Income inequality, sustained by unequal privileges to private education and parental networking in the absence of a credit market, interacts with these added features. These interactions theoretically link four seemingly unrelated global trends: increased capital share in production due to automation, rising income inequality, slower knowledge diffusion, and declining productivity growth, offering new insights into growth- and welfare-enhancing redistributive policies. Automation, reflected in the growing importance of physical capital in production, and capital-ownership concentration worsen unequal educational opportunities and, in turn, income inequality, which slows productivity growth through two underexplored channels. First, we provide empirical support for the idea that higher inequality hampers knowledge diffusion to lower the economy’s social knowledge stock, thereby hindering children’s learning from the existing know-how through the knowledge externality channel. Second, greater heterogeneity in knowledge absorption due to more unequal access to education reduces average human capital accumulation because of diminishing returns to investment. Progressive redistribution helps counteract these adverse effects, pushing the economy’s productivity frontier outward, especially for countries with lower social cohesion, going beyond Bénabou’s (2022) finding of reduced resource misallocation. Optimal redistribution balances these benefits against potential distortions to labor supply and savings. Simulations using OECD data show sizable gains in output, aggregate efficiency (as defined in Bénabou, 2022), and welfare from moving towards optimal redistributive rates, though with varying effects across countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信