衡量民主党和共和党人的阴谋信念:四种短形式阴谋思想量表测量不变性的检验

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Cameron S. Kay, Joshua Hart
{"title":"衡量民主党和共和党人的阴谋信念:四种短形式阴谋思想量表测量不变性的检验","authors":"Cameron S. Kay,&nbsp;Joshua Hart","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Are Republicans more likely to believe in conspiracy theories than Democrats? This question has received considerable attention among researchers, but answering it requires measures of conspiracist belief that function the same among Democrats and Republicans. Unfortunately, evidence of such <em>measurement invariance</em> is scarce. To address this limitation, the current preregistered study (<em>n</em><sub>Democrats</sub> = 351; <em>n</em><sub>Republicans</sub> = 339) tested the invariance of four short-form conspiracist ideation measures—the <em>General Measure of Conspiracism</em> (GMC), the <em>Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale – 5</em> (GCB-5), <em>the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire</em> (CMQ), and the <em>American Conspiracy Thinking Scale</em> (ACTS)—across the two major US political parties. Given the lack of prior research on the topic, we preregistered the optimistic hypothesis that all four scales would achieve the highest level of invariance (i.e., strict factorial invariance). The GMC was the only measure to reach this level. The GCB-5, CMQ, and ACTS, by contrast, only achieved the third-highest level (i.e., metric invariance), despite the GCB-5 demonstrating the greatest overall fit of the measures tested. Researchers who are interested in comparing levels of conspiracist ideation between Democrats and Republicans may, therefore, be best served by using the GMC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 113365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring conspiracy beliefs among Democrats and Republicans: A test of the measurement invariance of four short-form conspiracist ideation scales\",\"authors\":\"Cameron S. Kay,&nbsp;Joshua Hart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Are Republicans more likely to believe in conspiracy theories than Democrats? This question has received considerable attention among researchers, but answering it requires measures of conspiracist belief that function the same among Democrats and Republicans. Unfortunately, evidence of such <em>measurement invariance</em> is scarce. To address this limitation, the current preregistered study (<em>n</em><sub>Democrats</sub> = 351; <em>n</em><sub>Republicans</sub> = 339) tested the invariance of four short-form conspiracist ideation measures—the <em>General Measure of Conspiracism</em> (GMC), the <em>Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale – 5</em> (GCB-5), <em>the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire</em> (CMQ), and the <em>American Conspiracy Thinking Scale</em> (ACTS)—across the two major US political parties. Given the lack of prior research on the topic, we preregistered the optimistic hypothesis that all four scales would achieve the highest level of invariance (i.e., strict factorial invariance). The GMC was the only measure to reach this level. The GCB-5, CMQ, and ACTS, by contrast, only achieved the third-highest level (i.e., metric invariance), despite the GCB-5 demonstrating the greatest overall fit of the measures tested. Researchers who are interested in comparing levels of conspiracist ideation between Democrats and Republicans may, therefore, be best served by using the GMC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"246 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003277\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共和党人比民主党人更容易相信阴谋论吗?这个问题在研究人员中引起了相当大的关注,但要回答这个问题,需要对阴谋论的信念进行衡量,而这种信念在民主党人和共和党人之间的作用是一样的。不幸的是,这种测量不变性的证据很少。为了解决这一限制,目前的预注册研究(nDemocrats = 351;nRepublicans = 339)测试了四种简短的阴谋论思想测量方法的不变性-一般阴谋论测量(GMC),一般阴谋论信念量表-5 (GCB-5),阴谋心态问卷(CMQ)和美国阴谋思维量表(ACTS) -在美国两个主要政党中。鉴于缺乏对该主题的先前研究,我们预先注册了乐观的假设,即所有四个量表都将达到最高水平的不变性(即严格的因子不变性)。GMC是唯一达到这一水平的指标。相比之下,GCB-5、CMQ和ACTS仅达到了第三高的水平(即度量不变性),尽管GCB-5展示了所测试的测量的最大整体拟合。因此,对比较民主党人和共和党人的阴谋论思想水平感兴趣的研究人员可能最好使用GMC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring conspiracy beliefs among Democrats and Republicans: A test of the measurement invariance of four short-form conspiracist ideation scales
Are Republicans more likely to believe in conspiracy theories than Democrats? This question has received considerable attention among researchers, but answering it requires measures of conspiracist belief that function the same among Democrats and Republicans. Unfortunately, evidence of such measurement invariance is scarce. To address this limitation, the current preregistered study (nDemocrats = 351; nRepublicans = 339) tested the invariance of four short-form conspiracist ideation measures—the General Measure of Conspiracism (GMC), the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale – 5 (GCB-5), the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ), and the American Conspiracy Thinking Scale (ACTS)—across the two major US political parties. Given the lack of prior research on the topic, we preregistered the optimistic hypothesis that all four scales would achieve the highest level of invariance (i.e., strict factorial invariance). The GMC was the only measure to reach this level. The GCB-5, CMQ, and ACTS, by contrast, only achieved the third-highest level (i.e., metric invariance), despite the GCB-5 demonstrating the greatest overall fit of the measures tested. Researchers who are interested in comparing levels of conspiracist ideation between Democrats and Republicans may, therefore, be best served by using the GMC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信