{"title":"靠近活动断裂带的高面板堆石坝地震边坡破坏可靠度评估","authors":"Ugur Safak Cavus , Murat Kilit","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assesses the earthquake-induced failure risks of the upstream and downstream slopes of a concrete face dam (CFRD), which is under the influence of a nearby active fault, using the reliability-based analysis method. For this purpose, peak ground accelerations (PGAs) that may occur at the dam site were calculated probabilistically and their contribution to the sliding risks of dam slopes was determined in accordance with the conditional probability theorem. Upstream and downstream slopes of CFRDs are usually conventionally designed as 1.3–1.5H:1V and 1.3–1.6H:1V, respectively throughout the world. Such slope design is considered sufficient for almost every case. The findings of this study are fully applicable and very important for the structural design of all concrete-faced rockfill dams (CFRDs) worldwide. Since, the slope design of CFRDs is similar and usually traditionally (1.3–1.5H; 1V for upstream slope and 1.4–1.6H:1V for downstream slope). However, this study proves that only conventional upstream slope design (1.3–1.5H:1V) can be safe for even very high peak ground accelerations (PGAs) occurring due to a nearby active fault, but contrary to expectations, downstream slope of CFRDs cannot be sufficiently safe and maintain its slope sliding safety when PGAs reach high levels. When the critical PGA level is exceeded, the downstream slope carries the risk of losing its stability with high probability, as emphasized in this study. Therefore, this study provides a new design strategy and extremely important information for dam design engineers which is to design a rather flatter downstream slope such as 1 vertical to 1.8–2.0 horizontal or, instead, to design a downstream rockfill berm supporting conventional design if CFRDs are to be built in high seismic hazard potential areas or close to active faults. Suggested such type of designs will be economical and sufficiently safe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"65 4","pages":"Article 101653"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability based seismic slope failure assessment of a high concrete face rockfill dam close to an active fault zone\",\"authors\":\"Ugur Safak Cavus , Murat Kilit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study assesses the earthquake-induced failure risks of the upstream and downstream slopes of a concrete face dam (CFRD), which is under the influence of a nearby active fault, using the reliability-based analysis method. For this purpose, peak ground accelerations (PGAs) that may occur at the dam site were calculated probabilistically and their contribution to the sliding risks of dam slopes was determined in accordance with the conditional probability theorem. Upstream and downstream slopes of CFRDs are usually conventionally designed as 1.3–1.5H:1V and 1.3–1.6H:1V, respectively throughout the world. Such slope design is considered sufficient for almost every case. The findings of this study are fully applicable and very important for the structural design of all concrete-faced rockfill dams (CFRDs) worldwide. Since, the slope design of CFRDs is similar and usually traditionally (1.3–1.5H; 1V for upstream slope and 1.4–1.6H:1V for downstream slope). However, this study proves that only conventional upstream slope design (1.3–1.5H:1V) can be safe for even very high peak ground accelerations (PGAs) occurring due to a nearby active fault, but contrary to expectations, downstream slope of CFRDs cannot be sufficiently safe and maintain its slope sliding safety when PGAs reach high levels. When the critical PGA level is exceeded, the downstream slope carries the risk of losing its stability with high probability, as emphasized in this study. Therefore, this study provides a new design strategy and extremely important information for dam design engineers which is to design a rather flatter downstream slope such as 1 vertical to 1.8–2.0 horizontal or, instead, to design a downstream rockfill berm supporting conventional design if CFRDs are to be built in high seismic hazard potential areas or close to active faults. Suggested such type of designs will be economical and sufficiently safe.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":\"65 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080625000873\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080625000873","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability based seismic slope failure assessment of a high concrete face rockfill dam close to an active fault zone
This study assesses the earthquake-induced failure risks of the upstream and downstream slopes of a concrete face dam (CFRD), which is under the influence of a nearby active fault, using the reliability-based analysis method. For this purpose, peak ground accelerations (PGAs) that may occur at the dam site were calculated probabilistically and their contribution to the sliding risks of dam slopes was determined in accordance with the conditional probability theorem. Upstream and downstream slopes of CFRDs are usually conventionally designed as 1.3–1.5H:1V and 1.3–1.6H:1V, respectively throughout the world. Such slope design is considered sufficient for almost every case. The findings of this study are fully applicable and very important for the structural design of all concrete-faced rockfill dams (CFRDs) worldwide. Since, the slope design of CFRDs is similar and usually traditionally (1.3–1.5H; 1V for upstream slope and 1.4–1.6H:1V for downstream slope). However, this study proves that only conventional upstream slope design (1.3–1.5H:1V) can be safe for even very high peak ground accelerations (PGAs) occurring due to a nearby active fault, but contrary to expectations, downstream slope of CFRDs cannot be sufficiently safe and maintain its slope sliding safety when PGAs reach high levels. When the critical PGA level is exceeded, the downstream slope carries the risk of losing its stability with high probability, as emphasized in this study. Therefore, this study provides a new design strategy and extremely important information for dam design engineers which is to design a rather flatter downstream slope such as 1 vertical to 1.8–2.0 horizontal or, instead, to design a downstream rockfill berm supporting conventional design if CFRDs are to be built in high seismic hazard potential areas or close to active faults. Suggested such type of designs will be economical and sufficiently safe.
期刊介绍:
Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020.
Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.