文化谦逊的汇报©与珍珠的比较：一项随机对照试验

IF 2.5 3区医学 Q1 NURSING

Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101779

Cynthia Foronda PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF, FAAN, Kenya Snowden DNP, APRN, ACNP-BC, FNP-C, Nichole Crenshaw DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC, ANP-BC, CHSE, FAANP, LaToya Lewis Ed.D-CI, MSN, RN, Brenda Owusu DNP, APRN, ANP-BC, FNP-BC, Karina A. Gattamorta PhD, EdS, Michelle Arrojo DNP, APRN, FNP-BC, ENP-C, PMHNP-BC, CHSE, Amauri Quintana DNP, APRN, AGPCNP-C, FNP-BC, PMHNP-BC, CHSE, Andrew Porter PhD

{"title":"文化谦逊的汇报©与珍珠的比较：一项随机对照试验","authors":"Cynthia Foronda PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF, FAAN, Kenya Snowden DNP, APRN, ACNP-BC, FNP-C, Nichole Crenshaw DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC, ANP-BC, CHSE, FAANP, LaToya Lewis Ed.D-CI, MSN, RN, Brenda Owusu DNP, APRN, ANP-BC, FNP-BC, Karina A. Gattamorta PhD, EdS, Michelle Arrojo DNP, APRN, FNP-BC, ENP-C, PMHNP-BC, CHSE, Amauri Quintana DNP, APRN, AGPCNP-C, FNP-BC, PMHNP-BC, CHSE, Andrew Porter PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health professions educators face new challenges to prepare learners to provide ethical and empathic care to patients of varied races and ethnicities with differing personal beliefs and values. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare the effectiveness of <em>Debriefing for Cultural Humility</em> with a traditional method (PEARLS) after care of a patient of color to teach students about cultural humility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employed a single-site, randomized controlled trial design with 52 nurse practitioner students over two to three months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Debriefing effectiveness did not differ based on method of debriefing <em>(p</em> = .409). Cultural humility scores significantly improved over time (<em>p</em> = .023) with an increase in scores from baseline to post-implementation across both debriefing groups. The main effect of the debriefing method was not significant, indicating that both debriefing methods led to comparable learning outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Debriefing for Cultural Humility and PEARLS are effective debriefing methods to promote the discussion and learning of challenging concepts, including diversity, equity, and racism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Debriefing for Cultural Humility© to PEARLS: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Foronda PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF, FAAN, Kenya Snowden DNP, APRN, ACNP-BC, FNP-C, Nichole Crenshaw DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC, ANP-BC, CHSE, FAANP, LaToya Lewis Ed.D-CI, MSN, RN, Brenda Owusu DNP, APRN, ANP-BC, FNP-BC, Karina A. Gattamorta PhD, EdS, Michelle Arrojo DNP, APRN, FNP-BC, ENP-C, PMHNP-BC, CHSE, Amauri Quintana DNP, APRN, AGPCNP-C, FNP-BC, PMHNP-BC, CHSE, Andrew Porter PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health professions educators face new challenges to prepare learners to provide ethical and empathic care to patients of varied races and ethnicities with differing personal beliefs and values. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare the effectiveness of <em>Debriefing for Cultural Humility</em> with a traditional method (PEARLS) after care of a patient of color to teach students about cultural humility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employed a single-site, randomized controlled trial design with 52 nurse practitioner students over two to three months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Debriefing effectiveness did not differ based on method of debriefing <em>(p</em> = .409). Cultural humility scores significantly improved over time (<em>p</em> = .023) with an increase in scores from baseline to post-implementation across both debriefing groups. The main effect of the debriefing method was not significant, indicating that both debriefing methods led to comparable learning outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Debriefing for Cultural Humility and PEARLS are effective debriefing methods to promote the discussion and learning of challenging concepts, including diversity, equity, and racism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101779\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000969\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000969","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生专业教育工作者面临着新的挑战，准备学习者为不同种族和民族的患者提供道德和移情护理，这些患者具有不同的个人信仰和价值观。本随机对照试验（RCT）的目的是比较在照顾一位有色人种患者后，文化谦逊汇报与传统方法（PEARLS）的有效性，以教导学生文化谦逊。方法采用单点、随机对照试验设计，对52名实习护生进行为期2 ~ 3个月的研究。结果不同的述职方式对述职效果无显著影响（p = .409）。随着时间的推移，文化谦逊得分显著提高（p = 0.023），两个汇报组的得分从基线到实施后都有所增加。汇报方法的主效应不显著，表明两种汇报方法的学习效果相当。文化谦逊的汇报和珍珠是有效的汇报方法，可以促进对具有挑战性的概念的讨论和学习，包括多样性、公平和种族主义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of Debriefing for Cultural Humility© to PEARLS: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Health professions educators face new challenges to prepare learners to provide ethical and empathic care to patients of varied races and ethnicities with differing personal beliefs and values. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare the effectiveness of Debriefing for Cultural Humility with a traditional method (PEARLS) after care of a patient of color to teach students about cultural humility.

Methods

This study employed a single-site, randomized controlled trial design with 52 nurse practitioner students over two to three months.

Results

Debriefing effectiveness did not differ based on method of debriefing (p = .409). Cultural humility scores significantly improved over time (p = .023) with an increase in scores from baseline to post-implementation across both debriefing groups. The main effect of the debriefing method was not significant, indicating that both debriefing methods led to comparable learning outcomes.

Conclusion

Debriefing for Cultural Humility and PEARLS are effective debriefing methods to promote the discussion and learning of challenging concepts, including diversity, equity, and racism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Simulation in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

15.40%

发文量

107

期刊介绍： Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.