内隐偏见训练对模拟参与者的有效性

IF 2.5 3区医学 Q1 NURSING

Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101781

Richard V. Thompson PhD, MDiv, RBCC, Jeff Barbee DMA, Nick Stancato, Sheryl Pfeil MD

{"title":"内隐偏见训练对模拟参与者的有效性","authors":"Richard V. Thompson PhD, MDiv, RBCC, Jeff Barbee DMA, Nick Stancato, Sheryl Pfeil MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simulated Participants (SPs) are crucial in healthcare education, providing simulated patient encounters. However, SPs may unintentionally introduce implicit biases, affecting student assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study involved 69 SPs who completed pre- and post-surveys. The training program included classroom sessions, discussions, and case studies to raise awareness of biases and promote behavioral changes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistical analysis, including Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Odds Ratios, showed significant improvements in all measured variables post-training, with effect sizes (<em>r</em>) ranging from 0.26 to 0.55. The training increased SPs’ awareness of their biases and ability to take corrective actions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight the importance of targeted training programs to enhance medical simulations’ objectivity and educational value. Ongoing research is needed to generalize these results and explore additional strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of implicit bias training for simulated participants\",\"authors\":\"Richard V. Thompson PhD, MDiv, RBCC, Jeff Barbee DMA, Nick Stancato, Sheryl Pfeil MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simulated Participants (SPs) are crucial in healthcare education, providing simulated patient encounters. However, SPs may unintentionally introduce implicit biases, affecting student assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study involved 69 SPs who completed pre- and post-surveys. The training program included classroom sessions, discussions, and case studies to raise awareness of biases and promote behavioral changes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistical analysis, including Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Odds Ratios, showed significant improvements in all measured variables post-training, with effect sizes (<em>r</em>) ranging from 0.26 to 0.55. The training increased SPs’ awareness of their biases and ability to take corrective actions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight the importance of targeted training programs to enhance medical simulations’ objectivity and educational value. Ongoing research is needed to generalize these results and explore additional strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000982\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

模拟参与者（SPs）在医疗保健教育中至关重要，提供模拟的患者接触。然而，SPs可能无意中引入内隐偏见，影响学生的评估。方法对69名SPs进行问卷调查。培训计划包括课堂授课、讨论和案例研究，以提高对偏见的认识，促进行为改变。结果包括Wilcoxon符号秩检验和比值比在内的统计分析显示，训练后所有测量变量均有显著改善，效应量(r)范围为0.26至0.55。培训提高了SPs对自己偏见的认识和采取纠正措施的能力。结论有针对性的医学模拟培训对提高医学模拟的客观性和教育价值具有重要意义。需要持续的研究来推广这些结果并探索其他策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The effectiveness of implicit bias training for simulated participants

Background

Simulated Participants (SPs) are crucial in healthcare education, providing simulated patient encounters. However, SPs may unintentionally introduce implicit biases, affecting student assessments.

Methods

This study involved 69 SPs who completed pre- and post-surveys. The training program included classroom sessions, discussions, and case studies to raise awareness of biases and promote behavioral changes.

Results

Statistical analysis, including Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Odds Ratios, showed significant improvements in all measured variables post-training, with effect sizes (r) ranging from 0.26 to 0.55. The training increased SPs’ awareness of their biases and ability to take corrective actions.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the importance of targeted training programs to enhance medical simulations’ objectivity and educational value. Ongoing research is needed to generalize these results and explore additional strategies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Simulation in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

15.40%

发文量

107

期刊介绍： Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.