可再生能源发展的评价与障碍诊断:一个多层次框架及其在中国的应用

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yi Su, Jiahui Chai, Sichong Lu, Ao Lv
{"title":"可再生能源发展的评价与障碍诊断:一个多层次框架及其在中国的应用","authors":"Yi Su,&nbsp;Jiahui Chai,&nbsp;Sichong Lu,&nbsp;Ao Lv","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating renewable energy development (RED) is critical for countries pursuing Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) and climate targets. However, existing studies primarily focus on either national-level evaluations or isolated regional analyses, overlooking multi-level evaluations that simultaneously examine both national and sub-national levels along with systematic obstacle diagnostics that are essential for large, diverse countries with significant regional heterogeneity. To address these deficiencies, this study develops a multi-level framework applicable to countries with diverse regional characteristics. Initially, an evaluation indicator system is constructed based on sustainable development and technological innovation theories. Secondly, an incomplete data imputation algorithm and combined weights are proposed to tackle the challenges posed by incomplete indicator data during the evaluation process. Thirdly, an improved technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) model is employed to evaluate the temporal evolution, development comparison, and spatial distribution of RED at multiple administrative levels, with an obstacle degree model applied to diagnose regional barriers. The framework is demonstrated through application to China’s national and provincial levels from 2016 to 2020. Additionally, sensitivity analysis confirms the applicability and flexibility of the proposed method across different parameter settings. The findings reveal temporal patterns of initial growth followed by decline, significant regional heterogeneity in development trajectories across administrative units, and technological obstacles as common challenges across diverse regions. The framework provides valuable implications for various stakeholders, including policymakers, energy planners, and industry practitioners, supporting the advancement of RED in countries with complex multi-level governance structures pursuing SDG 7 goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 116029"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and obstacle diagnosis to renewable energy development: A multi-level framework with application to China\",\"authors\":\"Yi Su,&nbsp;Jiahui Chai,&nbsp;Sichong Lu,&nbsp;Ao Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Evaluating renewable energy development (RED) is critical for countries pursuing Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) and climate targets. However, existing studies primarily focus on either national-level evaluations or isolated regional analyses, overlooking multi-level evaluations that simultaneously examine both national and sub-national levels along with systematic obstacle diagnostics that are essential for large, diverse countries with significant regional heterogeneity. To address these deficiencies, this study develops a multi-level framework applicable to countries with diverse regional characteristics. Initially, an evaluation indicator system is constructed based on sustainable development and technological innovation theories. Secondly, an incomplete data imputation algorithm and combined weights are proposed to tackle the challenges posed by incomplete indicator data during the evaluation process. Thirdly, an improved technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) model is employed to evaluate the temporal evolution, development comparison, and spatial distribution of RED at multiple administrative levels, with an obstacle degree model applied to diagnose regional barriers. The framework is demonstrated through application to China’s national and provincial levels from 2016 to 2020. Additionally, sensitivity analysis confirms the applicability and flexibility of the proposed method across different parameter settings. The findings reveal temporal patterns of initial growth followed by decline, significant regional heterogeneity in development trajectories across administrative units, and technological obstacles as common challenges across diverse regions. The framework provides valuable implications for various stakeholders, including policymakers, energy planners, and industry practitioners, supporting the advancement of RED in countries with complex multi-level governance structures pursuing SDG 7 goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125007026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125007026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估可再生能源发展(RED)对于各国实现可持续发展目标7和气候目标至关重要。然而,现有的研究主要集中在国家层面的评估或孤立的区域分析,忽视了同时检查国家和次国家层面的多层次评估,以及系统的障碍诊断,这对于具有显著区域异质性的大而多样的国家至关重要。为了解决这些不足,本研究开发了一个适用于具有不同区域特征的国家的多层次框架。首先,基于可持续发展理论和技术创新理论构建了评价指标体系。其次,针对评价过程中指标数据不完整带来的挑战,提出了一种不完全数据输入算法和组合权重;第三,采用改进的TOPSIS (order preference by similarity to ideal solution)模型对RED在多个行政级别上的时间演化、发展比较和空间分布进行了评价,并采用障碍度模型对区域障碍进行了诊断。通过2016年至2020年在中国国家和省级层面的应用,对该框架进行了论证。此外,灵敏度分析证实了该方法在不同参数设置下的适用性和灵活性。研究结果揭示了最初增长后下降的时间模式,各行政单位发展轨迹的显著区域异质性,以及不同区域面临的共同挑战——技术障碍。该框架为包括政策制定者、能源规划者和行业从业者在内的各种利益相关者提供了宝贵的启示,支持在具有复杂多层次治理结构的国家推进RED,以实现可持续发展目标7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and obstacle diagnosis to renewable energy development: A multi-level framework with application to China
Evaluating renewable energy development (RED) is critical for countries pursuing Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) and climate targets. However, existing studies primarily focus on either national-level evaluations or isolated regional analyses, overlooking multi-level evaluations that simultaneously examine both national and sub-national levels along with systematic obstacle diagnostics that are essential for large, diverse countries with significant regional heterogeneity. To address these deficiencies, this study develops a multi-level framework applicable to countries with diverse regional characteristics. Initially, an evaluation indicator system is constructed based on sustainable development and technological innovation theories. Secondly, an incomplete data imputation algorithm and combined weights are proposed to tackle the challenges posed by incomplete indicator data during the evaluation process. Thirdly, an improved technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) model is employed to evaluate the temporal evolution, development comparison, and spatial distribution of RED at multiple administrative levels, with an obstacle degree model applied to diagnose regional barriers. The framework is demonstrated through application to China’s national and provincial levels from 2016 to 2020. Additionally, sensitivity analysis confirms the applicability and flexibility of the proposed method across different parameter settings. The findings reveal temporal patterns of initial growth followed by decline, significant regional heterogeneity in development trajectories across administrative units, and technological obstacles as common challenges across diverse regions. The framework provides valuable implications for various stakeholders, including policymakers, energy planners, and industry practitioners, supporting the advancement of RED in countries with complex multi-level governance structures pursuing SDG 7 goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信