行人分组对地下水淹楼梯疏散效率影响的三维数值评估

IF 2.6 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Carlos H. Aparicio Uribe , Beniamino Russo , Jackson Téllez-Álvarez , Eduardo Martínez-Gomariz
{"title":"行人分组对地下水淹楼梯疏散效率影响的三维数值评估","authors":"Carlos H. Aparicio Uribe ,&nbsp;Beniamino Russo ,&nbsp;Jackson Téllez-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Eduardo Martínez-Gomariz","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban floods increasingly threaten underground spaces and their users. Often essential for evacuation, stairs pose unique challenges as they also serve as the main path for the incoming water. While prior studies typically examine individual behaviour, the role of groups on flooded stairs remains underexplored. This study addresses that gap through a 3D numerical analysis evaluating how different pedestrian arrangements affect evacuation efficiency and safety. Using realistic human body dummies on real-scale stairs under a water discharge of 0.423 m<sup>3</sup>/s, the analysis calculates hydrodynamic forces alongside Momentum of Flow <em>M</em><sub><em>F</em></sub> and Specific Force Per Unit Width (SFPUW) <em>M</em><sub><em>0</em></sub> to assess hazardous conditions. Scenarios include individuals alone, in tandem, and side-by-side. Results show that group configurations significantly influence water-dragging forces. Side-by-side arrangements increased the force on both neighbouring and downstream pedestrians, while tandem formations reduced drag on trailing individuals. Greater separation distances between individuals reduced force influences. These findings reveal how group positioning affects safety during evacuation and highlight potential bottlenecks. The study offers valuable insights for improving evacuation strategies and safety protocols in underground infrastructure during floods, ultimately contributing to urban resilience and effective flood risk mitigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of pedestrian grouping on evacuation efficiency in underground flooded stairs: a 3D numerical assessment\",\"authors\":\"Carlos H. Aparicio Uribe ,&nbsp;Beniamino Russo ,&nbsp;Jackson Téllez-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Eduardo Martínez-Gomariz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban floods increasingly threaten underground spaces and their users. Often essential for evacuation, stairs pose unique challenges as they also serve as the main path for the incoming water. While prior studies typically examine individual behaviour, the role of groups on flooded stairs remains underexplored. This study addresses that gap through a 3D numerical analysis evaluating how different pedestrian arrangements affect evacuation efficiency and safety. Using realistic human body dummies on real-scale stairs under a water discharge of 0.423 m<sup>3</sup>/s, the analysis calculates hydrodynamic forces alongside Momentum of Flow <em>M</em><sub><em>F</em></sub> and Specific Force Per Unit Width (SFPUW) <em>M</em><sub><em>0</em></sub> to assess hazardous conditions. Scenarios include individuals alone, in tandem, and side-by-side. Results show that group configurations significantly influence water-dragging forces. Side-by-side arrangements increased the force on both neighbouring and downstream pedestrians, while tandem formations reduced drag on trailing individuals. Greater separation distances between individuals reduced force influences. These findings reveal how group positioning affects safety during evacuation and highlight potential bottlenecks. The study offers valuable insights for improving evacuation strategies and safety protocols in underground infrastructure during floods, ultimately contributing to urban resilience and effective flood risk mitigation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Disaster Science\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Disaster Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061725000456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061725000456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市洪水日益威胁地下空间及其使用者。楼梯通常是疏散必不可少的,因为它们也是来水的主要通道,因此构成了独特的挑战。虽然先前的研究通常是研究个体行为,但群体在被水淹没的楼梯上的作用仍未得到充分探索。本研究通过三维数值分析来解决这一差距,评估不同的行人安排如何影响疏散效率和安全。在0.423 m3/s排量的真实楼梯上使用逼真的人体假人,分析计算流体动力以及流动动量MF和单位宽度比力(SFPUW) M0,以评估危险情况。场景包括单独、串联和并排。结果表明,组形对水拖力有显著影响。并排排列增加了对邻近和下游行人的作用力,而串联排列减少了对尾随个体的阻力。个体之间更大的分离距离减小了力的影响。这些发现揭示了群体定位如何影响疏散过程中的安全,并突出了潜在的瓶颈。该研究为改善洪水期间地下基础设施的疏散策略和安全协议提供了有价值的见解,最终有助于城市抵御能力和有效减轻洪水风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of pedestrian grouping on evacuation efficiency in underground flooded stairs: a 3D numerical assessment
Urban floods increasingly threaten underground spaces and their users. Often essential for evacuation, stairs pose unique challenges as they also serve as the main path for the incoming water. While prior studies typically examine individual behaviour, the role of groups on flooded stairs remains underexplored. This study addresses that gap through a 3D numerical analysis evaluating how different pedestrian arrangements affect evacuation efficiency and safety. Using realistic human body dummies on real-scale stairs under a water discharge of 0.423 m3/s, the analysis calculates hydrodynamic forces alongside Momentum of Flow MF and Specific Force Per Unit Width (SFPUW) M0 to assess hazardous conditions. Scenarios include individuals alone, in tandem, and side-by-side. Results show that group configurations significantly influence water-dragging forces. Side-by-side arrangements increased the force on both neighbouring and downstream pedestrians, while tandem formations reduced drag on trailing individuals. Greater separation distances between individuals reduced force influences. These findings reveal how group positioning affects safety during evacuation and highlight potential bottlenecks. The study offers valuable insights for improving evacuation strategies and safety protocols in underground infrastructure during floods, ultimately contributing to urban resilience and effective flood risk mitigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信