碱性电解槽技术建模及其在能源系统决策优化中的应用综述

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Chunjun Huang , José Luis Rueda Torres , Yi Zong , Shi You , Xin Jin
{"title":"碱性电解槽技术建模及其在能源系统决策优化中的应用综述","authors":"Chunjun Huang ,&nbsp;José Luis Rueda Torres ,&nbsp;Yi Zong ,&nbsp;Shi You ,&nbsp;Xin Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Power-to-hydrogen systems, particularly the most mature alkaline electrolyzers (AELs), are increasingly deployed in modern energy systems due to their pivotal role in green hydrogen production and decarbonization. Proper modeling is vital for optimizing AEL lifecycle decisions, including design, operation, and investment. Despite numerous proposed models, a review focusing on their applications in system-level decision-making (e.g., operation and planning) remains lacking. This paper bridges this gap by reviewing over 100 peer-reviewed articles to offer an in-depth overview of AEL models employed in system-level decision-making. Followed by clarifying modeling requirements across different levels of AEL system analysis, three types of AEL models are classified in system-level decision-making: linear electricity–hydrogen (LEHM), nonlinear electricity–hydrogen (NEHM), and integrated electricity-heat-hydrogen models (IEHHM). This classification is based on representing the AEL with different levels of multi-physics detail and energy conversion assumptions. LEHM assumes a constant electricity-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of typically about 60%–70%, while NEHM and IEHHM allow modeling of dynamic efficiency variations in the typical range of 60%–80%, where the IEHHM uniquely integrates thermal dynamics. Their modeling principles, characteristics, strengths, and limitations are systematically reviewed, followed by an in-depth overview of their applications and impacts across four applications: economic operation, grid services, heat recovery, and capacity planning. It reveals that LEHM, NEHM, and IEHHM are employed in 35%, 42%, and 23% of these applications, respectively. Finally, a discussion of current modeling limitations and future direction is provided. This paper offers valuable insights and guidance for selecting appropriate AEL models in decision-making studies and identifying pathways for advancing AEL modeling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 116005"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of alkaline electrolyzer technology modeling and applications for decision-making optimization in energy systems\",\"authors\":\"Chunjun Huang ,&nbsp;José Luis Rueda Torres ,&nbsp;Yi Zong ,&nbsp;Shi You ,&nbsp;Xin Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Power-to-hydrogen systems, particularly the most mature alkaline electrolyzers (AELs), are increasingly deployed in modern energy systems due to their pivotal role in green hydrogen production and decarbonization. Proper modeling is vital for optimizing AEL lifecycle decisions, including design, operation, and investment. Despite numerous proposed models, a review focusing on their applications in system-level decision-making (e.g., operation and planning) remains lacking. This paper bridges this gap by reviewing over 100 peer-reviewed articles to offer an in-depth overview of AEL models employed in system-level decision-making. Followed by clarifying modeling requirements across different levels of AEL system analysis, three types of AEL models are classified in system-level decision-making: linear electricity–hydrogen (LEHM), nonlinear electricity–hydrogen (NEHM), and integrated electricity-heat-hydrogen models (IEHHM). This classification is based on representing the AEL with different levels of multi-physics detail and energy conversion assumptions. LEHM assumes a constant electricity-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of typically about 60%–70%, while NEHM and IEHHM allow modeling of dynamic efficiency variations in the typical range of 60%–80%, where the IEHHM uniquely integrates thermal dynamics. Their modeling principles, characteristics, strengths, and limitations are systematically reviewed, followed by an in-depth overview of their applications and impacts across four applications: economic operation, grid services, heat recovery, and capacity planning. It reveals that LEHM, NEHM, and IEHHM are employed in 35%, 42%, and 23% of these applications, respectively. Finally, a discussion of current modeling limitations and future direction is provided. This paper offers valuable insights and guidance for selecting appropriate AEL models in decision-making studies and identifying pathways for advancing AEL modeling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125006781\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125006781","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电力制氢系统,特别是最成熟的碱性电解槽(AELs),由于其在绿色制氢和脱碳方面的关键作用,越来越多地应用于现代能源系统。适当的建模对于优化AEL生命周期决策(包括设计、操作和投资)至关重要。尽管提出了许多模型,但仍然缺乏对其在系统级决策(例如,操作和规划)中的应用的审查。本文通过回顾100多篇同行评议的文章,对系统级决策中使用的AEL模型进行了深入的概述,从而弥补了这一差距。其次,明确了AEL系统分析不同层次的建模要求,在系统级决策中将AEL模型分为线性电-氢模型(LEHM)、非线性电-氢模型(NEHM)和综合电-热-氢模型(IEHHM)。这种分类是基于用不同层次的多物理场细节和能量转换假设来表示AEL。LEHM假设恒定的电-氢转换效率通常约为60%-70%,而NEHM和iehm允许在60%-80%的典型范围内对动态效率变化进行建模,其中iehm独特地集成了热动力学。系统地回顾了它们的建模原理、特征、优势和局限性,然后深入概述了它们在四个应用中的应用和影响:经济运行、电网服务、热回收和容量规划。研究表明,LEHM、NEHM和iehm分别在35%、42%和23%的应用中使用。最后,讨论了当前模型的局限性和未来的发展方向。本文为决策研究中选择合适的AEL模型和确定推进AEL建模的途径提供了有价值的见解和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of alkaline electrolyzer technology modeling and applications for decision-making optimization in energy systems
Power-to-hydrogen systems, particularly the most mature alkaline electrolyzers (AELs), are increasingly deployed in modern energy systems due to their pivotal role in green hydrogen production and decarbonization. Proper modeling is vital for optimizing AEL lifecycle decisions, including design, operation, and investment. Despite numerous proposed models, a review focusing on their applications in system-level decision-making (e.g., operation and planning) remains lacking. This paper bridges this gap by reviewing over 100 peer-reviewed articles to offer an in-depth overview of AEL models employed in system-level decision-making. Followed by clarifying modeling requirements across different levels of AEL system analysis, three types of AEL models are classified in system-level decision-making: linear electricity–hydrogen (LEHM), nonlinear electricity–hydrogen (NEHM), and integrated electricity-heat-hydrogen models (IEHHM). This classification is based on representing the AEL with different levels of multi-physics detail and energy conversion assumptions. LEHM assumes a constant electricity-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of typically about 60%–70%, while NEHM and IEHHM allow modeling of dynamic efficiency variations in the typical range of 60%–80%, where the IEHHM uniquely integrates thermal dynamics. Their modeling principles, characteristics, strengths, and limitations are systematically reviewed, followed by an in-depth overview of their applications and impacts across four applications: economic operation, grid services, heat recovery, and capacity planning. It reveals that LEHM, NEHM, and IEHHM are employed in 35%, 42%, and 23% of these applications, respectively. Finally, a discussion of current modeling limitations and future direction is provided. This paper offers valuable insights and guidance for selecting appropriate AEL models in decision-making studies and identifying pathways for advancing AEL modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信