全球生产情景:跨价值链的实际拆分、潜在重新捆绑和地缘经济重新布线

Raffaele Giammetti , Ariel L. Wirkierman
{"title":"全球生产情景:跨价值链的实际拆分、潜在重新捆绑和地缘经济重新布线","authors":"Raffaele Giammetti ,&nbsp;Ariel L. Wirkierman","doi":"10.1016/j.inteco.2025.100616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We analyze the cross-country distributional effects of global production reconfiguration by means of two multisectoral accounting exercises. First, we simulate counterfactuals that decouple input structures from final demand composition, showing that it is not trade integration per se that determines value-added outcomes, but the fit between production architectures and final demand geography. Second, we model three geoeconomic fragmentation scenarios – involving unilateral provocation and retaliatory decoupling – based on bloc-specific trade restrictions among US-led, China-led and Non-Aligned country blocs. Results reveal asymmetric impacts: large, globally embedded economies face significant losses, while gains concentrate in geoeconomically aligned or flexibly positioned economies. Sectoral outcomes vary with value-chain positioning. The paper provides a global multisectoral accounting perspective to analyses of supply chain disruptions, emphasizing that the same inter-country input trade interdependence that once brought efficiency gains may now act as a constraint in shaping resilience under trade realignment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13794,"journal":{"name":"International Economics","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 100616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global production scenarios: Actual unbundling, potential rebundling and geoeconomic rewiring across value chains\",\"authors\":\"Raffaele Giammetti ,&nbsp;Ariel L. Wirkierman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inteco.2025.100616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We analyze the cross-country distributional effects of global production reconfiguration by means of two multisectoral accounting exercises. First, we simulate counterfactuals that decouple input structures from final demand composition, showing that it is not trade integration per se that determines value-added outcomes, but the fit between production architectures and final demand geography. Second, we model three geoeconomic fragmentation scenarios – involving unilateral provocation and retaliatory decoupling – based on bloc-specific trade restrictions among US-led, China-led and Non-Aligned country blocs. Results reveal asymmetric impacts: large, globally embedded economies face significant losses, while gains concentrate in geoeconomically aligned or flexibly positioned economies. Sectoral outcomes vary with value-chain positioning. The paper provides a global multisectoral accounting perspective to analyses of supply chain disruptions, emphasizing that the same inter-country input trade interdependence that once brought efficiency gains may now act as a constraint in shaping resilience under trade realignment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Economics\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701725000393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701725000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过两个多部门的会计练习来分析全球生产重组的跨国分配效应。首先,我们模拟了将输入结构与最终需求组成分离的反事实,表明决定增值结果的不是贸易整合本身,而是生产架构与最终需求地理之间的契合。其次,我们基于美国领导的、中国领导的和不结盟国家集团之间特定的贸易限制,模拟了三种地缘经济分裂情景——包括单边挑衅和报复性脱钩。研究结果揭示了不对称影响:全球一体化的大型经济体面临重大损失,而收益集中在地缘经济结盟或定位灵活的经济体。各行业的结果因价值链定位而异。本文为供应链中断分析提供了全球多部门会计视角,强调曾经带来效率提高的国家间投入贸易相互依赖,现在可能成为贸易调整下形成韧性的制约因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global production scenarios: Actual unbundling, potential rebundling and geoeconomic rewiring across value chains
We analyze the cross-country distributional effects of global production reconfiguration by means of two multisectoral accounting exercises. First, we simulate counterfactuals that decouple input structures from final demand composition, showing that it is not trade integration per se that determines value-added outcomes, but the fit between production architectures and final demand geography. Second, we model three geoeconomic fragmentation scenarios – involving unilateral provocation and retaliatory decoupling – based on bloc-specific trade restrictions among US-led, China-led and Non-Aligned country blocs. Results reveal asymmetric impacts: large, globally embedded economies face significant losses, while gains concentrate in geoeconomically aligned or flexibly positioned economies. Sectoral outcomes vary with value-chain positioning. The paper provides a global multisectoral accounting perspective to analyses of supply chain disruptions, emphasizing that the same inter-country input trade interdependence that once brought efficiency gains may now act as a constraint in shaping resilience under trade realignment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Economics
International Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信