植物性汉堡:蛋白质来源、挤压类型和烹饪技术对其氧化状态和体外消化率的影响

IF 7.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Itziar Ariz-Hernandez , Iciar Astiasaran , Diana Ansorena
{"title":"植物性汉堡:蛋白质来源、挤压类型和烹饪技术对其氧化状态和体外消化率的影响","authors":"Itziar Ariz-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Iciar Astiasaran ,&nbsp;Diana Ansorena","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effects of cooking method (microwaving/pan frying) and in vitro digestion of plant-based burgers formulated with different protein types (soy/pea) and extrusion types (low/high moisture) were assessed. A conventional beef burger was used as control. Every formulation was adjusted to 18.1–19.5 % of protein. Plant-based burgers showed lower cooking losses (4–13 %) than beef burgers (26–30 %), with microwaving resulting in the highest losses across all samples. Plant-based burgers formulated with high moisture extrusion showed the lowest protein digestibility (66.8–73.2 %). No effect of the cooking method was observed in lipid and protein digestibility in any sample. Soluble peptides increased during in vitro digestion in all samples, with beef burgers showing the lowest levels. The amount of malondialdehyde increased whereas carbonyls decreased in the bioaccessible fraction in all samples during in vitro digestion. Burgers formulated with low moisture extrusion showed the highest lipid oxidation, both after cooking and after in vitro digestion. DPPH values decreased (17–59 %) and ABTS increased (277–810 %) during in vitro digestion. These results suggest that the protein digestibility and lipid oxidation of plant-based burgers (before and after digestion), are more strongly influenced by the type of extrusion than by the type of protein or cooking method applied.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100712"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant-based burgers: effects of protein source, type of extrusion and cooking technology on oxidation status and in vitro digestibility\",\"authors\":\"Itziar Ariz-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Iciar Astiasaran ,&nbsp;Diana Ansorena\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The effects of cooking method (microwaving/pan frying) and in vitro digestion of plant-based burgers formulated with different protein types (soy/pea) and extrusion types (low/high moisture) were assessed. A conventional beef burger was used as control. Every formulation was adjusted to 18.1–19.5 % of protein. Plant-based burgers showed lower cooking losses (4–13 %) than beef burgers (26–30 %), with microwaving resulting in the highest losses across all samples. Plant-based burgers formulated with high moisture extrusion showed the lowest protein digestibility (66.8–73.2 %). No effect of the cooking method was observed in lipid and protein digestibility in any sample. Soluble peptides increased during in vitro digestion in all samples, with beef burgers showing the lowest levels. The amount of malondialdehyde increased whereas carbonyls decreased in the bioaccessible fraction in all samples during in vitro digestion. Burgers formulated with low moisture extrusion showed the highest lipid oxidation, both after cooking and after in vitro digestion. DPPH values decreased (17–59 %) and ABTS increased (277–810 %) during in vitro digestion. These results suggest that the protein digestibility and lipid oxidation of plant-based burgers (before and after digestion), are more strongly influenced by the type of extrusion than by the type of protein or cooking method applied.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Foods\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100712\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833525001716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833525001716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估了不同蛋白质类型(大豆/豌豆)和挤压类型(低水分/高水分)配制的植物性汉堡的烹饪方法(微波/平底锅煎炸)和体外消化的影响。一个传统的牛肉汉堡作为对照。每种配方的蛋白质含量调整为18.1 - 19.5%。植物性汉堡的烹饪损失(4 - 13%)低于牛肉汉堡(26 - 30%),微波导致的损失在所有样品中最高。高水分挤压配方的植物性汉堡蛋白质消化率最低(66.8 - 73.2%)。未观察到蒸煮方法对任何样品的脂质和蛋白质消化率的影响。可溶性肽在所有样品的体外消化过程中都增加了,牛肉汉堡显示出最低的水平。在体外消化过程中,所有样品的生物可及部分中丙二醛的含量增加,而羰基含量减少。低水分挤压配方的汉堡在烹调和体外消化后均显示出最高的脂质氧化。体外消化过程中DPPH值降低(17 - 59%),ABTS升高(277 - 810%)。这些结果表明,植物基汉堡的蛋白质消化率和脂质氧化(消化前后)受挤压类型的影响比对所采用的蛋白质类型或烹饪方法的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Plant-based burgers: effects of protein source, type of extrusion and cooking technology on oxidation status and in vitro digestibility

Plant-based burgers: effects of protein source, type of extrusion and cooking technology on oxidation status and in vitro digestibility
The effects of cooking method (microwaving/pan frying) and in vitro digestion of plant-based burgers formulated with different protein types (soy/pea) and extrusion types (low/high moisture) were assessed. A conventional beef burger was used as control. Every formulation was adjusted to 18.1–19.5 % of protein. Plant-based burgers showed lower cooking losses (4–13 %) than beef burgers (26–30 %), with microwaving resulting in the highest losses across all samples. Plant-based burgers formulated with high moisture extrusion showed the lowest protein digestibility (66.8–73.2 %). No effect of the cooking method was observed in lipid and protein digestibility in any sample. Soluble peptides increased during in vitro digestion in all samples, with beef burgers showing the lowest levels. The amount of malondialdehyde increased whereas carbonyls decreased in the bioaccessible fraction in all samples during in vitro digestion. Burgers formulated with low moisture extrusion showed the highest lipid oxidation, both after cooking and after in vitro digestion. DPPH values decreased (17–59 %) and ABTS increased (277–810 %) during in vitro digestion. These results suggest that the protein digestibility and lipid oxidation of plant-based burgers (before and after digestion), are more strongly influenced by the type of extrusion than by the type of protein or cooking method applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Foods is a specialized journal that is dedicated to tackling the challenges posed by climate change and the need for sustainability in the realm of food production. The journal recognizes the imperative to transform current food manufacturing and consumption practices to meet the dietary needs of a burgeoning global population while simultaneously curbing environmental degradation. The mission of Future Foods is to disseminate research that aligns with the goal of fostering the development of innovative technologies and alternative food sources to establish more sustainable food systems. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed articles that contribute to the advancement of sustainable food practices. Abstracting and indexing: Scopus Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) SNIP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信