品味信念的特征及其与品味策略和主观幸福感的关联:一个潜在特征分析

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Mengying Gao , Intan Hashimah Mohd Hashim , Shahla Ostovar
{"title":"品味信念的特征及其与品味策略和主观幸福感的关联:一个潜在特征分析","authors":"Mengying Gao ,&nbsp;Intan Hashimah Mohd Hashim ,&nbsp;Shahla Ostovar","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of savoring strategies influences the development of savoring beliefs, which significantly shape subjective well-being. Savoring beliefs serve as a critical indicator of an individual's savoring ability. This study adopts a person-centered perspective to identify distinct profiles of savoring beliefs and examines the differences in savoring strategy use and subjective well-being (including life satisfaction, positive and negative affect) across these profiles. Two studies were conducted with samples of high school students (<em>N</em> = 418) and university students (<em>N</em> = 917). Latent profile analysis (LPA) results revealed consistent classifications of savoring beliefs in both samples, divided into three profiles: <em>future-oriented</em> (6.48 %, 6.61 %), <em>high savoring</em> (45.89 %, 58.37 %), and <em>moderate savoring</em> (47.63 %, 35.02 %). Subsequent analyses in the university student sample showed significant differences in savoring strategy use across profiles using the R3STEP command and in subjective well-being across profiles using the BCH method. Additionally, individuals in the <em>high savoring</em> profile exhibited the highest levels of subjective well-being, followed by those in the <em>future-oriented</em> profile, while the <em>moderate savoring</em> profile reported the lowest levels. These findings underscore the distinct nature of savoring belief profiles, especially the identification of <em>future-oriented</em> profile, offering both theoretical and practical implications and providing valuable directions for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 113373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiles of savoring beliefs and their associations with savoring strategies and subjective well-being: A latent profile analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mengying Gao ,&nbsp;Intan Hashimah Mohd Hashim ,&nbsp;Shahla Ostovar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The use of savoring strategies influences the development of savoring beliefs, which significantly shape subjective well-being. Savoring beliefs serve as a critical indicator of an individual's savoring ability. This study adopts a person-centered perspective to identify distinct profiles of savoring beliefs and examines the differences in savoring strategy use and subjective well-being (including life satisfaction, positive and negative affect) across these profiles. Two studies were conducted with samples of high school students (<em>N</em> = 418) and university students (<em>N</em> = 917). Latent profile analysis (LPA) results revealed consistent classifications of savoring beliefs in both samples, divided into three profiles: <em>future-oriented</em> (6.48 %, 6.61 %), <em>high savoring</em> (45.89 %, 58.37 %), and <em>moderate savoring</em> (47.63 %, 35.02 %). Subsequent analyses in the university student sample showed significant differences in savoring strategy use across profiles using the R3STEP command and in subjective well-being across profiles using the BCH method. Additionally, individuals in the <em>high savoring</em> profile exhibited the highest levels of subjective well-being, followed by those in the <em>future-oriented</em> profile, while the <em>moderate savoring</em> profile reported the lowest levels. These findings underscore the distinct nature of savoring belief profiles, especially the identification of <em>future-oriented</em> profile, offering both theoretical and practical implications and providing valuable directions for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"246 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003356\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

品味策略的使用影响着品味信念的发展,而品味信念对主观幸福感有着重要的影响。品味信念是衡量个人品味能力的重要指标。本研究采用以人为本的视角来识别品味信念的不同特征,并研究了这些特征在品味策略使用和主观幸福感(包括生活满意度、积极影响和消极影响)方面的差异。两项研究的样本分别为高中生(N = 418)和大学生(N = 917)。潜在剖面分析(LPA)结果显示,两个样本的品味信念分类一致,分为三个剖面:未来导向(6.48%,6.61%),高品味(45.89%,58.37%)和中等品味(47.63%,35.02%)。随后对大学生样本的分析表明,使用R3STEP命令在不同profile中使用品味策略,使用BCH方法在不同profile中使用主观幸福感存在显著差异。此外,高品味的个体表现出最高的主观幸福感,其次是面向未来的个体,而中等品味的个体表现出最低的主观幸福感。这些发现强调了品味信念特征的独特性,特别是未来导向特征的识别,为未来的研究提供了理论和实践意义,并为未来的研究提供了有价值的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profiles of savoring beliefs and their associations with savoring strategies and subjective well-being: A latent profile analysis
The use of savoring strategies influences the development of savoring beliefs, which significantly shape subjective well-being. Savoring beliefs serve as a critical indicator of an individual's savoring ability. This study adopts a person-centered perspective to identify distinct profiles of savoring beliefs and examines the differences in savoring strategy use and subjective well-being (including life satisfaction, positive and negative affect) across these profiles. Two studies were conducted with samples of high school students (N = 418) and university students (N = 917). Latent profile analysis (LPA) results revealed consistent classifications of savoring beliefs in both samples, divided into three profiles: future-oriented (6.48 %, 6.61 %), high savoring (45.89 %, 58.37 %), and moderate savoring (47.63 %, 35.02 %). Subsequent analyses in the university student sample showed significant differences in savoring strategy use across profiles using the R3STEP command and in subjective well-being across profiles using the BCH method. Additionally, individuals in the high savoring profile exhibited the highest levels of subjective well-being, followed by those in the future-oriented profile, while the moderate savoring profile reported the lowest levels. These findings underscore the distinct nature of savoring belief profiles, especially the identification of future-oriented profile, offering both theoretical and practical implications and providing valuable directions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信