{"title":"大型木结构建筑隐含温室气体(GHG)排放:基于生命周期评估数据库的比较研究","authors":"Zhuocheng Duan, Hossein Omrany, Jian Zuo","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With global efforts in reducing building operational energy consumption, attention is increasingly turning toward mitigating embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from building materials manufacturing and processing, particularly for emerging materials like mass timber. Quantifying embodied emissions typically requires the use of GHG emission coefficients from life cycle assessment (LCA) databases. However, significant variability persists in the results of LCA studies while their underlying causes remain largely unexplored. Therefore, this research aims to compare embodied GHG emissions data of mass timber across five widely used LCA databases (Ecoinvent, AusLCI, EPiC, ICE, and ÖKOBAUDAT). Through detailed examination at material and building levels, the research reveals significant methodological inconsistencies that create substantial variations in embodied emissions. At the material level, mass timber emissions span from -686.80 to 1718.00 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/m<sup>3</sup>. Building-level analysis (A1-A3) reveals emission ranges of -170.31 to 434.62 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/m<sup>2</sup> for mass timber construction and 69.79 to 485.95 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/m<sup>2</sup> for concrete buildings. The study identifies several challenges in current mass timber LCAs, including inconsistent treatment of biogenic carbon flow, varying system boundary definitions, and inadequate consideration of End-of-Life (EoL) processes for mass timber. Regional variations in manufacturing processes, energy sources, and transportation distances emerge as essential factors influencing data quality. This highlights the need for establishing standardized approaches for biogenic carbon accounting, implementing detailed material documentation systems, and developing more comprehensive and transparent databases to enhance the reliability of mass timber LCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 108491"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of mass timber construction: A comparative study of life cycle assessment databases\",\"authors\":\"Zhuocheng Duan, Hossein Omrany, Jian Zuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With global efforts in reducing building operational energy consumption, attention is increasingly turning toward mitigating embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from building materials manufacturing and processing, particularly for emerging materials like mass timber. Quantifying embodied emissions typically requires the use of GHG emission coefficients from life cycle assessment (LCA) databases. However, significant variability persists in the results of LCA studies while their underlying causes remain largely unexplored. Therefore, this research aims to compare embodied GHG emissions data of mass timber across five widely used LCA databases (Ecoinvent, AusLCI, EPiC, ICE, and ÖKOBAUDAT). Through detailed examination at material and building levels, the research reveals significant methodological inconsistencies that create substantial variations in embodied emissions. At the material level, mass timber emissions span from -686.80 to 1718.00 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/m<sup>3</sup>. Building-level analysis (A1-A3) reveals emission ranges of -170.31 to 434.62 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/m<sup>2</sup> for mass timber construction and 69.79 to 485.95 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/m<sup>2</sup> for concrete buildings. The study identifies several challenges in current mass timber LCAs, including inconsistent treatment of biogenic carbon flow, varying system boundary definitions, and inadequate consideration of End-of-Life (EoL) processes for mass timber. Regional variations in manufacturing processes, energy sources, and transportation distances emerge as essential factors influencing data quality. This highlights the need for establishing standardized approaches for biogenic carbon accounting, implementing detailed material documentation systems, and developing more comprehensive and transparent databases to enhance the reliability of mass timber LCA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"223 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003696\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of mass timber construction: A comparative study of life cycle assessment databases
With global efforts in reducing building operational energy consumption, attention is increasingly turning toward mitigating embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from building materials manufacturing and processing, particularly for emerging materials like mass timber. Quantifying embodied emissions typically requires the use of GHG emission coefficients from life cycle assessment (LCA) databases. However, significant variability persists in the results of LCA studies while their underlying causes remain largely unexplored. Therefore, this research aims to compare embodied GHG emissions data of mass timber across five widely used LCA databases (Ecoinvent, AusLCI, EPiC, ICE, and ÖKOBAUDAT). Through detailed examination at material and building levels, the research reveals significant methodological inconsistencies that create substantial variations in embodied emissions. At the material level, mass timber emissions span from -686.80 to 1718.00 kgCO2eq/m3. Building-level analysis (A1-A3) reveals emission ranges of -170.31 to 434.62 kgCO2eq/m2 for mass timber construction and 69.79 to 485.95 kgCO2eq/m2 for concrete buildings. The study identifies several challenges in current mass timber LCAs, including inconsistent treatment of biogenic carbon flow, varying system boundary definitions, and inadequate consideration of End-of-Life (EoL) processes for mass timber. Regional variations in manufacturing processes, energy sources, and transportation distances emerge as essential factors influencing data quality. This highlights the need for establishing standardized approaches for biogenic carbon accounting, implementing detailed material documentation systems, and developing more comprehensive and transparent databases to enhance the reliability of mass timber LCA.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.