Alexis M. Yaculak , Jinjun Kan , Marc Peipoch , Joseph G. Galella , Erin K. Peck , Sujay S. Kaushal , Tara L.E. Trammell , Shreeram P. Inamdar
{"title":"古水化土壤的生物地球化学恢复及其在当代洪泛平原恢复中的作用","authors":"Alexis M. Yaculak , Jinjun Kan , Marc Peipoch , Joseph G. Galella , Erin K. Peck , Sujay S. Kaushal , Tara L.E. Trammell , Shreeram P. Inamdar","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stream restoration has become a popular management practice to mitigate sediment and nutrient pollution and to meet regulatory water quality targets. Many of these restorations, however, fail to account for the pre-disturbance conditions underlying historical legacy impacts (farming, damming, deforestation, etc.) and how they can be leveraged for more environmentally effective restorations. Here, we assessed the biogeochemical recovery of ancient, previously buried, hydric soil on a restored floodplain surface and its potential for providing denitrification ecosystem services. Relict hydric soil along with contemporary wetland soils were evaluated for three years at the Gramies Run restoration site in Maryland. Porewater sampling was conducted monthly, and soil samples were collected every six months, both of which were evaluated for total carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), nitrate and ammonium-N, N process rates (denitrification and net nitrification and mineralization) and living microbial biomass. Oxidation of hydric soils released inorganic N, but the dissolved N concentrations were low (≤ 1 mg/L). Denitrification rates in the hydric soil were low in year 1 (1–4 μg kg<sup>−1</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) but slowly increased to higher values by year 3 (10–47 μg kg<sup>−1</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>). Our observations suggest that relict hydric soils will require three or more years to provide restoration ecosystem services like improved denitrification and slow gains must be considered in water quality expectations from restoration. We also recommend that hydric soils be retained in-situ, undisturbed, where they are at their original elevations and soil moisture conditions for quicker recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 107733"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biogeochemical recovery and role of ancient hydric soils in contemporary floodplain restorations\",\"authors\":\"Alexis M. Yaculak , Jinjun Kan , Marc Peipoch , Joseph G. Galella , Erin K. Peck , Sujay S. Kaushal , Tara L.E. Trammell , Shreeram P. Inamdar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Stream restoration has become a popular management practice to mitigate sediment and nutrient pollution and to meet regulatory water quality targets. Many of these restorations, however, fail to account for the pre-disturbance conditions underlying historical legacy impacts (farming, damming, deforestation, etc.) and how they can be leveraged for more environmentally effective restorations. Here, we assessed the biogeochemical recovery of ancient, previously buried, hydric soil on a restored floodplain surface and its potential for providing denitrification ecosystem services. Relict hydric soil along with contemporary wetland soils were evaluated for three years at the Gramies Run restoration site in Maryland. Porewater sampling was conducted monthly, and soil samples were collected every six months, both of which were evaluated for total carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), nitrate and ammonium-N, N process rates (denitrification and net nitrification and mineralization) and living microbial biomass. Oxidation of hydric soils released inorganic N, but the dissolved N concentrations were low (≤ 1 mg/L). Denitrification rates in the hydric soil were low in year 1 (1–4 μg kg<sup>−1</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) but slowly increased to higher values by year 3 (10–47 μg kg<sup>−1</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>). Our observations suggest that relict hydric soils will require three or more years to provide restoration ecosystem services like improved denitrification and slow gains must be considered in water quality expectations from restoration. We also recommend that hydric soils be retained in-situ, undisturbed, where they are at their original elevations and soil moisture conditions for quicker recovery.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500223X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500223X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biogeochemical recovery and role of ancient hydric soils in contemporary floodplain restorations
Stream restoration has become a popular management practice to mitigate sediment and nutrient pollution and to meet regulatory water quality targets. Many of these restorations, however, fail to account for the pre-disturbance conditions underlying historical legacy impacts (farming, damming, deforestation, etc.) and how they can be leveraged for more environmentally effective restorations. Here, we assessed the biogeochemical recovery of ancient, previously buried, hydric soil on a restored floodplain surface and its potential for providing denitrification ecosystem services. Relict hydric soil along with contemporary wetland soils were evaluated for three years at the Gramies Run restoration site in Maryland. Porewater sampling was conducted monthly, and soil samples were collected every six months, both of which were evaluated for total carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), nitrate and ammonium-N, N process rates (denitrification and net nitrification and mineralization) and living microbial biomass. Oxidation of hydric soils released inorganic N, but the dissolved N concentrations were low (≤ 1 mg/L). Denitrification rates in the hydric soil were low in year 1 (1–4 μg kg−1 h−1) but slowly increased to higher values by year 3 (10–47 μg kg−1 h−1). Our observations suggest that relict hydric soils will require three or more years to provide restoration ecosystem services like improved denitrification and slow gains must be considered in water quality expectations from restoration. We also recommend that hydric soils be retained in-situ, undisturbed, where they are at their original elevations and soil moisture conditions for quicker recovery.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.