与单独使用地塞米松相比,地塞米松和昂丹司琼联合使用可减少正颌手术术后恶心和呕吐:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

Yuna Kang, Kyotaro Koshika, Keiko Takashima, Ai Nakakuki, Kazuya Hasunuma, Mayuko Hayashi, Kaori Miyamoto, Maho Yamamoto, Kaori Yoshida, Tatsuya Ichinohe
{"title":"与单独使用地塞米松相比,地塞米松和昂丹司琼联合使用可减少正颌手术术后恶心和呕吐:一项前瞻性随机对照试验","authors":"Yuna Kang, Kyotaro Koshika, Keiko Takashima, Ai Nakakuki, Kazuya Hasunuma, Mayuko Hayashi, Kaori Miyamoto, Maho Yamamoto, Kaori Yoshida, Tatsuya Ichinohe","doi":"10.2344/23-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone alone and dexamethasone-ondansetron combined for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled to undergo mandibular orthognathic surgery who were 18 to 50 years of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were enrolled. Dexamethasone 6.6 mg was administered after intubation, followed by either ondansetron 4 mg (group DO) or saline placebo (group D) 15 minutes before the end of surgery. Nausea severity was assessed at 3 times postoperatively (immediately after the end of anesthesia, 2 hours later, and 24 hours later) using a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). If a patient complained of postoperative nausea or vomited, the NRS score was reevaluated. If the NRS score was 3 or higher, intravenous metoclopramide 10 mg was administered for PONV rescue. Assessed data included nausea NRS scores, vomiting, metoclopramide use, and other patient demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean nausea NRS scores at 2 hours were significantly lower in group DO vs group D (0.3 vs 2.1; P = .003), but differences in vomiting rates were not significant (P > .05). PONV rescue rates with metoclopramide were lower overall and at 2 hours later in group DO (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexamethasone combined with ondansetron was more effective in preventing early postoperative nausea and reducing need for PONV rescue than dexamethasone alone for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"72 1","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dexamethasone and Ondansetron Combined Decreases Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Orthognathic Surgery Compared With Dexamethasone Alone: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yuna Kang, Kyotaro Koshika, Keiko Takashima, Ai Nakakuki, Kazuya Hasunuma, Mayuko Hayashi, Kaori Miyamoto, Maho Yamamoto, Kaori Yoshida, Tatsuya Ichinohe\",\"doi\":\"10.2344/23-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone alone and dexamethasone-ondansetron combined for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled to undergo mandibular orthognathic surgery who were 18 to 50 years of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were enrolled. Dexamethasone 6.6 mg was administered after intubation, followed by either ondansetron 4 mg (group DO) or saline placebo (group D) 15 minutes before the end of surgery. Nausea severity was assessed at 3 times postoperatively (immediately after the end of anesthesia, 2 hours later, and 24 hours later) using a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). If a patient complained of postoperative nausea or vomited, the NRS score was reevaluated. If the NRS score was 3 or higher, intravenous metoclopramide 10 mg was administered for PONV rescue. Assessed data included nausea NRS scores, vomiting, metoclopramide use, and other patient demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean nausea NRS scores at 2 hours were significantly lower in group DO vs group D (0.3 vs 2.1; P = .003), but differences in vomiting rates were not significant (P > .05). PONV rescue rates with metoclopramide were lower overall and at 2 hours later in group DO (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexamethasone combined with ondansetron was more effective in preventing early postoperative nausea and reducing need for PONV rescue than dexamethasone alone for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"3-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922510/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2344/23-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/23-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较地塞米松单用与地塞米松-昂丹司琼联用预防正颌手术患者术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的疗效。方法:纳入年龄在18 ~ 50岁,美国麻醉医师协会身体状况I或II的计划行下颌正颌手术的患者。插管后给予地塞米松6.6 mg,手术结束前15分钟给予昂丹司琼4 mg (DO组)或生理盐水安慰剂(D组)。术后3次(麻醉结束后立即,2小时后和24小时后)使用11分数字评定量表(NRS)评估恶心严重程度。如果患者抱怨术后恶心或呕吐,则重新评估NRS评分。如果NRS评分为3分或更高,则静脉给予甲氧氯普胺10mg用于PONV抢救。评估数据包括恶心NRS评分、呕吐、甲氧氯普胺使用和其他患者人口统计数据。结果:DO组2小时恶心NRS平均评分明显低于D组(0.3 vs 2.1;P = 0.003),但呕吐率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。甲氧氯普胺在DO组的PONV抢救率总体和2小时后均较低(P < 0.001)。结论:与单用地塞米松相比,地塞米松联用昂丹司琼预防术后早期恶心和减少PONV抢救的效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dexamethasone and Ondansetron Combined Decreases Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Orthognathic Surgery Compared With Dexamethasone Alone: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone alone and dexamethasone-ondansetron combined for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.

Methods: Patients scheduled to undergo mandibular orthognathic surgery who were 18 to 50 years of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were enrolled. Dexamethasone 6.6 mg was administered after intubation, followed by either ondansetron 4 mg (group DO) or saline placebo (group D) 15 minutes before the end of surgery. Nausea severity was assessed at 3 times postoperatively (immediately after the end of anesthesia, 2 hours later, and 24 hours later) using a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). If a patient complained of postoperative nausea or vomited, the NRS score was reevaluated. If the NRS score was 3 or higher, intravenous metoclopramide 10 mg was administered for PONV rescue. Assessed data included nausea NRS scores, vomiting, metoclopramide use, and other patient demographics.

Results: Mean nausea NRS scores at 2 hours were significantly lower in group DO vs group D (0.3 vs 2.1; P = .003), but differences in vomiting rates were not significant (P > .05). PONV rescue rates with metoclopramide were lower overall and at 2 hours later in group DO (P < .001).

Conclusion: Dexamethasone combined with ondansetron was more effective in preventing early postoperative nausea and reducing need for PONV rescue than dexamethasone alone for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信