在2024年获得牙科局麻药管理的书面知情同意,一项20年随访研究。

Daniel L Orr, Zane P Jenkins, Timothy M Orr
{"title":"在2024年获得牙科局麻药管理的书面知情同意,一项20年随访研究。","authors":"Daniel L Orr, Zane P Jenkins, Timothy M Orr","doi":"10.2344/24-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study revisited data obtained in 2004 regarding whether dentists routinely obtain informed consent (IC) for the administration of local anesthetics and compared those findings with newer data obtained in 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previous survey from 2004 which utilized 3 questions including identification of provider type (generalist or specialist) and whether IC is always obtained for local anesthetic administration was replicated in 2024. While the 2004 survey was performed on paper, the 2024 survey was done via a brief oral interview. Both efforts were completed at the annual meetings of The American Dental Society of Anesthesiology (ADSA) in Las Vegas, NV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 249 respondents opted to participate in the 2024 survey as compared with the 252 respondents from 2004. During the past 20 years, the number of dentists who reported always obtaining IC for the administration of local anesthetics appears to have increased significantly. A total of 196 (79%) of the 2024 participants reported always obtaining IC for local anesthesia compared with 158 (63%) in 2004. Except for dentists limiting their practice to anesthesiology, all other provider categories reported an increase in IC use from 2004 to 2024, and specialists still reported obtaining IC for local anesthesia more frequently than generalists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of including local anesthetic administration with the IC process is increasing in the profession. It is likely that generalists administer many more local anesthetics than specialists overall. The IC subject matter is too nuanced to recommend a single \"yes or no\" treatment plan as the standard of care for all clinical situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"72 1","pages":"24-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obtaining Written Informed Consent for the Administration of Local Anesthetics in Dentistry in 2024, a 20-Year Follow-Up Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel L Orr, Zane P Jenkins, Timothy M Orr\",\"doi\":\"10.2344/24-0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study revisited data obtained in 2004 regarding whether dentists routinely obtain informed consent (IC) for the administration of local anesthetics and compared those findings with newer data obtained in 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previous survey from 2004 which utilized 3 questions including identification of provider type (generalist or specialist) and whether IC is always obtained for local anesthetic administration was replicated in 2024. While the 2004 survey was performed on paper, the 2024 survey was done via a brief oral interview. Both efforts were completed at the annual meetings of The American Dental Society of Anesthesiology (ADSA) in Las Vegas, NV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 249 respondents opted to participate in the 2024 survey as compared with the 252 respondents from 2004. During the past 20 years, the number of dentists who reported always obtaining IC for the administration of local anesthetics appears to have increased significantly. A total of 196 (79%) of the 2024 participants reported always obtaining IC for local anesthesia compared with 158 (63%) in 2004. Except for dentists limiting their practice to anesthesiology, all other provider categories reported an increase in IC use from 2004 to 2024, and specialists still reported obtaining IC for local anesthesia more frequently than generalists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of including local anesthetic administration with the IC process is increasing in the profession. It is likely that generalists administer many more local anesthetics than specialists overall. The IC subject matter is too nuanced to recommend a single \\\"yes or no\\\" treatment plan as the standard of care for all clinical situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"24-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922507/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2344/24-0039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/24-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究对2004年获得的关于牙医是否常规获得局麻药知情同意(IC)的数据进行了重审,并与2024年获得的最新数据进行了比较。方法:采用2004年的调查方法,在2024年进行重复调查,调查涉及3个问题,包括提供者类型的识别(全科医生或专科医生)和局麻是否总是获得IC。2004年的调查是在纸上进行的,而2024年的调查是通过简短的口头采访完成的。这两项工作都是在内华达州拉斯维加斯举行的美国牙科麻醉学会(ADSA)年会上完成的。结果:与2004年的252名受访者相比,共有249名受访者选择参加2024年的调查。在过去的20年里,报告总是获得IC用于局部麻醉的牙医的数量似乎显著增加。2024名参与者中,共有196人(79%)报告总是获得IC用于局部麻醉,而2004年为158人(63%)。从2004年到2024年,除了牙医将他们的执业范围限制在麻醉学之外,所有其他提供者类别都报告了IC使用的增加,并且专家仍然报告了比全科医生更频繁地获得局部麻醉IC。结论:局部麻醉在IC手术中的应用越来越普遍。全科医生可能比专科医生使用更多的局部麻醉药。IC的主题太微妙,不能推荐一个单一的“是或否”的治疗计划作为所有临床情况的标准护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obtaining Written Informed Consent for the Administration of Local Anesthetics in Dentistry in 2024, a 20-Year Follow-Up Study.

Objective: This study revisited data obtained in 2004 regarding whether dentists routinely obtain informed consent (IC) for the administration of local anesthetics and compared those findings with newer data obtained in 2024.

Methods: A previous survey from 2004 which utilized 3 questions including identification of provider type (generalist or specialist) and whether IC is always obtained for local anesthetic administration was replicated in 2024. While the 2004 survey was performed on paper, the 2024 survey was done via a brief oral interview. Both efforts were completed at the annual meetings of The American Dental Society of Anesthesiology (ADSA) in Las Vegas, NV.

Results: A total of 249 respondents opted to participate in the 2024 survey as compared with the 252 respondents from 2004. During the past 20 years, the number of dentists who reported always obtaining IC for the administration of local anesthetics appears to have increased significantly. A total of 196 (79%) of the 2024 participants reported always obtaining IC for local anesthesia compared with 158 (63%) in 2004. Except for dentists limiting their practice to anesthesiology, all other provider categories reported an increase in IC use from 2004 to 2024, and specialists still reported obtaining IC for local anesthesia more frequently than generalists.

Conclusion: The prevalence of including local anesthetic administration with the IC process is increasing in the profession. It is likely that generalists administer many more local anesthetics than specialists overall. The IC subject matter is too nuanced to recommend a single "yes or no" treatment plan as the standard of care for all clinical situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信