{"title":"基于翅膀几何形态的贝叶斯方法鉴别库蠓(双翅目:蠓科)。","authors":"Nabanita Banerjee, Shuddhasattwa Maitra Mazumdar, Arjun Pal, Debashis Chatterjee, Abhijit Mazumdar","doi":"10.1093/jme/tjaf082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A Bayesian Procrustes analysis (BPA) was used to discriminate livestock-associated species: Culicoides innoxius Sen and Das Gupta, Culicoides peregrinus Kieffer, and Culicoides oxystoma Kieffer. BPA results were compared with classical geometric morphometric analysis (CGMA). Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) parameters, Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, Hellinger distance, and total variation distance were considered. BPA validation was further done using CGMA. BPA depicted significant differences at 95% credible intervals (CrIs) in their posterior distribution of Procrustes variance (σ) between the species with minimum overlap between closely related ones, C. innoxius and C. peregrinus, and no overlap between distantly related C. oxystoma and C. peregrinus; C. innoxius. MCMC posterior convergence plots supported the accuracy of the BPA. In the trace plots, the MCMC explored the parameter space effectively. For the estimation of divergence between the distribution of species, KL divergence, Hellinger distance, and total variance distance were calculated, which exhibited the highest dissimilarity between C. oxystoma and C. innoxius, followed by C. oxystoma and C. peregrinus and the lowest was between C. peregrinus and C. innoxius. The effectiveness of the BPA over CGMA was assessed by incorporating Culicoides regalis individuals within the analysis. In BPA, an erratic convergence plot indicated the presence of C. regalis within the C. innoxius dataset, whereas CGMA could not separate C. regalis. This is probably the first time the Bayesian approach has been used in Culicoides taxonomy. So far, the results have yielded reliable, sensitive, and accurate species identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":94091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical entomology","volume":" ","pages":"1124-1138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel Bayesian approach based on wing geometric morphometry to discriminate Culicoides species (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae).\",\"authors\":\"Nabanita Banerjee, Shuddhasattwa Maitra Mazumdar, Arjun Pal, Debashis Chatterjee, Abhijit Mazumdar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jme/tjaf082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A Bayesian Procrustes analysis (BPA) was used to discriminate livestock-associated species: Culicoides innoxius Sen and Das Gupta, Culicoides peregrinus Kieffer, and Culicoides oxystoma Kieffer. BPA results were compared with classical geometric morphometric analysis (CGMA). Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) parameters, Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, Hellinger distance, and total variation distance were considered. BPA validation was further done using CGMA. BPA depicted significant differences at 95% credible intervals (CrIs) in their posterior distribution of Procrustes variance (σ) between the species with minimum overlap between closely related ones, C. innoxius and C. peregrinus, and no overlap between distantly related C. oxystoma and C. peregrinus; C. innoxius. MCMC posterior convergence plots supported the accuracy of the BPA. In the trace plots, the MCMC explored the parameter space effectively. For the estimation of divergence between the distribution of species, KL divergence, Hellinger distance, and total variance distance were calculated, which exhibited the highest dissimilarity between C. oxystoma and C. innoxius, followed by C. oxystoma and C. peregrinus and the lowest was between C. peregrinus and C. innoxius. The effectiveness of the BPA over CGMA was assessed by incorporating Culicoides regalis individuals within the analysis. In BPA, an erratic convergence plot indicated the presence of C. regalis within the C. innoxius dataset, whereas CGMA could not separate C. regalis. This is probably the first time the Bayesian approach has been used in Culicoides taxonomy. So far, the results have yielded reliable, sensitive, and accurate species identification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical entomology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1124-1138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaf082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaf082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
采用贝叶斯-普罗氏分析(BPA)对家畜亲缘种库蠓(Culicoides innoxius Sen and Das Gupta)、peregrinus Kieffer和oxystoma Kieffer)进行了分类。双酚a结果比较经典几何形态计量分析(CGMA)。考虑了Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)参数、Kullback-Leibler (KL)散度、Hellinger距离和总变异距离。采用CGMA进一步验证BPA。双酚a的Procrustes方差(σ)后方差分布在95%可信区间(CrIs)上差异显著,近亲C. innoxius和C. peregrinus之间重叠最小,远亲C. oxystoma和C. peregrinus之间没有重叠;c . innoxius。MCMC后验收敛图支持BPA的准确性。在轨迹图中,MCMC有效地探索了参数空间。在物种分布差异估计方面,计算了KL差异、Hellinger距离和总方差距离,结果表明,柽柳与柽柳之间的差异最大,其次是柽柳与长尾柽柳,长尾柽柳与长尾柽柳之间的差异最小。通过将帝王库蠓个体纳入分析,评估了双酚a对CGMA的有效性。在BPA中,一个不稳定的收敛图表明在C. innoxius数据集中存在C. regalis,而CGMA不能分离C. regalis。这可能是贝叶斯方法在库蠓分类中的首次应用。到目前为止,这些结果已经产生了可靠、灵敏和准确的物种鉴定。
A novel Bayesian approach based on wing geometric morphometry to discriminate Culicoides species (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae).
A Bayesian Procrustes analysis (BPA) was used to discriminate livestock-associated species: Culicoides innoxius Sen and Das Gupta, Culicoides peregrinus Kieffer, and Culicoides oxystoma Kieffer. BPA results were compared with classical geometric morphometric analysis (CGMA). Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) parameters, Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, Hellinger distance, and total variation distance were considered. BPA validation was further done using CGMA. BPA depicted significant differences at 95% credible intervals (CrIs) in their posterior distribution of Procrustes variance (σ) between the species with minimum overlap between closely related ones, C. innoxius and C. peregrinus, and no overlap between distantly related C. oxystoma and C. peregrinus; C. innoxius. MCMC posterior convergence plots supported the accuracy of the BPA. In the trace plots, the MCMC explored the parameter space effectively. For the estimation of divergence between the distribution of species, KL divergence, Hellinger distance, and total variance distance were calculated, which exhibited the highest dissimilarity between C. oxystoma and C. innoxius, followed by C. oxystoma and C. peregrinus and the lowest was between C. peregrinus and C. innoxius. The effectiveness of the BPA over CGMA was assessed by incorporating Culicoides regalis individuals within the analysis. In BPA, an erratic convergence plot indicated the presence of C. regalis within the C. innoxius dataset, whereas CGMA could not separate C. regalis. This is probably the first time the Bayesian approach has been used in Culicoides taxonomy. So far, the results have yielded reliable, sensitive, and accurate species identification.