促进远程和虚拟访问提供欧洲研究基础设施-要求,问题和建议。

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.18023.2
Michael Raess, Omran Alhaddad, Johanna Bischof, John Dolan, Ayoub El Ghadraoui, Menattallah Elserafy, Marco Galeotti, Ulla Lächele, Xavier Meyer, Oguz Ozkan, Ivan Rodero, Hannele Savela, John Shepherdson, Vanessa Spadetto, Valentina Tegas, Susanne Vainio, Alen Vodopijevec, Bonnie Wolff-Boenisch, Claudia Alen Amaro, Annika Thies
{"title":"促进远程和虚拟访问提供欧洲研究基础设施-要求,问题和建议。","authors":"Michael Raess, Omran Alhaddad, Johanna Bischof, John Dolan, Ayoub El Ghadraoui, Menattallah Elserafy, Marco Galeotti, Ulla Lächele, Xavier Meyer, Oguz Ozkan, Ivan Rodero, Hannele Savela, John Shepherdson, Vanessa Spadetto, Valentina Tegas, Susanne Vainio, Alen Vodopijevec, Bonnie Wolff-Boenisch, Claudia Alen Amaro, Annika Thies","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.18023.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research infrastructures (RIs) are strategic assets facilitating innovation and knowledge advancement across all scientific disciplines. They provide researchers with advanced tools and resources that go beyond individual or institutional capacities and promote collaboration, community-building and the application of scientific standards. Remote and virtual access to RIs enables scientists to use these essential resources without the necessity of being physically present. The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions where a catalyst for the expansion and further development of remote and virtual access models, particularly in fields where physical access had been the predominant model. The eRImote project collected the experiences gained in different scientific fields through targeted surveys, stakeholder workshops, expert groups discussions, and the analysis of specific use cases, with the aim of identifying good practice and presenting recommendations. This paper provides a definition of remote and virtual access and remote training and explores their implementation across various RIs, highlighting the implications for their operational processes and the dynamics of interaction between RIs and their user communities. It presents the identified advantages, obstacles, and best-practices, alongside strategies and recommendations to navigate and mitigate challenges effectively. Key issues and recommendations are summed up separately for remote access, virtual access, and remote training, complemented by general recommendations for facilitating remote and virtual access to RIs. These relate to budgeting and funding, the balancing of RI access models, the need for regulatory frameworks for sample shipments, collaboration among RIs, impact assessment of remote and virtual access on user interactions, operational efficiency and the environment footprint of RIs, and the adaption of data sharing policies. Stakeholders were broadly invited to give their feedback on the paper's findings and conclusions, which were integrated into an improved version of this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"4 ","pages":"152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11364971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitating remote and virtual access provision by European research infrastructures - requirements, issues, and recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Raess, Omran Alhaddad, Johanna Bischof, John Dolan, Ayoub El Ghadraoui, Menattallah Elserafy, Marco Galeotti, Ulla Lächele, Xavier Meyer, Oguz Ozkan, Ivan Rodero, Hannele Savela, John Shepherdson, Vanessa Spadetto, Valentina Tegas, Susanne Vainio, Alen Vodopijevec, Bonnie Wolff-Boenisch, Claudia Alen Amaro, Annika Thies\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/openreseurope.18023.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research infrastructures (RIs) are strategic assets facilitating innovation and knowledge advancement across all scientific disciplines. They provide researchers with advanced tools and resources that go beyond individual or institutional capacities and promote collaboration, community-building and the application of scientific standards. Remote and virtual access to RIs enables scientists to use these essential resources without the necessity of being physically present. The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions where a catalyst for the expansion and further development of remote and virtual access models, particularly in fields where physical access had been the predominant model. The eRImote project collected the experiences gained in different scientific fields through targeted surveys, stakeholder workshops, expert groups discussions, and the analysis of specific use cases, with the aim of identifying good practice and presenting recommendations. This paper provides a definition of remote and virtual access and remote training and explores their implementation across various RIs, highlighting the implications for their operational processes and the dynamics of interaction between RIs and their user communities. It presents the identified advantages, obstacles, and best-practices, alongside strategies and recommendations to navigate and mitigate challenges effectively. Key issues and recommendations are summed up separately for remote access, virtual access, and remote training, complemented by general recommendations for facilitating remote and virtual access to RIs. These relate to budgeting and funding, the balancing of RI access models, the need for regulatory frameworks for sample shipments, collaboration among RIs, impact assessment of remote and virtual access on user interactions, operational efficiency and the environment footprint of RIs, and the adaption of data sharing policies. Stakeholders were broadly invited to give their feedback on the paper's findings and conclusions, which were integrated into an improved version of this paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open research Europe\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11364971/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open research Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18023.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18023.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究基础设施(RIs)是促进所有科学学科创新和知识进步的战略资产。它们为研究人员提供了超越个人或机构能力的先进工具和资源,促进了合作、社区建设和科学标准的应用。对RIs的远程和虚拟访问使科学家无需亲自到场就可以使用这些重要资源。COVID-19大流行的限制促进了远程和虚拟访问模式的扩展和进一步发展,特别是在物理访问一直是主要模式的领域。eRImote项目通过有针对性的调查、利益相关者研讨会、专家组讨论和具体用例分析,收集了在不同科学领域获得的经验,目的是确定良好的实践并提出建议。本文提供了远程和虚拟访问以及远程培训的定义,并探讨了它们在各种RIs中的实现,强调了它们的操作流程的含义以及RIs与其用户社区之间交互的动态。它提出了确定的优势、障碍和最佳实践,以及有效应对和减轻挑战的战略和建议。分别总结了远程访问、虚拟访问和远程培训的关键问题和建议,并补充了促进对RIs的远程和虚拟访问的一般建议。这些问题涉及预算和资金、RI访问模型的平衡、样品运输监管框架的需求、RI之间的协作、远程和虚拟访问对用户交互的影响评估、RI的运营效率和环境足迹,以及数据共享政策的调整。广泛邀请利益相关者对论文的发现和结论提供反馈,这些反馈被整合到本文的改进版本中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Facilitating remote and virtual access provision by European research infrastructures - requirements, issues, and recommendations.

Facilitating remote and virtual access provision by European research infrastructures - requirements, issues, and recommendations.

Facilitating remote and virtual access provision by European research infrastructures - requirements, issues, and recommendations.

Facilitating remote and virtual access provision by European research infrastructures - requirements, issues, and recommendations.

Research infrastructures (RIs) are strategic assets facilitating innovation and knowledge advancement across all scientific disciplines. They provide researchers with advanced tools and resources that go beyond individual or institutional capacities and promote collaboration, community-building and the application of scientific standards. Remote and virtual access to RIs enables scientists to use these essential resources without the necessity of being physically present. The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions where a catalyst for the expansion and further development of remote and virtual access models, particularly in fields where physical access had been the predominant model. The eRImote project collected the experiences gained in different scientific fields through targeted surveys, stakeholder workshops, expert groups discussions, and the analysis of specific use cases, with the aim of identifying good practice and presenting recommendations. This paper provides a definition of remote and virtual access and remote training and explores their implementation across various RIs, highlighting the implications for their operational processes and the dynamics of interaction between RIs and their user communities. It presents the identified advantages, obstacles, and best-practices, alongside strategies and recommendations to navigate and mitigate challenges effectively. Key issues and recommendations are summed up separately for remote access, virtual access, and remote training, complemented by general recommendations for facilitating remote and virtual access to RIs. These relate to budgeting and funding, the balancing of RI access models, the need for regulatory frameworks for sample shipments, collaboration among RIs, impact assessment of remote and virtual access on user interactions, operational efficiency and the environment footprint of RIs, and the adaption of data sharing policies. Stakeholders were broadly invited to give their feedback on the paper's findings and conclusions, which were integrated into an improved version of this paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信