人血小板裂解液生产标准化及其与人造血细胞培养用胎牛血清的比较:综述。

IF 4.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2025.1496231
Shamili Immalaraju, Srishti Goyal, Rukmini Jonnalagadda
{"title":"人血小板裂解液生产标准化及其与人造血细胞培养用胎牛血清的比较:综述。","authors":"Shamili Immalaraju, Srishti Goyal, Rukmini Jonnalagadda","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2025.1496231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human hematopoietic cell culture (HCC) refers to the <i>ex vivo</i> growth of normal cells of the hematological system. These cells can be used as models to understand hematopoiesis and related malignancies. HCC also holds immense potential to help develop safer vaccines and immunotherapies, as well as donor-independent blood products. <i>In vivo</i>, these cells grow and differentiate in highly specialized conditions but replicating these <i>in vitro</i> is a significant technical challenge. Although various strategies have been developed to optimize HCC expansion, implementing them can be costly. Consequently, traditional fetal bovine serum (FBS)-containing media is the first choice, despite its disadvantages. Over the past two decades, human platelet lysate (hPL) has emerged as a viable alternative. However, variations in protocols and reporting standards across laboratories have resulted in a mixed picture regarding its feasibility to replace FBS. Thus, this study aimed to review existing literature that directly compared HCC performance in hPL and FBS supplementation. PubMed, Google Scholar, and the FCS-free database were queried between 1 January to 30 July 2024. Using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, five out of 622 relevant records were included in this scoping review. Data on the hPL production method, HCC conditions and performance were extracted. We identified gaps in the consideration of key hPL production parameters and recommend addressing them to reduce the variability observed in hPL performance. Even though hPL production parameters were repeatedly overlooked, hPL outperformed FBS supplementation in terms of cell identity and functionality across the included HCC studies. Therefore, we highlight the potential of these recommendations to overcome existing technical challenges in HCC, as well as support the development of effective FBS alternatives by enhancing the reproducibility and reporting standards of future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1496231"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the standardization of human platelet lysate production and its comparison to fetal bovine serum for human hematopoietic cell culture: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Shamili Immalaraju, Srishti Goyal, Rukmini Jonnalagadda\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ftox.2025.1496231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human hematopoietic cell culture (HCC) refers to the <i>ex vivo</i> growth of normal cells of the hematological system. These cells can be used as models to understand hematopoiesis and related malignancies. HCC also holds immense potential to help develop safer vaccines and immunotherapies, as well as donor-independent blood products. <i>In vivo</i>, these cells grow and differentiate in highly specialized conditions but replicating these <i>in vitro</i> is a significant technical challenge. Although various strategies have been developed to optimize HCC expansion, implementing them can be costly. Consequently, traditional fetal bovine serum (FBS)-containing media is the first choice, despite its disadvantages. Over the past two decades, human platelet lysate (hPL) has emerged as a viable alternative. However, variations in protocols and reporting standards across laboratories have resulted in a mixed picture regarding its feasibility to replace FBS. Thus, this study aimed to review existing literature that directly compared HCC performance in hPL and FBS supplementation. PubMed, Google Scholar, and the FCS-free database were queried between 1 January to 30 July 2024. Using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, five out of 622 relevant records were included in this scoping review. Data on the hPL production method, HCC conditions and performance were extracted. We identified gaps in the consideration of key hPL production parameters and recommend addressing them to reduce the variability observed in hPL performance. Even though hPL production parameters were repeatedly overlooked, hPL outperformed FBS supplementation in terms of cell identity and functionality across the included HCC studies. Therefore, we highlight the potential of these recommendations to overcome existing technical challenges in HCC, as well as support the development of effective FBS alternatives by enhancing the reproducibility and reporting standards of future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1496231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1496231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1496231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人造血细胞培养(HCC)是指血液系统正常细胞的体外生长。这些细胞可以作为了解造血和相关恶性肿瘤的模型。HCC还具有巨大的潜力,可以帮助开发更安全的疫苗和免疫疗法,以及献血者独立的血液制品。在体内,这些细胞在高度特化的条件下生长和分化,但在体外复制这些细胞是一个重大的技术挑战。虽然已经制定了各种策略来优化HCC的扩展,但实施这些策略可能代价高昂。因此,传统的含胎牛血清(FBS)培养基是首选,尽管它的缺点。在过去的二十年中,人血小板裂解液(hPL)已成为一种可行的替代方案。然而,各实验室在方案和报告标准方面的差异导致了其替代FBS可行性的复杂情况。因此,本研究旨在回顾现有文献,直接比较hPL和FBS补充对HCC的影响。在2024年1月1日至7月30日期间查询PubMed、谷歌Scholar和FCS-free数据库。使用预先定义的纳入和排除标准,622个相关记录中有5个被纳入本次范围审查。提取了hPL生产方法、HCC条件和性能的数据。我们确定了在考虑关键hPL生产参数方面的差距,并建议解决这些差距,以减少在hPL性能中观察到的可变性。尽管hPL的产生参数一再被忽视,但在包括的HCC研究中,hPL在细胞特性和功能方面优于FBS补充。因此,我们强调这些建议的潜力,以克服HCC中现有的技术挑战,并通过提高未来研究的可重复性和报告标准来支持开发有效的FBS替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Towards the standardization of human platelet lysate production and its comparison to fetal bovine serum for human hematopoietic cell culture: a scoping review.

Towards the standardization of human platelet lysate production and its comparison to fetal bovine serum for human hematopoietic cell culture: a scoping review.

Towards the standardization of human platelet lysate production and its comparison to fetal bovine serum for human hematopoietic cell culture: a scoping review.

Towards the standardization of human platelet lysate production and its comparison to fetal bovine serum for human hematopoietic cell culture: a scoping review.

Human hematopoietic cell culture (HCC) refers to the ex vivo growth of normal cells of the hematological system. These cells can be used as models to understand hematopoiesis and related malignancies. HCC also holds immense potential to help develop safer vaccines and immunotherapies, as well as donor-independent blood products. In vivo, these cells grow and differentiate in highly specialized conditions but replicating these in vitro is a significant technical challenge. Although various strategies have been developed to optimize HCC expansion, implementing them can be costly. Consequently, traditional fetal bovine serum (FBS)-containing media is the first choice, despite its disadvantages. Over the past two decades, human platelet lysate (hPL) has emerged as a viable alternative. However, variations in protocols and reporting standards across laboratories have resulted in a mixed picture regarding its feasibility to replace FBS. Thus, this study aimed to review existing literature that directly compared HCC performance in hPL and FBS supplementation. PubMed, Google Scholar, and the FCS-free database were queried between 1 January to 30 July 2024. Using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, five out of 622 relevant records were included in this scoping review. Data on the hPL production method, HCC conditions and performance were extracted. We identified gaps in the consideration of key hPL production parameters and recommend addressing them to reduce the variability observed in hPL performance. Even though hPL production parameters were repeatedly overlooked, hPL outperformed FBS supplementation in terms of cell identity and functionality across the included HCC studies. Therefore, we highlight the potential of these recommendations to overcome existing technical challenges in HCC, as well as support the development of effective FBS alternatives by enhancing the reproducibility and reporting standards of future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信