锥形束计算机断层扫描引导支气管镜下肺周围病变取样:首次印度经验。

IF 1.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Venkata Nagarjuna Maturu, Vipul Kumar Garg, Virender Pratibh Prasad, Rinoosha Rachel, Kishan Srikanth Juvva, Sai Sindhu Kotla
{"title":"锥形束计算机断层扫描引导支气管镜下肺周围病变取样:首次印度经验。","authors":"Venkata Nagarjuna Maturu, Vipul Kumar Garg, Virender Pratibh Prasad, Rinoosha Rachel, Kishan Srikanth Juvva, Sai Sindhu Kotla","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_92_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional bronchoscopic approaches have a lower diagnostic yield (DY) compared to transthoracic biopsy for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided bronchoscopy overcomes the limitations of conventional bronchoscopy techniques. This study evaluates DY, predictors of success, and safety of CBCT-guided bronchoscopy for PPL biopsy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent CBCT-guided biopsy for PPLs between November 2023 and November 2024. Clinico-radiologic and procedural details, tool-in-lesion (TIL) relationships, DY, factors predicting DY, and complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 183 patients who underwent bronchoscopic sampling of PPL during study period, 50 patients underwent CBCT-guided biopsy. The overall DY of CBCT biopsy was 88% (44/50). A type 1 TIL (tool within lesion) was obtained in 57% (28/49), type 2 TIL (tool touch lesion) in 35% (17/49), and a type 3 TIL (tool away from lesion) in four cases. The factors predicting DY were size of lesion and the tool-lesion relationship. DY increased with increasing size of PPL and decreased the farther the tool was from the center of the target. The DY was 100%, 82%, and 25% for lesions with type 1, type 2, and type 3 TIL, respectively ( P = 0.024). CBCT biopsy was safe with no procedural mortality, no pneumothorax, and moderate to severe bleed in seven cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBCT-guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions is safe and has a DY of 88%. DY is higher for lesions ≥2 cm and when the tool is within the lesion (type 1 TIL) on CBCT spin.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cone beam computed tomography-guided bronchoscopic sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions: The first Indian experience.\",\"authors\":\"Venkata Nagarjuna Maturu, Vipul Kumar Garg, Virender Pratibh Prasad, Rinoosha Rachel, Kishan Srikanth Juvva, Sai Sindhu Kotla\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_92_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional bronchoscopic approaches have a lower diagnostic yield (DY) compared to transthoracic biopsy for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided bronchoscopy overcomes the limitations of conventional bronchoscopy techniques. This study evaluates DY, predictors of success, and safety of CBCT-guided bronchoscopy for PPL biopsy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent CBCT-guided biopsy for PPLs between November 2023 and November 2024. Clinico-radiologic and procedural details, tool-in-lesion (TIL) relationships, DY, factors predicting DY, and complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 183 patients who underwent bronchoscopic sampling of PPL during study period, 50 patients underwent CBCT-guided biopsy. The overall DY of CBCT biopsy was 88% (44/50). A type 1 TIL (tool within lesion) was obtained in 57% (28/49), type 2 TIL (tool touch lesion) in 35% (17/49), and a type 3 TIL (tool away from lesion) in four cases. The factors predicting DY were size of lesion and the tool-lesion relationship. DY increased with increasing size of PPL and decreased the farther the tool was from the center of the target. The DY was 100%, 82%, and 25% for lesions with type 1, type 2, and type 3 TIL, respectively ( P = 0.024). CBCT biopsy was safe with no procedural mortality, no pneumothorax, and moderate to severe bleed in seven cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBCT-guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions is safe and has a DY of 88%. DY is higher for lesions ≥2 cm and when the tool is within the lesion (type 1 TIL) on CBCT spin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung India\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_92_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_92_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与经胸肺外周病变活检(ppl)相比,传统支气管镜检查方法的诊断率(DY)较低。锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)引导支气管镜检查克服了传统支气管镜检查技术的局限性。本研究评估了cbct引导支气管镜下PPL活检的DY、成功的预测因素和安全性。材料和方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2023年11月至2024年11月期间接受cbct引导下ppl活检的所有连续患者。评估了临床放射学和手术细节、病变内工具(TIL)关系、DY、预测DY的因素和并发症。结果:在研究期间接受支气管镜PPL取样的183例患者中,有50例患者接受了cbct引导下的活检。CBCT活检的总DY为88%(44/50)。1型TIL(工具在病变内)占57%(28/49),2型TIL(工具接触病变)占35%(17/49),3型TIL(工具远离病变)占4例。预测DY的因素有病变大小和工具-病变关系。DY随PPL尺寸的增大而增大,随刀具离靶心越远而减小。1型、2型和3型TIL病变的DY分别为100%、82%和25% (P = 0.024)。CBCT活检是安全的,无程序性死亡,无气胸,7例中至重度出血。结论:cbct引导下肺周围病变活检是安全的,DY为88%。在CBCT旋转中,病变≥2 cm和工具位于病变内(1型TIL)时,DY更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cone beam computed tomography-guided bronchoscopic sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions: The first Indian experience.

Background: Conventional bronchoscopic approaches have a lower diagnostic yield (DY) compared to transthoracic biopsy for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided bronchoscopy overcomes the limitations of conventional bronchoscopy techniques. This study evaluates DY, predictors of success, and safety of CBCT-guided bronchoscopy for PPL biopsy.

Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent CBCT-guided biopsy for PPLs between November 2023 and November 2024. Clinico-radiologic and procedural details, tool-in-lesion (TIL) relationships, DY, factors predicting DY, and complications were assessed.

Results: Of the 183 patients who underwent bronchoscopic sampling of PPL during study period, 50 patients underwent CBCT-guided biopsy. The overall DY of CBCT biopsy was 88% (44/50). A type 1 TIL (tool within lesion) was obtained in 57% (28/49), type 2 TIL (tool touch lesion) in 35% (17/49), and a type 3 TIL (tool away from lesion) in four cases. The factors predicting DY were size of lesion and the tool-lesion relationship. DY increased with increasing size of PPL and decreased the farther the tool was from the center of the target. The DY was 100%, 82%, and 25% for lesions with type 1, type 2, and type 3 TIL, respectively ( P = 0.024). CBCT biopsy was safe with no procedural mortality, no pneumothorax, and moderate to severe bleed in seven cases.

Conclusion: CBCT-guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions is safe and has a DY of 88%. DY is higher for lesions ≥2 cm and when the tool is within the lesion (type 1 TIL) on CBCT spin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信