本科护理教育中的混合式学习:探索学生体验、满意度和知识。

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S520500
Zeinab A Abusabeib
{"title":"本科护理教育中的混合式学习:探索学生体验、满意度和知识。","authors":"Zeinab A Abusabeib","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S520500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blended learning merges in-person instruction with online education, offering flexible and individualized learning experiences. This approach is especially valuable in nursing education, where connecting theoretical knowledge with practical application is crucial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to investigate nursing students' experiences and satisfaction levels regarding blended learning in a Clinical Nutrition Course targeted at third-year nursing students while comparing the knowledge outcomes of blended learning and traditional learning groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study design was utilized to evaluate the experiences of 307 female nursing students through the Web-based Learning Environment Instrument (WEBLEI). Data were collected online using a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Moreover, academic performance between the blended learning group (2024-2025) and the traditional group (2023-2024) was compared using independent t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students reported a high level of satisfaction with blended learning, evident from the overall WEBLEI scores. Scores for Access (4.48), Interaction (4.40), Response (4.59), and Results (4.64) indicated favorable views regarding flexibility, engagement, and knowledge gain. The blended learning group exhibited significantly better academic performance (Total Score: 94.39 ± 4.78) compared to the traditional group (89.21 ± 5.39; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blended learning significantly improves both student satisfaction and academic performance in nursing education. Enhancing peer interaction and incorporating additional synchronous activities could further enhance the blended learning approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1197-1207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blended Learning in Bachelor's Nursing Education: Exploring Student Experiences, Satisfaction, and Knowledge.\",\"authors\":\"Zeinab A Abusabeib\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S520500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blended learning merges in-person instruction with online education, offering flexible and individualized learning experiences. This approach is especially valuable in nursing education, where connecting theoretical knowledge with practical application is crucial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to investigate nursing students' experiences and satisfaction levels regarding blended learning in a Clinical Nutrition Course targeted at third-year nursing students while comparing the knowledge outcomes of blended learning and traditional learning groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study design was utilized to evaluate the experiences of 307 female nursing students through the Web-based Learning Environment Instrument (WEBLEI). Data were collected online using a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Moreover, academic performance between the blended learning group (2024-2025) and the traditional group (2023-2024) was compared using independent t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students reported a high level of satisfaction with blended learning, evident from the overall WEBLEI scores. Scores for Access (4.48), Interaction (4.40), Response (4.59), and Results (4.64) indicated favorable views regarding flexibility, engagement, and knowledge gain. The blended learning group exhibited significantly better academic performance (Total Score: 94.39 ± 4.78) compared to the traditional group (89.21 ± 5.39; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blended learning significantly improves both student satisfaction and academic performance in nursing education. Enhancing peer interaction and incorporating additional synchronous activities could further enhance the blended learning approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1197-1207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256046/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S520500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S520500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:混合式学习将面对面教学与在线教育相结合,提供灵活和个性化的学习体验。这种方法在护理教育中特别有价值,将理论知识与实际应用联系起来是至关重要的。目的:调查护生在三年级临床营养课程中混合学习的体验和满意度,并比较混合学习组和传统学习组的知识成果。方法:采用横断面研究设计,对307名女护生进行网络学习环境量表(WEBLEI)测评。使用5点李克特量表在线收集数据,并使用描述性统计进行分析。采用独立t检验比较混合学习组(2024-2025)与传统学习组(2023-2024)的学习成绩。结果:从WEBLEI的总体得分来看,学生对混合式学习的满意度很高。访问(4.48),互动(4.40),回应(4.59)和结果(4.64)的得分表明了对灵活性,参与度和知识获取的有利看法。混合学习组的学习成绩(总分:94.39±4.78)明显优于传统学习组(总分:89.21±5.39);P < 0.001)。结论:混合学习能显著提高护理教育学生满意度和学习成绩。加强同侪互动和纳入额外的同步活动可进一步加强混合式学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blended Learning in Bachelor's Nursing Education: Exploring Student Experiences, Satisfaction, and Knowledge.

Background: Blended learning merges in-person instruction with online education, offering flexible and individualized learning experiences. This approach is especially valuable in nursing education, where connecting theoretical knowledge with practical application is crucial.

Objective: The study aims to investigate nursing students' experiences and satisfaction levels regarding blended learning in a Clinical Nutrition Course targeted at third-year nursing students while comparing the knowledge outcomes of blended learning and traditional learning groups.

Methods: A cross-sectional study design was utilized to evaluate the experiences of 307 female nursing students through the Web-based Learning Environment Instrument (WEBLEI). Data were collected online using a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Moreover, academic performance between the blended learning group (2024-2025) and the traditional group (2023-2024) was compared using independent t-tests.

Results: Students reported a high level of satisfaction with blended learning, evident from the overall WEBLEI scores. Scores for Access (4.48), Interaction (4.40), Response (4.59), and Results (4.64) indicated favorable views regarding flexibility, engagement, and knowledge gain. The blended learning group exhibited significantly better academic performance (Total Score: 94.39 ± 4.78) compared to the traditional group (89.21 ± 5.39; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Blended learning significantly improves both student satisfaction and academic performance in nursing education. Enhancing peer interaction and incorporating additional synchronous activities could further enhance the blended learning approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信