Ellen M Cahill, Ernesto Morfin Montes de Oca, Jose M Flores, Nelson E Bennett, John P Mulhall
{"title":"根治性前列腺切除术患者保留生育能力的知识和态度。","authors":"Ellen M Cahill, Ernesto Morfin Montes de Oca, Jose M Flores, Nelson E Bennett, John P Mulhall","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand the fertility discussion experience and attitudes regarding fertility of men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men who had had a RP within the prior 3 months who were ≤50 years of age with a partner of reproductive age (≤45 years) were included. In a written questionnaire, men were asked about their understanding of the impact of RP on their future fertility, whether they were counseled on sperm banking, whether they actually banked sperm, and if they had not, their level of interest in sperm extraction post-RP. Patient and partner demographic data was recorded. A multivariable model was constructed to look for predictors of interest in fertility in men undergoing RP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 364 men responded to the questionnaire. Median patient and partner age were 45 (39,49) and 35 (34,40) years, respectively. 28% of men indicated an interest in future fertility. 58% of men did not recall being told about anejaculation post-RP, 84% were unaware that sperm banking preoperatively was an option, and only 7% of those interested in fertility actually banked sperm. Only 8 men (2%) were aware that testis sperm extraction was a possibility post-RP. Predictors of interest in fertility post-RP included younger partner age, patient without children, and partner without children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the majority of men undergoing RP are not interested in fertility, a distinct minority are, and appear to be poorly educated and prepared for fertility decisions before or after RP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and Attitudes towards Fertility Preservation in Patients undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen M Cahill, Ernesto Morfin Montes de Oca, Jose M Flores, Nelson E Bennett, John P Mulhall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2025.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand the fertility discussion experience and attitudes regarding fertility of men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men who had had a RP within the prior 3 months who were ≤50 years of age with a partner of reproductive age (≤45 years) were included. In a written questionnaire, men were asked about their understanding of the impact of RP on their future fertility, whether they were counseled on sperm banking, whether they actually banked sperm, and if they had not, their level of interest in sperm extraction post-RP. Patient and partner demographic data was recorded. A multivariable model was constructed to look for predictors of interest in fertility in men undergoing RP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 364 men responded to the questionnaire. Median patient and partner age were 45 (39,49) and 35 (34,40) years, respectively. 28% of men indicated an interest in future fertility. 58% of men did not recall being told about anejaculation post-RP, 84% were unaware that sperm banking preoperatively was an option, and only 7% of those interested in fertility actually banked sperm. Only 8 men (2%) were aware that testis sperm extraction was a possibility post-RP. Predictors of interest in fertility post-RP included younger partner age, patient without children, and partner without children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the majority of men undergoing RP are not interested in fertility, a distinct minority are, and appear to be poorly educated and prepared for fertility decisions before or after RP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.07.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.07.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge and Attitudes towards Fertility Preservation in Patients undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Objective: To better understand the fertility discussion experience and attitudes regarding fertility of men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods: Men who had had a RP within the prior 3 months who were ≤50 years of age with a partner of reproductive age (≤45 years) were included. In a written questionnaire, men were asked about their understanding of the impact of RP on their future fertility, whether they were counseled on sperm banking, whether they actually banked sperm, and if they had not, their level of interest in sperm extraction post-RP. Patient and partner demographic data was recorded. A multivariable model was constructed to look for predictors of interest in fertility in men undergoing RP.
Results: In total, 364 men responded to the questionnaire. Median patient and partner age were 45 (39,49) and 35 (34,40) years, respectively. 28% of men indicated an interest in future fertility. 58% of men did not recall being told about anejaculation post-RP, 84% were unaware that sperm banking preoperatively was an option, and only 7% of those interested in fertility actually banked sperm. Only 8 men (2%) were aware that testis sperm extraction was a possibility post-RP. Predictors of interest in fertility post-RP included younger partner age, patient without children, and partner without children.
Conclusion: While the majority of men undergoing RP are not interested in fertility, a distinct minority are, and appear to be poorly educated and prepared for fertility decisions before or after RP.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.