{"title":"妊娠期抗体筛查阴性类孟买表型的血清学调查和处理。","authors":"Yaseen Ali Jamal, Joshua Alston Nicholas, Tong Wang, Mohamed Abdelmonem, Suchitra Pandey, Mrigender Singh Virk","doi":"10.1111/tme.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with Bombay and para-Bombay red blood cell (RBC) phenotypes produce anti-H antibodies associated with acute haemolytic transfusion reactions. The rarity of compatible donor units creates unique logistical challenges, especially during pregnancy as the onset of labour and fetal distress can occur without warning.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 24-year-old female at 38 weeks gestation presented with breech fetal position and reported anti-H antibodies. Critically, the in-house antibody screen was negative by automated solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA), while manual testing subsequently demonstrated anti-H antibodies. Forward typing with Ulex europaeus lectin confirmed the absence of H-antigen on RBCs, while Lewis phenotyping and saliva neutralisation revealed H-antigen in secretions, consistent with the para-Bombay phenotype. Three frozen Bombay RBC units were obtained from a nationwide search, and four cross-match compatible non-Bombay (O-positive) units were also prepared. An external cephalic version (ECV) was originally planned since vaginal delivery carries lower bleeding risk than caesarean section (CS). However, acknowledging the unpredictability of ECV, the challenge of timing thawed units, and the possibilities of massive haemorrhage versus wasting rare donor blood, an elective CS was ultimately preferred. Delivery was uneventful without transfusion needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights key considerations regarding serologic identification, blood product management, and interdisciplinary clinical decision-making for patients with Bombay and para-Bombay phenotypes. First, automated SPRCA testing may provide false negative results for anti-H antibodies. Second, backup transfusion strategies for para-Bombay patients may include non-Bombay RBCs. Finally, the procurement, preparation, and use of rare blood products requires thoughtful deliberation between multiple care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"399-402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serologic investigation and management of an antibody screen negative para-Bombay phenotype during pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Yaseen Ali Jamal, Joshua Alston Nicholas, Tong Wang, Mohamed Abdelmonem, Suchitra Pandey, Mrigender Singh Virk\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tme.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with Bombay and para-Bombay red blood cell (RBC) phenotypes produce anti-H antibodies associated with acute haemolytic transfusion reactions. The rarity of compatible donor units creates unique logistical challenges, especially during pregnancy as the onset of labour and fetal distress can occur without warning.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 24-year-old female at 38 weeks gestation presented with breech fetal position and reported anti-H antibodies. Critically, the in-house antibody screen was negative by automated solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA), while manual testing subsequently demonstrated anti-H antibodies. Forward typing with Ulex europaeus lectin confirmed the absence of H-antigen on RBCs, while Lewis phenotyping and saliva neutralisation revealed H-antigen in secretions, consistent with the para-Bombay phenotype. Three frozen Bombay RBC units were obtained from a nationwide search, and four cross-match compatible non-Bombay (O-positive) units were also prepared. An external cephalic version (ECV) was originally planned since vaginal delivery carries lower bleeding risk than caesarean section (CS). However, acknowledging the unpredictability of ECV, the challenge of timing thawed units, and the possibilities of massive haemorrhage versus wasting rare donor blood, an elective CS was ultimately preferred. Delivery was uneventful without transfusion needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights key considerations regarding serologic identification, blood product management, and interdisciplinary clinical decision-making for patients with Bombay and para-Bombay phenotypes. First, automated SPRCA testing may provide false negative results for anti-H antibodies. Second, backup transfusion strategies for para-Bombay patients may include non-Bombay RBCs. Finally, the procurement, preparation, and use of rare blood products requires thoughtful deliberation between multiple care providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"399-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.70000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Serologic investigation and management of an antibody screen negative para-Bombay phenotype during pregnancy.
Background: Individuals with Bombay and para-Bombay red blood cell (RBC) phenotypes produce anti-H antibodies associated with acute haemolytic transfusion reactions. The rarity of compatible donor units creates unique logistical challenges, especially during pregnancy as the onset of labour and fetal distress can occur without warning.
Case report: A 24-year-old female at 38 weeks gestation presented with breech fetal position and reported anti-H antibodies. Critically, the in-house antibody screen was negative by automated solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA), while manual testing subsequently demonstrated anti-H antibodies. Forward typing with Ulex europaeus lectin confirmed the absence of H-antigen on RBCs, while Lewis phenotyping and saliva neutralisation revealed H-antigen in secretions, consistent with the para-Bombay phenotype. Three frozen Bombay RBC units were obtained from a nationwide search, and four cross-match compatible non-Bombay (O-positive) units were also prepared. An external cephalic version (ECV) was originally planned since vaginal delivery carries lower bleeding risk than caesarean section (CS). However, acknowledging the unpredictability of ECV, the challenge of timing thawed units, and the possibilities of massive haemorrhage versus wasting rare donor blood, an elective CS was ultimately preferred. Delivery was uneventful without transfusion needs.
Conclusion: This case highlights key considerations regarding serologic identification, blood product management, and interdisciplinary clinical decision-making for patients with Bombay and para-Bombay phenotypes. First, automated SPRCA testing may provide false negative results for anti-H antibodies. Second, backup transfusion strategies for para-Bombay patients may include non-Bombay RBCs. Finally, the procurement, preparation, and use of rare blood products requires thoughtful deliberation between multiple care providers.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology.
In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.