{"title":"对人工智能在人员选择中对人际交往能力的评估抱有信念。","authors":"Ilyung Cheong, Young Eun Huh, Stefano Puntoni","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-10358-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing talent acquisition, with organizations increasingly replacing humans with AI technologies in personnel selection processes. Field studies of nurses provide preliminary evidence that AI can outperform humans in predicting interpersonal skills. However, a series of surveys and experiments document widespread lay beliefs in the opposite direction: individuals perceive AI as being less capable than humans in assessing interpersonal skills. This effect was not observed for analytical skills, suggesting that the results stem from lay beliefs about the suitability of AI in interpersonal contexts and not from a generalized aversion to algorithms. These lay beliefs bias managers' perceptions of employees: managers were less likely to assign tasks requiring interpersonal skills to AI-selected (vs. human-selected) employees. Additionally, applicants reported reducing their emphasis on interpersonal (vs. analytical) skills during AI (vs. human) selection processes. Informing participants about advanced AI selection technologies reduced negative lay beliefs about AI performance in the interpersonal domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"25317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lay beliefs about AI assessment of interpersonal skills in personnel selection.\",\"authors\":\"Ilyung Cheong, Young Eun Huh, Stefano Puntoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-10358-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing talent acquisition, with organizations increasingly replacing humans with AI technologies in personnel selection processes. Field studies of nurses provide preliminary evidence that AI can outperform humans in predicting interpersonal skills. However, a series of surveys and experiments document widespread lay beliefs in the opposite direction: individuals perceive AI as being less capable than humans in assessing interpersonal skills. This effect was not observed for analytical skills, suggesting that the results stem from lay beliefs about the suitability of AI in interpersonal contexts and not from a generalized aversion to algorithms. These lay beliefs bias managers' perceptions of employees: managers were less likely to assign tasks requiring interpersonal skills to AI-selected (vs. human-selected) employees. Additionally, applicants reported reducing their emphasis on interpersonal (vs. analytical) skills during AI (vs. human) selection processes. Informing participants about advanced AI selection technologies reduced negative lay beliefs about AI performance in the interpersonal domains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"25317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256587/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10358-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10358-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lay beliefs about AI assessment of interpersonal skills in personnel selection.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing talent acquisition, with organizations increasingly replacing humans with AI technologies in personnel selection processes. Field studies of nurses provide preliminary evidence that AI can outperform humans in predicting interpersonal skills. However, a series of surveys and experiments document widespread lay beliefs in the opposite direction: individuals perceive AI as being less capable than humans in assessing interpersonal skills. This effect was not observed for analytical skills, suggesting that the results stem from lay beliefs about the suitability of AI in interpersonal contexts and not from a generalized aversion to algorithms. These lay beliefs bias managers' perceptions of employees: managers were less likely to assign tasks requiring interpersonal skills to AI-selected (vs. human-selected) employees. Additionally, applicants reported reducing their emphasis on interpersonal (vs. analytical) skills during AI (vs. human) selection processes. Informing participants about advanced AI selection technologies reduced negative lay beliefs about AI performance in the interpersonal domains.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.